[Ladyxxmacbeth]

Originally Posted by Regis Magnae

I prefer NV too.

In regards to FO4, 2013 is probably the earliest we'll ever see it if at all, unless Bethesda acquires or creates a new IP.

I prefer New Vegas too

[the_daddy]

Damn I really wish I hadn't sold either Fallout 3 or NV now.

[Jimmy_McNulty]

I bought FO3 on Christmas Day, i'm still yet to play it.

[Danger Close]

Originally Posted by megatron_man

you should do fallout 3 next......trust me! lol , while new vegas is good, it does not have the same "wow" as fallout 3, the combat is better yes...but in terms of atmosphere...it lacks big time!

The problem, I think, with NV is that it's far too open. The claustrophobia from F3 was nowhere to be found. Even the Vegas ruins, large chunks are taken up by McCarran and Crimson Caravan.
Vegas was meant to be largely untouched so there should have been more of the city to explore - like the D.C. ruins.

[Regis Magnae]

Originally Posted by Danger Close

The problem, I think, with NV is that it's far too open. The claustrophobia from F3 was nowhere to be found. Even the Vegas ruins, large chunks are taken up by McCarran and Crimson Caravan.
Vegas was meant to be largely untouched so there should have been more of the city to explore - like the D.C. ruins.

I preferred the openness myself. Granted New Vegas itself is quite small for a place that is the focus of the main quest for quite some time.