Me neither. Last time was around the time Maggie T died.
Not that I was celebrating her death you understand. Despite Pwicey singing Maggie's praises in her column & likening herself to the iron lady. No, it just happened to coincide with a girlie night out.
Maggie & Pwicey , D The Iron Lady and the brassy trash.
Pwicey likening herself to the Iron Lady??? :eek:
Does she even know who the Iron Lady was and what she stood for?
link from April/2010 she didnt withdraw them until Nov/2010, apart from the odd snap shot, wonder what that rag would have to say now about all the public and filmed performances they have commercially been used in since then :rolleyes:
That was 3 years ago ..seriously :rolleyes:
Millions of mums put pics of their kids on twitter ..because they are proud of them and want to show off...it's normal
That was 3 years ago ..seriously :rolleyes:
Millions of mums put pics of their kids on twitter ..because they are proud of them and want to show off...it's normal
Its a bit different posting a picture of your children on Facebook to family and friends, and posting pictures of your children to 1,759,967 total strangers on Twitter :rolleyes: I would imagine her Twitter account has more followers than Peter has viewers for his show, infact i would imagine her Twitter account has more people following than those that actually go out and buy the media rags so she either wants them out of the public eye, or she doesn't.
Its a bit different posting a picture of your children on Facebook to family and friends, and posting pictures of your children to 1,759,967 total strangers on Twitter :rolleyes: I would imagine her Twitter account has more followers than Peter has viewers for his show, infact i would imagine her Twitter account has more people following than those that actually go out and buy the media rags so she either wants them out of the public eye, or she doesn't.
So she isn't allowed to be a parent now.. Bringing up a photoshoot from 3 years ago to slag her off is rediculous ..
Perhaps when her former husband agrees to a media ban she will not post pics..whilst he has them on his show week in week out I don't see the point of people slagging her off for posting a pic of her children ..Yet supporting him having them on his show ..double standards here
So she isn't allowed to be a parent now.. Bringing up a photoshoot from 3 years ago to slag her off is rediculous ..
Given the world we know live in, i would say being careful where we post pictures of our children is paramount, this is the woman that claims to have had a tracking device to her car, to be the victim of a kidnap ploy. And i was referring to the picture she posted of Junior on Twitter in the last few days.
Given the world we know live in, i would say being careful where we post pictures of our children is paramount, this is the woman that claims to have had a tracking device to her car, to be the victim of a kidnap ploy. And i was referring to the picture she posted of Junior on Twitter in the last few days.
Again whilst you support her former husband posting pics and having them on his show you are being a hypocrite ... Address all this to Peter as he is the one who shows them week in week out ..
So she isn't allowed to be a parent now.. Bringing up a photoshoot from 3 years ago to slag her off is rediculous ..
Perhaps when her former husband agrees to a media ban she will not post pics..whilst he has them on his show week in week out I don't see the point of people slagging her off for posting a pic of her children ..Yet supporting him having them on his show ..double standards here
There is no double standards here, she was the one jumping up and down about removing the children from the public eye, i even remember she thanked a national paper for pixelling the kids face's out, only for her to post pictures of her kids on Twitter within weeks of her announcement . Regardless of whether Pete removed them from his show or not, she could still have stuck to what she claimed she wanted, but she couldn't even do it herself. Please don't say, " well what's the point if Pete doesn't do the same" if she felt strong enough about it, she would have done it regardless of Pete, then she may have had an argument to throw around.
Again whilst you support her former husband posting pics and having them on his show you are being a hypocrite ... Address all this to Peter as he is the one who shows them week in week out ..
I am not the one claiming to have a problem with it, they are not my kids
I find it quite amazing that the same posters can post so many times on the same topics and for and against the same people. I do hope that the PR companies of both parties are taking notice and paying them the going rate, if not they should be.
I find it quite amazing that the same posters can post so many times on the same topics and for and against the same people. I do hope that the PR companies of both parties are taking notice and paying them the going rate, if not they should be.
I'm posting for free but if anyone wants to pay me I will happily take the payments
Betty, you are not taking note of the Katie Price guide to commercialism. Dont do anything for nowt. I am suprised as you have taken everything else about her to your generous heart.
But you are the one who is posting about it and complaining on here
I am complaining about Katie posting pictures of her children on Twitter to 1,759,970 total strangers, after making such a big song and dance about requesting that her kids be taken away from the public's glare.
Betty, you are not taking note of the Katie Price guide to commercialism. Dont do anything for nowt. I am suprised as you have taken everything else about her to your generous heart.
I am complaining about Katie posting pictures of her children on Twitter to 1,759,970 total strangers, after making such a big song and dance about requesting that her kids be taken away from the public's glare.
Exactly. It was KP who made all the fuss about removing the kids from her documentaries, so using them in photo shoots and tweeting photos of them for the whole world to see does seem a tad hypocritical. Either she thinks that the kids being in the public eye is wrong or she doesn't. She can't have it both ways.
Comments
Agreed...:cool:
I never have a clear head so a few vodkas won't make any difference
Pwicey likening herself to the Iron Lady??? :eek:
Does she even know who the Iron Lady was and what she stood for?
Katie Price @MissKatiePrice 15h
Junior and his pony mooney pic.twitter.com/9Tf6liFj9d
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1262497/Katie-Price-uses-children-Princess-Junior-plug-latest-fashion-line.html
@sxxxxxxg completely different I'm in control and not making money from them and its not a paid photo shoot
So SHE'S in control,so it all right to use them? Okaaaaay.:rolleyes:
She is deranged regarding comprehensible thought processes. That rat poison in her face has affected her brain I think.
Your link is from 1 April 2010 Is there anything more recent?
link from April/2010
That was 3 years ago ..seriously :rolleyes:
Millions of mums put pics of their kids on twitter ..because they are proud of them and want to show off...it's normal
Its a bit different posting a picture of your children on Facebook to family and friends, and posting pictures of your children to 1,759,967 total strangers on Twitter :rolleyes: I would imagine her Twitter account has more followers than Peter has viewers for his show, infact i would imagine her Twitter account has more people following than those that actually go out and buy the media rags so she either wants them out of the public eye, or she doesn't.
So she isn't allowed to be a parent now.. Bringing up a photoshoot from 3 years ago to slag her off is rediculous ..
Perhaps when her former husband agrees to a media ban she will not post pics..whilst he has them on his show week in week out I don't see the point of people slagging her off for posting a pic of her children ..Yet supporting him having them on his show ..double standards here
Given the world we know live in, i would say being careful where we post pictures of our children is paramount, this is the woman that claims to have had a tracking device to her car, to be the victim of a kidnap ploy. And i was referring to the picture she posted of Junior on Twitter in the last few days.
Again whilst you support her former husband posting pics and having them on his show you are being a hypocrite ... Address all this to Peter as he is the one who shows them week in week out ..
There is no double standards here, she was the one jumping up and down about removing the children from the public eye, i even remember she thanked a national paper for pixelling the kids face's out, only for her to post pictures of her kids on Twitter within weeks of her announcement . Regardless of whether Pete removed them from his show or not, she could still have stuck to what she claimed she wanted, but she couldn't even do it herself. Please don't say, " well what's the point if Pete doesn't do the same" if she felt strong enough about it, she would have done it regardless of Pete, then she may have had an argument to throw around.
I am not the one claiming to have a problem with it, they are not my kids
I'm posting for free but if anyone wants to pay me I will happily take the payments
But you are the one who is posting about it and complaining on here
I am complaining about Katie posting pictures of her children on Twitter to 1,759,970 total strangers, after making such a big song and dance about requesting that her kids be taken away from the public's glare.
At least it keeps this thread alive.
: how do you know I'm generous???
Which is so true, hence why Jordan is referred to as a compulsive liar....
Generous in believing in KPs motives.
Exactly. It was KP who made all the fuss about removing the kids from her documentaries, so using them in photo shoots and tweeting photos of them for the whole world to see does seem a tad hypocritical. Either she thinks that the kids being in the public eye is wrong or she doesn't. She can't have it both ways.