Mick and Stacey are destined to end up together. Stacey seems to understand Mick on a deeper level that Linda will never be able to. Two lost souls coming together and what do you get? SPARKS is what you get!!!
Hilarious. They are not destined to be together at all. Stacey should find someone single, rather than go for another married man. It would be a desperate storyline.
Hilarious. They are not destined to be together at all. Stacey should find someone single, rather than go for another married man. It would be a desperate storyline.
Of course they are destined. Does Mick look at Linda like he looked at Stacey? No!
Hilarious. They are not destined to be together at all. Stacey should find someone single, rather than go for another married man. It would be a desperate storyline.
Isn't the point of any paring on a Soap suppose to equivalent the most chemistry? Which Stacey and Mick seem to have a lot more off than he has currently has with Linda.
Isn't the point of any paring on a Soap suppose to equivalent the most chemistry? Which Stacey and Mick seem to have a lot more off than he has currently has with Linda.
Exactly. Also, Danny Dyer as the older man with the younger woman is very romantic and erotic.
I don't see the need to have every member of one family at forefront of various different storylines. In fact, I quite like that some drop into the background from time to time so that it's easier to take them in, especially when they're new.
The only issue I'd have with a Stacey/Mick affair is that it would undo everything they've done so far to portray him as a loyal family man.
I don't see the need to have every member of one family at forefront of various different storylines. In fact, I quite like that some drop into the background from time to time so that it's easier to take them in, especially when they're new.
The only issue I'd have with a Stacey/Mick affair is that it would undo everything they've done so far to portray him as a loyal family man.
Screw the 'family man' image. Soap operas are about conflict. Let's get the drama started for fooks sake.
There is much more long term characters (Roxy) that deserve more screen time than Nancy. Let the new characters blend in. I know the Carters have blended in quite well, but it's not as if they've been sat in the background without a SL for months. There's nothing urgently needed for Nancy right now.
There is much more long term characters (Roxy) that deserve more screen time than Nancy. Let the new characters blend in. I know the Carters have blended in quite well, but it's not as if they've been sat in the background without a SL for months. There's nothing urgently needed for Nancy right now.
Roxy needs getting rid of. More screen time for our Nance.
Yeah, Linda's having trouble accepting her son's sexuality, you know, because not everyone's perfect so she's the devil incarnate. So let's stick him with the cold blooded murderer who breaks up marriages and blames everyone else for her own problems. She's a nice girl.
Roxy needs getting rid of. More screen time for our Nance.
No she doesn't.
Roxy has been on the show for a few years now and we've established her tragic past but it's never been used. She, out of anyone deserves a big SL. Nancy's a lowlife chav that has had no development yet. Give the regular, deserving characters the big SL's. Let the newbies blend in. Nancy's in no immediate rush to have any big SL's ,she can wait.
Roxy has been on the show for a few years now and we've established her tragic past but it's never been used. She, out of anyone deserves a big SL. Nancy's a lowlife chav that has had no development yet. Give the regular, deserving characters the big SL's. Let the newbies blend in. Nancy's in no immediate rush to have any big SL's ,she can wait.
A lowlife chav?! What a ridiculous, classist thing to say about a potentially very interesting character. What has she done that warrants you calling her that, exactly?
A lowlife chav?! What a ridiculous, classist thing to say about a potentially very interesting character. What has she done that warrants you calling her that, exactly?
Err, just take a look at the wedding she was going to have 3 months ago
Err, just take a look at the wedding she was going to have 3 months ago
So not a chav so much as a rebellious girl who dumped the guy when she realised what he was really like? Yeah, proper lowlife there, having morals and self-respect and listening to her dad.
Roxy has been on the show for a few years now and we've established her tragic past but it's never been used. She, out of anyone deserves a big SL. Nancy's a lowlife chav that has had no development yet. Give the regular, deserving characters the big SL's. Let the newbies blend in. Nancy's in no immediate rush to have any big SL's ,she can wait.
Congratulations Matt - just when you couldn't sink any lower.
So not a chav so much as a rebellious girl who dumped the guy when she realised what he was really like? Yeah, proper lowlife there, having morals and self-respect and listening to her dad.
Did you even read my post?
I said she was lowlife because of her wedding where everyone turned up in tracksuits and stuff. Your post just then was irrelevant because it had nothing to do with what I'd just said?
A lowlife chav?! What a ridiculous, classist thing to say about a potentially very interesting character. What has she done that warrants you calling her that, exactly?
She's horribly chavvy. The way she goes on the attack when under siege. The use of using Johnnys sexuality as a weapon against him.
Congratulations Matt - just when you couldn't sink any lower.
Who do you think you are telling me what I can and can't post? My post just then was referring to a fictional character, and her behavior has hardly been the most classy now has it? Pipe down
Excuse me? Did I tell you what to post? I just said I was disgusted by what you have posted.
'Just when you couldn't sink any lower'
Acting as if I have a chain of nasty posts going on, or as if you're 'above' me. Err, well news flash. I don't have a chain of nasty posts going on at all, you're not 'above' me at all and this post was about a fictional character so there was nothing 'disgusting' about it at all. Stop looking for arguments.
Nancy's been on the show 3 months so "no development" is not an excuse to axe her. She's a new character. You have to give them a bit more time.
Let's get rid of Stan as well, he's only had 4 scenes altogether.
I'll use the Slater example again, did they cram all of their multitude of stories and development into their first 4 months? No, they built and developed over 5+ years.
Nancy's been on the show 3 months so "no development" is not an excuse to axe her. She's a new character. You have to give them a bit more time.
Let's get rid of Stan as well, he's only had 4 scenes altogether.
I'll use the Slater example again, did they cram all of their multitude of stories and development into their first 4 months? No, they built and developed over 5+ years.
if that comment's about mine, I didn't ever say she should be axed? I said she shouldn't be given massive SL's in any urgent rush
Comments
Hilarious. They are not destined to be together at all. Stacey should find someone single, rather than go for another married man. It would be a desperate storyline.
Still wouldn't put Stacey with Mick. I do not want them together and I actually like Linda and Mick together.
Of course they are destined. Does Mick look at Linda like he looked at Stacey? No!
Isn't the point of any paring on a Soap suppose to equivalent the most chemistry? Which Stacey and Mick seem to have a lot more off than he has currently has with Linda.
Exactly. Also, Danny Dyer as the older man with the younger woman is very romantic and erotic.
There is absolutely no way that Danny Dyer would object to the idea of sharing steamy scenes with Lacey Turner ;-).
The only issue I'd have with a Stacey/Mick affair is that it would undo everything they've done so far to portray him as a loyal family man.
Screw the 'family man' image. Soap operas are about conflict. Let's get the drama started for fooks sake.
Roxy needs getting rid of. More screen time for our Nance.
Ha ha! This made me laugh!
Roxy has been on the show for a few years now and we've established her tragic past but it's never been used. She, out of anyone deserves a big SL. Nancy's a lowlife chav that has had no development yet. Give the regular, deserving characters the big SL's. Let the newbies blend in. Nancy's in no immediate rush to have any big SL's ,she can wait.
A lowlife chav?! What a ridiculous, classist thing to say about a potentially very interesting character. What has she done that warrants you calling her that, exactly?
So not a chav so much as a rebellious girl who dumped the guy when she realised what he was really like? Yeah, proper lowlife there, having morals and self-respect and listening to her dad.
Congratulations Matt - just when you couldn't sink any lower.
I said she was lowlife because of her wedding where everyone turned up in tracksuits and stuff. Your post just then was irrelevant because it had nothing to do with what I'd just said?
She's horribly chavvy. The way she goes on the attack when under siege. The use of using Johnnys sexuality as a weapon against him.
She won't last.
Excuse me? Did I tell you what to post? I just said I was disgusted by what you have posted.
Acting as if I have a chain of nasty posts going on, or as if you're 'above' me. Err, well news flash. I don't have a chain of nasty posts going on at all, you're not 'above' me at all and this post was about a fictional character so there was nothing 'disgusting' about it at all. Stop looking for arguments.
Let's get rid of Stan as well, he's only had 4 scenes altogether.
I'll use the Slater example again, did they cram all of their multitude of stories and development into their first 4 months? No, they built and developed over 5+ years.