Me "You've said that you don't think some people have the opportunity to vote.I've merely asked you to clarify that remark by stating who you think those people are."
You: "it actually looks like you asked something different if you have a read back. the answer to that question however is those who aren't currently eligible to vote. I'm sure you know who is eligible to vote, so the answer is everyone else"
So..... yeah. Like I said, probably best not to try to contradict yourself when the evidence is about 3 inches up on the same page.
i presume this is an admission you were wrong?
No. It was sarcasm.
and i'll take that as admission you are posting simply to argue? and contrary to myself being a WUM this is an admission of what you are doing?
That's fine as long as you accept that you have no right to complain if you get a government you don't like because it was collectively the fault of people who decided not to bother voting in the government they wanted.
What if they were disillusioned by both options/governments?
Comments
Oh, I have. Here is the section in question:
Me "You've said that you don't think some people have the opportunity to vote.I've merely asked you to clarify that remark by stating who you think those people are."
You: "it actually looks like you asked something different if you have a read back. the answer to that question however is those who aren't currently eligible to vote. I'm sure you know who is eligible to vote, so the answer is everyone else"
So..... yeah. Like I said, probably best not to try to contradict yourself when the evidence is about 3 inches up on the same page.
No. It was sarcasm.
See above.
What if they were disillusioned by both options/governments?