Options

Scottish Labour's Cara Hilton wins Dunfermline by election from the SNP

barrcode88barrcode88 Posts: 6,849
Forum Member
Lab 10275
SNP 7402
LD 2852
Con 2009
UKIP 908
Green,583
Ind 161

Swing of 7% from SNP to Lab. Great result that. SNP activists booing Cara Hilton 's speech. Cries of "shame" and "pathetic" - project fear? Also interesting is the dwindling Lib Dem vote.

Lib Dem vote
2007: 33.2%
2011: 19.7%
2013: 11.8%
«13

Comments

  • Options
    BenllechBenllech Posts: 2,299
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Well woopty freaking do!
  • Options
    konebyvaxkonebyvax Posts: 9,120
    Forum Member
    barrcode88 wrote: »
    Lab 10275
    SNP 7402
    LD 2852
    Con 2009
    UKIP 908
    Green,583
    Ind 161

    Swing of 7% from SNP to Lab. Great result that. SNP activists booing Cara Hilton 's speech. Cries of "shame" and "pathetic" - project fear? Also interesting is the dwindling Lib Dem vote.

    Lib Dem vote
    2007: 33.2%
    2011: 19.7%
    2013: 11.8%


    Dwindling? It will be almost non-existent at the next GE.
  • Options
    northantsgirlnorthantsgirl Posts: 4,663
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Benllech wrote: »
    Well woopty freaking do!

    I'm sure that was the thought of many about the Welsh by-election for Anglesey a few weeks back.
  • Options
    smudges dadsmudges dad Posts: 36,989
    Forum Member
    Conservatives 8.3%
    UKIP 3.75%
    Turnout down about 6,000
  • Options
    angarrackangarrack Posts: 5,493
    Forum Member
    Conservatives 8.3%
    UKIP 3.75%
    Turnout down about 6,000

    You forgot to mention the SNP.
  • Options
    trevgotrevgo Posts: 28,241
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Very rare for me to relish a Labour victory, but very pleased to see the SNP get a bloody nose.

    It will cost me a hundred quid, but I'll happily swap my wager to see a distraught Salmond the morning after the referendum.
  • Options
    smudges dadsmudges dad Posts: 36,989
    Forum Member
    angarrack wrote: »
    You forgot to mention the SNP.

    Labour 42.5%
    SNP 30.6
    LD 11.8
    Con 8.3
    EIP 3.75
    Green 2.45:cry:
    Ind 0.7
  • Options
    northantsgirlnorthantsgirl Posts: 4,663
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Lib Dems did better than I expected- had them down to get below 10%.
  • Options
    angarrackangarrack Posts: 5,493
    Forum Member
    Labour 42.5%
    SNP 30.6
    LD 11.8
    Con 8.3
    EIP 3.75
    Green 2.45:cry:
    Ind 0.7

    SNP - 6.99%
    Lab + 6.89%
    Con + 1.16%
    UKIP + 3.75%
  • Options
    johnny_boi_UKjohnny_boi_UK Posts: 3,761
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    trevgo wrote: »
    Very rare for me to relish a Labour victory, but very pleased to see the SNP get a bloody nose.

    Same here, an the coservatives seem to have increased their share:cool:
  • Options
    smudges dadsmudges dad Posts: 36,989
    Forum Member
    At least Nigel Farage didn't open the EIP campaign in Inverness or somewhere totally unrelated to the constituency, like he did for the Aberdeen one.
  • Options
    angarrackangarrack Posts: 5,493
    Forum Member
    At least Nigel Farage didn't open the EIP campaign in Inverness or somewhere totally unrelated to the constituency, like he did for the Aberdeen one.

    Diversion!
  • Options
    smudges dadsmudges dad Posts: 36,989
    Forum Member
    angarrack wrote: »
    Diversion!

    Nope, entirely related to the by-election campaign :)
  • Options
    woot_whoowoot_whoo Posts: 18,030
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Nope, entirely related to the by-election campaign :)

    Indeed, and worth noting that UKIP have continued their track record of 100% deposit losses in Scotland.
  • Options
    angarrackangarrack Posts: 5,493
    Forum Member
    woot_whoo wrote: »
    Indeed, and worth noting that UKIP have continued their track record of 100% deposit losses in Scotland.

    Yes, lets all talk about UKIP and the Greens.
    Thats the big news to come out of this by-election.
  • Options
    woot_whoowoot_whoo Posts: 18,030
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    angarrack wrote: »
    Yes, lets all talk about UKIP and the Greens.
    Thats the big news to come out of this by-election.

    Is there any big news (or anything unexpected) in this by-election? I'm friends with a Labour campaigner who was all over Facebook last night, confident that it was in the bag (and she'd been over in Dunfermline campaigning).
  • Options
    smudges dadsmudges dad Posts: 36,989
    Forum Member
    angarrack wrote: »
    Yes, lets all talk about UKIP and the Greens.
    Thats the big news to come out of this by-election.

    No big news, but it confirms the Conservatives are supported by only 1:12 of people in Scotland and hardly anyone thinks UKIP is relevant.
  • Options
    CoolSharpHarpCoolSharpHarp Posts: 7,565
    Forum Member
    No big news, but it confirms the Conservatives are supported by only 1:12 of people in Scotland and hardly anyone thinks UKIP is relevant.

    No it doesn't... it confirms 1:12 of those who voted in Dunfermline supported the Conservatives.
  • Options
    davzerdavzer Posts: 2,501
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    trevgo wrote: »
    Very rare for me to relish a Labour victory, but very pleased to see the SNP get a bloody nose.

    It will cost me a hundred quid, but I'll happily swap my wager to see a distraught Salmond the morning after the referendum.

    What a saddo.
  • Options
    angarrackangarrack Posts: 5,493
    Forum Member
    No big news, but it confirms the Conservatives are supported by only 1:12 of people in Scotland and hardly anyone thinks UKIP is relevant.

    So you knew that the SNP were going to lose a lot of their support?

    Thats not what I expected judging from the various threads on Scottish politics here.

    That loss must be more than something to do with local politics in Dunfermline. If you are a Nationalist local issues aren't going to affect your beliefs.
  • Options
    smudges dadsmudges dad Posts: 36,989
    Forum Member
    angarrack wrote: »
    So you knew that the SNP were going to lose a lot of their support?

    Thats not what I expected judging from the various threads on Scottish politics here.

    That loss must be more than something to do with local politics in Dunfermline. If you are a Nationalist local issues aren't going to affect your beliefs.

    No, where have I said that?
  • Options
    BrokenArrowBrokenArrow Posts: 21,665
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    No big news, but it confirms the Conservatives are supported by only 1:12 of people in Scotland and hardly anyone thinks UKIP is relevant.

    I wonder why the conservative support is so low, is there an over reliance on state handouts up there?
  • Options
    thmsthms Posts: 61,009
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I wonder why the conservative support is so low, is there an over reliance on state handouts up there?

    did you mean food banks?
  • Options
    angarrackangarrack Posts: 5,493
    Forum Member
    No, where have I said that?


    You said that the result was "no big news".

    So I assumed from that you were expecting the SNP to lose a lot of their support.
  • Options
    BrokenArrowBrokenArrow Posts: 21,665
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    thms wrote: »
    did you mean food banks?

    No, I mean conservatives tend to have high support in affluent areas and Labour in depressed areas.

    So, I am asking what is the local economy like?

    Is there an over reliance on benefits?
Sign In or Register to comment.