Shall we address the elephant in the room? The limited entertainment value in having
aussie_dave_
Posts: 717 Forum Member
✭✭
.. a dog on BGT?
Im sorry but every year its. OK a dog who can stand on his legs and walk around. A dog who can walk between your legs. A dog who can jump on your back.
Its kinda the same ol thing. Everytime I see a dog act now I just think. 'Ive seen it all before'.
If they could train a cat to do the same, then I'd be impressed.
Im sorry but every year its. OK a dog who can stand on his legs and walk around. A dog who can walk between your legs. A dog who can jump on your back.
Its kinda the same ol thing. Everytime I see a dog act now I just think. 'Ive seen it all before'.
If they could train a cat to do the same, then I'd be impressed.
0
Comments
http://www.doneldaguy.co.uk
As opposed to the absolute "gold" that the rest of the show presents as entertainment? :rolleyes:
MEOW!!!!
lol. Only tugging your leg! You have a point.
My cat high fives me. Shall I take him on?
The child acts are by far the worst thing about the show, in my opinion.
Compared to those dogs, "dancing" dogs are just made to look silly.
Do you know what, I really have to agree with this.
I think they should have a Junior BGT & keep kids separate from adults.
Cruel ... but funny!!:):)
This suggestion always comes up as if it'll solve all of the show's problems, but it's a pretty flawed idea in itself - why are adults implicitly more talented than kids? Would you say Shaheen Jafargholi, for example, is less talented than Darth Jackson?
I don't think some acts should be forced into a watered-down version of the show (which let's face it, it would be - it'd become all about who's 'cute' rather than who's good) just because of their age. The real problem lies in the fact that the judges don't say no to cute young dance troupes/comedians with little talent.
The voters never really seem to play along, though - considering the amount that make it to the semi-finals, the finals don't tend to be completely full of kids, and those that do make it are usually talented, rather than relying on the cute factor. So I wouldn't say the kid thing is as much of an issue as people make out.
Another issue - what about acts with some children and some adults? The children shouldn't be made to leave their group & excluded from participating in the 'proper' version of the show purely because they've not had as many birthdays.
I just think the judges should stop putting mediocre little kids and 'funny' (:rolleyes:) joke acts through. If there isn't enough talent left once they do that, the show has clearly run its course.
Likewise people saw the dog or whatever it was in the first series do well and that dog Gin in the other series so now all the dog acts come out of the cracks and on to BGT. Same with dance groups.
2 dogs instead of 1 is refreshing and may make for some more interesting chereography, but there isn't a lot a dog can do to wow me anymore after seeing it done the first time.
Shall we address the pointlessness of endless dance troupes on the show?
Gin was the first dog. The second dog was Chandi.
They were both great (Gin slightly ahead of Chandi) and far more entertaining than dance troupes and children whose parents think they're a million times better than they are.
Ahaha, wasn't meant to be snippy at you. Just at the show in general.
I love dogs, but I recognise your point.
And ironically enough, I came home from work yesterday evening and my mum had paused a part she wanted me to see... Yep you guessed it. Was the one with the two dogs lol!
...and a separate one for dogs also.
I mute the TV then multitask anytime a four legged creature comes on.
I never said that adults were necessarily more talented than kids - I just think it would be nicer for the kids to have their own show. But yes I agree there would have to be a compronise of some sort where acts involved both adults and children.
I also agree the judges should be more responsible as to who they put through (they're the ones most guilty of falling for the "cutsey" acts) & the silly jokey acts. I believe there is enough talent in the UK apart from those - I just don't think that a lot of genuinely talented people want to be associated with the show.