Options

Katie Price has had her Baby

1137138140142143174

Comments

  • Options
    jannajanna Posts: 7,323
    Forum Member
    Badcat wrote: »
    Considering that report was in April 2012 and they then had another report a month later which was fine, why drag it up now? hmm?

    Shame the RSPCA never went round to KP house when she tweeted that one of her dogs had bitten off one of her chickens toes. Dogs attacking chickens could lead to them attacking a small baby, especially when it's starts to crawl.... couldn't it?
    WHHHHATTT ?:eek:
    Oh my God, I don't believe you ! That's appalling !:(
    Poor little chicken.
    She doesn't half keep some huge dogs. Not very wise around small children one of whom might be less aware of imminent danger than his siblings would be.
  • Options
    Brighton BhelleBrighton Bhelle Posts: 723
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    janna wrote: »
    WHHHHATTT ?:eek:
    Oh my God, I don't believe you ! That's appalling !:(
    Poor little chicken.
    She doesn't half keep some huge dogs. Not very wise around small children one of whom might be less aware of imminent danger than his siblings would be.

    She seems to buy animals and get rid of them within a few months quite regularly. Hasn't she had about 4 or 5 horses in a year because she 'couldn't get on' with them?

    More like the horses took one look at her and decided 'I'm not playing for this one'. ;)
  • Options
    fredsterfredster Posts: 31,802
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    janna wrote: »
    G'day g'day missus. Yes indeedy,nicely filled venues, queues at his signings,an adorable pretty girl friend, new baby on the way and a busy busy little coffee business......doing rather well since he dumped the old page three person.Well let's be honest ,he couldn't do any worse. But that's Pete and he has his own thread I'm told so back on topic.

    Only two more 'sleeps' till the OK airbrush extravaganza gets revealed,I'm SO excited.:yawn:

    Yes, I shall be first in the queue.;)
  • Options
    jannajanna Posts: 7,323
    Forum Member
    I don't think anyone's saying potential food poisoning is a trivial matter, just that it seems rather out of proportion for a member of this forum seemingly to go out of their way to request a copy of the hygiene report under the FoI act, when newspapers would report what was in it anyway and anyone can read it on the net.

    How has this got derailed to a let's bash Andre thread anyway? :confused:

    I'm still trying to get my head round why anyone would request that for forum fodder. On the plus side it DOES mean that material to constructively criticise him about is lacking, on account of his near perfection these days. I'm liking Pete more by the day y'know.
    Much as I despise Pwicey (who knew eh ?:p) I'd draw the line at using the Freedom Of Information Act to seek out dirt on her.
    Anyway there's lots of dirt on her floating around the broken grubby toilet of zelebrity to be going on with............. and I know an excellent Archivist .
  • Options
    sidsgirlsidsgirl Posts: 4,425
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Cym wrote: »
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2133843/Peter-Andres-cafe-secrets-revealed-Filthy-floors-overflowing-bins-wash-basin-food-handlers.html

    You think potential food poisoning trivial :confused: especially in a place where children are encouraged to eat :confused: as you see this paper got its info from the official report, a poster challenged PA nonsense claims at the time which they had every right to do, but there was nothing more than had already been published, which was, by anyones standard, more than enough, more than enough that is... depending on what your own personal standards are in the first place, of course ;)


    Really no need for this. :(
  • Options
    Holly_EvansHolly_Evans Posts: 1,050
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Cym wrote: »
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2133843/Peter-Andres-cafe-secrets-revealed-Filthy-floors-overflowing-bins-wash-basin-food-handlers.html

    You think potential food poisoning trivial :confused: especially in a place where children are encouraged to eat :confused: as you see this paper got its info from the official report, a poster challenged PA nonsense claims at the time which they had every right to do, but there was nothing more than had already been published, which was, by anyones standard, more than enough, more than enough that is... depending on what your own personal standards are in the first place, of course ;)

    So because someone mentions they like Andres smoothies, this is brought up from ages ago:confused: Are we 6 years old?
  • Options
    Holly_EvansHolly_Evans Posts: 1,050
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    sidsgirl wrote: »
    Really no need for this. :(

    I agree, but the ignore button is our friend :)
  • Options
    jannajanna Posts: 7,323
    Forum Member
    She seems to buy animals and get rid of them within a few months quite regularly. Hasn't she had about 4 or 5 horses in a year because she 'couldn't get on' with them?

    More like the horses took one look at her and decided 'I'm not playing for this one'. ;)

    Does the dashing Mister Gould still go with her on horsey buying trips ?
    4 or 5 in a year .....wow !, that's a lot of horsey-buying trips with your 'trainer '.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 1,881
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    SenseiSam wrote: »
    They'd find it hard to get a seat - it's been packed out every time we've been in.

    That must be, according to PA, on the other days when theres only one person serving who spends up to seven mins at a time in the back of the shop
  • Options
    jannajanna Posts: 7,323
    Forum Member
    Well hopefully we'll be spared any bikini shots in OK since she was twibbling on about her excess weight not shifting .
  • Options
    Brighton BhelleBrighton Bhelle Posts: 723
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    janna wrote: »
    Well hopefully we'll be spared any bikini shots in OK since she was twibbling on about her excess weight not shifting .

    In the back view pics of her at the airport she looked quite middle aged and dumpy, so if the front's owt like the back I somehow doubt her numerous collection of skimpies will be coming out. :D
  • Options
    SenseiSamSenseiSam Posts: 3,069
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    So because someone mentions they like Andres smoothies, this is brought up from ages ago:confused: Are we 6 years old?

    Sad isn't it but as you say best ignored ;)

    I'm very proficient at skim reading so I'll volunteer to read OK in the shop and report back but I couldn't buy a copy of anything with Katie on the cover :o Made the one and only exception for Closer so that we could all see her cute blanket but never again :eek:
  • Options
    tsarinatsarina Posts: 529
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    janna wrote: »
    Well hopefully we'll be spared any bikini shots in OK since she was twibbling on about her excess weight not shifting .

    Airbrush is your friend :)

    Should we run a sweep on how many strokes of the airbrush will have been used in the article.

    Thinking about it, we could run a sweep on all sorts; which ex gets mentioned first, how quickly Kev is mentioned as being 'the one', how much work she has in the pipeline (hollywood life story, next tapeytalky (copyright Janna), next bridal/underwear/pornwear/make-up/flippyfloppy range etc)
  • Options
    jannajanna Posts: 7,323
    Forum Member
    In the back view pics of her at the airport she looked quite middle aged and dumpy, so if the front's owt like the back I somehow doubt her numerous collection of skimpies will be coming out. :D

    True, but the airport ones are more honest than the staged and airbrushed trash the mags feed people. Yes, she looks dumpy ,but at least it looks more natural for a new mum. But she def has not got good skin and has a really grumpy face in repose.
  • Options
    tsarinatsarina Posts: 529
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    janna wrote: »
    True, but the airport ones are more honest than the staged and airbrushed trash the mags feed people. Yes, she looks dumpy ,but at least it looks more natural for a new mum. But she def has not got good skin and has a really grumpy face in repose.

    I'm not sure, even in any circumstance, can she be classed as dumpy (woops typed dummy - what a freudian slip!). She looks normal, unlike the big boob, matchstick bent leg looks she normally favours.
  • Options
    jannajanna Posts: 7,323
    Forum Member
    tsarina wrote: »
    Airbrush is your friend :)

    Should we run a sweep on how many strokes of the airbrush will have been used in the article.

    Thinking about it, we could run a sweep on all sorts; which ex gets mentioned first, how quickly Kev is mentioned as being 'the one', how much work she has in the pipeline (hollywood life story, next tapeytalky (copyright Janna), next bridal/underwear/pornwear/make-up/flippyfloppy range etc)

    Her airbrushing team would lie to us. They lied to Sam when she asked them to joosh up my photo ID . There is NO way they'd need to use the 537 strokes they quoted to make me look pwetty. :mad:

    We'd need a whole new subsection for sweeps alone in that case.
    YOU talk to Admin about it since you are so well in with them :p
  • Options
    Brighton BhelleBrighton Bhelle Posts: 723
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    tsarina wrote: »
    I'm not sure, even in any circumstance, can she be classed as dumpy (woops typed dummy - what a freudian slip!). She looks normal, unlike the big boob, matchstick bent leg looks she normally favours.

    Oh I agree, but I bet she'd be horrified to be photographed looking like she does on the 6th pic down. The airbrush would be on fire in that case. ;) The paps don't seem to be going quite so apesh*t over her these days either.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2435411/Katie-Price-jets-UK-work-flurry-pink-just-days-hospitalisation.html
  • Options
    tsarinatsarina Posts: 529
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    janna wrote: »
    Her airbrushing team would lie to us. They lied to Sam when she asked them to joosh up my photo ID . There is NO way they'd need to use the 537 strokes they quoted to make me look pwetty. :mad:

    We'd need a whole new subsection for sweeps alone in that case.
    YOU talk to Admin about it since you are so well in with them :p


    :D Going to do that right now :p

    Then I'm going to watch my download of Strictly - whilst I'm doing that, you guys can up with some sweep subjects :)

    ('Strictly' in a KP thread, she would sell her firstborn for that - woops again, already sold :mad:)
  • Options
    fredsterfredster Posts: 31,802
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    SenseiSam wrote: »
    Sad isn't it but as you say best ignored ;)

    I'm very proficient at skim reading so I'll volunteer to read OK in the shop and report back but I couldn't buy a copy of anything with Katie on the cover :o Made the one and only exception for Closer so that we could all see her cute blanket but never again :eek:

    Me too, I go for the longest Queue, read what I want, put the magazine back and go.
  • Options
    SenseiSamSenseiSam Posts: 3,069
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    tsarina wrote: »
    Thinking about it, we could run a sweep on all sorts; which ex gets mentioned first, how quickly Kev is mentioned as being 'the one', how much work she has in the pipeline (hollywood life story, next tapeytalky (copyright Janna), next bridal/underwear/pornwear/make-up/flippyfloppy range etc)

    I think she'll be attempting to drum up some interest in her book which might be waning if she's had to take out the lawsuit bits and if Alex has scooped her with his confession. What's left? Leo - can't be too nasty there in case he has more of her texts to footballers which he might be tempted to share over twitter. Danny? Kelly's already demonstrated a much classier response to him. So that leaves the 'whirlwind romance' with Kev? :D:D:D
  • Options
    fredsterfredster Posts: 31,802
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Oh I agree, but I bet she'd be horrified to be photographed looking like she does on the 6th pic down. The airbrush would be on fire in that case. ;) The paps don't seem to be going quite so apesh*t over her these days either.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2435411/Katie-Price-jets-UK-work-flurry-pink-just-days-hospitalisation.html

    Poor little Jett, he has a pink crib.:rolleyes:
  • Options
    SenseiSamSenseiSam Posts: 3,069
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    fredster wrote: »
    Me too, I go for the longest Queue, read what I want, put the magazine back and go.

    I'm glad it's not just me fred :)
  • Options
    Brighton BhelleBrighton Bhelle Posts: 723
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    fredster wrote: »
    Poor little Jett, he has a pink crib.:rolleyes:

    I think it's white fred, but the light makes it look a bit pink.

    Horrid blanket though. Looks like an old sweater that Kev would wear to work - buliding that is, not stripping. :p:D
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 847
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    fredster wrote: »
    Me too, I go for the longest Queue, read what I want, put the magazine back and go.

    I am going to go extra early for my appointment at the docs next week so I can read it in the waiting room. I might even take a flask and some sarnies with me:D
  • Options
    BanditaBandita Posts: 3,735
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Scotty 567 wrote: »
    I am going to go extra early for my appointment at the docs next week so I can read it in the waiting room. I might even take a flask and some sarnies with me:D

    Oh lovely, that just reminds me I've got the dentist on Wednesday so might do the same even though I hate going there she usually has some 'new' magazines!!
This discussion has been closed.