Quick question about TAP

[Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 445
Forum Member
If that Amy wasn't the real one then how come the goo version was pregnant?

Comments

  • MinkytheDogMinkytheDog Posts: 5,658
    Forum Member
    Duplicate wrote: »
    If that Amy wasn't the real one then how come the goo version was pregnant?

    She wasn't - and/or she was.

    The answer is - we don't know yet what made the Tardis give that whacky reading. It could be that the copy was a snaphot - it recreated the foetus but didn't know how to grow it (or simply wasn't capable) - or it could be that the copy was never pregnant and the scanner was picking up a partial reading from the real Amy due to some level of link between them (like the copy "seeing" the eye-patch woman even though it was really Amy looking at her) - the scanner could have been confused into "seeing" one Amy where there were two and only one was pregnant so it could only say that "she" was and wasn't at the same time.
Sign In or Register to comment.