By demonstrating his naturally superior knowledge of a situation that he is personally invested in, while she is only reporting from the periphery? That really makes her stupid?
Kay Burley's sheer ineptitude never ceases to amaze, but Bryant is a typically arrogant, point-scoring media politician.
The line of questioning may have been of a nuisance to him but he could have just answered civilly. MPs these days get away with far too much, IMO.
Kay Burley's sheer ineptitude never ceases to amaze, but Bryant is a typically arrogant, point-scoring media politician.
The line of questioning may have been of a nuisance to him but he could have just answered civilly. MPs these days get away with far too much, IMO.
Totally agree with what you say about Bryant, I stated the same opinion earlier.
And his discretion about a constituent calling him - whatever the matter concerned, he should not have brought it up in the interview - total indiscretion as an MP.
Totally agree with what you say about Bryant, I stated the same opinion earlier.
And his discretion about a constituent calling him - whatever the matter concerned, he should not have brought it up in the interview - total indiscretion as an MP.
Ye cause obviously he only has one constituent and despite not saying what it was about and who it was he was talking to we all know due to what he said
Ye cause obviously he only has one constituent and despite not saying what it was about and who it was he was talking to we all know due to what he said
No, but that constituent could have been watching the interview on Sky, and mentioned to a third party that she had mentioned her plight in cofidence to Bryant, so a breach of trust on his part and an indiscretion.
Comments
Kay Burley's sheer ineptitude never ceases to amaze, but Bryant is a typically arrogant, point-scoring media politician.
The line of questioning may have been of a nuisance to him but he could have just answered civilly. MPs these days get away with far too much, IMO.
Good post!
Totally agree with what you say about Bryant, I stated the same opinion earlier.
And his discretion about a constituent calling him - whatever the matter concerned, he should not have brought it up in the interview - total indiscretion as an MP.
Ye cause obviously he only has one constituent and despite not saying what it was about and who it was he was talking to we all know due to what he said
No, but that constituent could have been watching the interview on Sky, and mentioned to a third party that she had mentioned her plight in cofidence to Bryant, so a breach of trust on his part and an indiscretion.
Nothing else to add.
Why?
This:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1028007/Pictured-The-incredible-moment-Sky-TV-presenter-Kay-Burley-grabbed-rival-throat.html
This:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pt_cUiCjggE&feature=related
Complete bias and Vileness.
And most predominately because of this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7CPrhn8_n5w
Horrible woman. :rolleyes:
One of the worst next to holly willobooby, fearne cotton, kate garraway, fiona phillips, christine blealkly & natasha kaplunksky.