Options
Joanna - I don't like her.
The Rhydler
Posts: 4,494 Forum Member
✭✭✭
Why do people rate her, she's an aggressive bully. Her treatment of Jamie last night was despicable and Nick, an eyewitness, should have brought that up.
The way she lambasted him and humiliated him was atrocious and then accusing HIM of being aggresive when he finally snapped. I detest people like her and I hope deeply that she does not win this show. She hasn't contributed as much as people think and leeches onto other more talented candidates and eats at their glory as if it were her own
Liz was 50 times the candidate Joanna is, there's just no justice that Jo is still in, and smugging it back at the house afterwards with her assertion that its time for Stuart to go - no it's time for YOU to go.
The way she lambasted him and humiliated him was atrocious and then accusing HIM of being aggresive when he finally snapped. I detest people like her and I hope deeply that she does not win this show. She hasn't contributed as much as people think and leeches onto other more talented candidates and eats at their glory as if it were her own
Liz was 50 times the candidate Joanna is, there's just no justice that Jo is still in, and smugging it back at the house afterwards with her assertion that its time for Stuart to go - no it's time for YOU to go.
0
Comments
We've all met people like her in the workplace - not very bright but get by by shouting longer and louder than everyone else.
I better not do a Louis Walsh and dare SUGGEST that Joanna looks like someone who is also black, LOL.
However I still think she is by far the best candidate even if she has gone down slightly in my estimations. I fully disagree that she leeches on other candidates as she's the most proactive candidate there (if anything that's her problem, she's so proactive that she bulldozes her way through at times when she has an idea). And I certainly don't think Liz was better than her even if she might be a nicer person.
I thought it was humiliating myself.
She is not 'by far' the best candidate. That comment has no basis at all. Replace 'best' with 'worst' and your nearer the mark.
She felt threatened - by Jamie? Pffft!
She's the kind of employee that makes work hell.
Oh, I just wanted Nick to really shut her up at that point, he should step in sometimes!
Um other than the fact she has the best record out of all the candidates left. 7 wins with 2 as PM and only once brought back to the boardroom is pretty impressive. You don't have to agree with me (hence why I wrote 'I think' instead of saying it was an objective fact) but I certainly wasn't making the comment without basis :rolleyes:
Joanna & Stella have 7 wins each. Both have been winning PM twice. Both been on the losing team 3 times with Stella being called back into the boardroom twice* and Joanna once.
*Of which one was in task #10 (last night) when there were only three in each team and so by default was in the boardroom as her team lost.
(On a different note, it was funny watching the snippets of next weeks episode, where Joanna is interviewed. I actually ended up feeling quite sorry for her, even if she only really has herself to blame for being made to look stupid.)
Oh dear. Am assuming you mean the mini clip on the Apprentice site? Not done her homework. Basic stuff really.
Yeah - that's the one. Now that was a "sinking feeling" moment.
I agree - going off her now.
OMG I wanted to swing at her myself - I know people like that and it's just so bloody annoying.
Yes this bit really angered me - LOL - HER - scared of Jamie - she was obviously doing that for effect and it was very annoying.
I agree with this. The first confrontation with Jamie and Joanna - wasn't really aggressive - though she tried to imply it was by saying she felt 'intimidated'.
The second confrontation was much more aggressive IMO. I do think that Stuart started that and tried to make more of it than it was.
Good for Chris in the boardroom and his 'handbags at dawn' comment - really liked that.
And her constant whingeing - out next week, thank goodness.
Indeed. Fail to prepare and all that. Though there are worse things to fall down on in the scheme of things.
I just beleive that she's been lucky. It is possible to be lucky. She's worked alongside the better candidates more often than not
I agree a candidate can be on the winning team quite a few times and not contribute much, therefore avoiding the BR. Slipping under the radar if you like. I do think though that she been one of the better candidates and been prepared to get her hands dirty so to speak.