How come it's ok for people to want to change their gender but not their sexuality?

HogeyzHogeyz Posts: 1,086
Forum Member
✭✭✭
I was watching the programme "Cure me, I'm gay" by Dr Christian Jessen, and like most right minded people I was horrified at the baseless and, lets be honest, bigoted "cures" for homosexuality. Like Christian Jessen I believe that sexuality is a spectrum and that your sexual preference is something you are born with and that you should just be who you are, and be proud of it.

However this got me thinking, although I find the notion that someone would want to change their sexuality as unnecessary and wrong, people change their gender quite often and people are more often than not supportive. Your gender is, if anything, more easily definable than your sexuality, so why the difference in attitude to people wanting to change it?

I have no problem with people getting sex changes, to each their own, but for example if a male friend said he was getting a sex change, he would probably receive support, however if a gay friend suggested he wanted to become straight, I imagine the response would be less than supportive.

Why do people think there is such a difference?
«13

Comments

  • lightdragonlightdragon Posts: 19,059
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    On a very simple level I think it comes down to "what is more important, the brain or the body"?

    To which I would say the brain is, and it's probably better to adapt the body to fit the brain, than adapt the brain to fit the body.
  • sodavlacsodavlac Posts: 10,607
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I don't think it's seen as changing their gender, more becoming what they always and already really were.

    Edit: That said, there have been people who were born and lived as one gender, identified and lived as another gender for a while then went back to living as and identifying as their original gender. They couldn't have been becoming what they always were deep-down.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 3,373
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Because they're not changing their gender - gender is not the same thing as sex.
  • DinkyDoobieDinkyDoobie Posts: 17,786
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I thought the same thing. If someone is unhappy being gay and wants to be straight aren't the people convincing them to be gay the "witch doctors".
  • Melody.ExEMelody.ExE Posts: 67
    Forum Member
    echad wrote: »
    Because they're not changing their gender - gender is not the same thing as sex.

    I might be wrong, but I thought sex was biological (and can't be changed without an operation) but gender is in the brain, and is what people 'change'. (Although I agree with a poster above who said they don't really 'change' and it's more understanding how they've always been?)

    I don't know for sure, because it's not something I've personally been through, but I do think Sex, Gender, Sexual Orientation and Romantic Orientation are all different things, and don't always sync up.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 929
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Gay people can only become straight if they want the help which is being offered. If you don't want the help then you'll find it difficult.
  • edExedEx Posts: 13,460
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Hogeyz wrote: »
    I was watching the programme "Cure me, I'm gay" by Dr Christian Jessen, and like most right minded people I was horrified at the baseless and, lets be honest, bigoted "cures" for homosexuality. Like Christian Jessen I believe that sexuality is a spectrum and that your sexual preference is something you are born with and that you should just be who you are, and be proud of it.

    However this got me thinking, although I find the notion that someone would want to change their sexuality as unnecessary and wrong, people change their gender quite often and people are more often than not supportive. Your gender is, if anything, more easily definable than your sexuality, so why the difference in attitude to people wanting to change it?

    I have no problem with people getting sex changes, to each their own, but for example if a male friend said he was getting a sex change, he would probably receive support, however if a gay friend suggested he wanted to become straight, I imagine the response would be less than supportive.

    Why do people think there is such a difference?
    People who change their gender change it to the one they've always felt it to be. Inside, nothing is changing.
    3sweet5u wrote: »
    Gay people can only become straight if they want the help which is being offered. If you don't want the help then you'll find it difficult.
    Gay people cannot become straight. They can only act as if they were straight, like a left-handed person can force themselves to use their right hand even though they're still really left-handed.
  • lightdragonlightdragon Posts: 19,059
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I thought the same thing. If someone is unhappy being gay and wants to be straight aren't the people convincing them to be gay the "witch doctors".

    That's a good point. I think people should be accepted in whichever way they choose to identify. However there's little to no evidence that altering the brain to make you straight can actually be done.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 3,373
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Melody.ExE wrote: »
    I might be wrong, but I thought sex was biological (and can't be changed without an operation) but gender is in the brain, and is what people 'change'. (Although I agree with a poster above who said they don't really 'change' and it's more understanding how they've always been?)

    I don't know for sure, because it's not something I've personally been through, but I do think Sex, Gender, Sexual Orientation and Romantic Orientation are all different things, and don't always sync up.

    You can't ever change your sex. It's in your DNA. You can change your phenotype but not your chromosomes.

    You're right about gender not being a physical thing, that's exactly what I mean when I say that people don't change their gender. It seems like they do, when they start telling people about being trans and changing their appearance, but that stuff is just external - they never identified with the gender they were assigned in the first place. They're not changing from it, because they never were it in the first place.

    It's analogous to thinking that a person has changed from straight to gay when they come out - they were never straight in the first place.
  • Wise BadgerWise Badger Posts: 781
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I think people should be able to do what they like with their own life.

    If someone wants to change their sexuality, then it's their life so it's not for anyone else to comment. People should just mind their business all round.
  • AneechikAneechik Posts: 20,208
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    People are entitled to change their brain just as much as they are entitled to change their body. The problem is one of professional standards as the only therapy available to change sexuality not only doesn't work, but is based on treatments that were discredited decades ago and which are not accepted by any legitimate medical professional.
  • KapellmeisterKapellmeister Posts: 41,322
    Forum Member
    I'm not sure why people are so squeamish about a 'gay cure'. If someone is gay and wants to be 'cured' of it then what is the issue? Of course any 'cure' would have to have a scientific basis, e.g. a pill, laser treatment on the brain, whatever, but I don't see it as a moral/ethical issue at all. People are allowed by society to change whatever they want to so why not sexuality?
  • KapellmeisterKapellmeister Posts: 41,322
    Forum Member
    Aneechik wrote: »
    People are entitled to change their brain just as much as they are entitled to change their body. The problem is one of professional standards as the only therapy available to change sexuality not only doesn't work, but is based on treatments that were discredited decades ago and which are not accepted by any legitimate medical professional.

    Exactly! It's the nature of the cures that is the issue not the notion of a cure itself.
  • BirdyBeeBirdyBee Posts: 1,528
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Well...I thought that some people only wanted to change their sexuality because of society and cultural pressures and prejudices. Do straight people undergo treatment to try and become gay?

    Whereas, some people want to change their gender because they identify with the opposite gender and feel like they are in the wrong body. Even if that means they will face prejudice.

    So, I feel in the former case, it is done because outside influences have made them unhappy in who they are. That makes me feel uncomfortable. Terming it as a 'cure' makes me more so.

    In the latter, they are doing it for themselves and not because of anyone else. That seems fair enough.

    But that might be oversimplifying it.
  • November_RainNovember_Rain Posts: 9,145
    Forum Member
    I think it boils down to the fact that someone who changes sex isn't changing who they are, because deep down that's who they were all along, as a general rule.

    If someone wants to change their sexuality from gay to straight then chances are they are uncomfortable being themselves and they are trying to escape the prejudice that comes with it, which is quite sad really.
  • Big Boy BarryBig Boy Barry Posts: 35,377
    Forum Member
    No one changes their sexuality. It's inherent to them. It simply takes a while for some to realise what it actually is. Nothing wrong with that, but framing it as a "cure" is warped, bigoted and baseless.
  • AlrightmateAlrightmate Posts: 73,120
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Hogeyz wrote: »
    I was watching the programme "Cure me, I'm gay" by Dr Christian Jessen, and like most right minded people I was horrified at the baseless and, lets be honest, bigoted "cures" for homosexuality. Like Christian Jessen I believe that sexuality is a spectrum and that your sexual preference is something you are born with and that you should just be who you are, and be proud of it.

    However this got me thinking, although I find the notion that someone would want to change their sexuality as unnecessary and wrong, people change their gender quite often and people are more often than not supportive. Your gender is, if anything, more easily definable than your sexuality, so why the difference in attitude to people wanting to change it?

    I have no problem with people getting sex changes, to each their own, but for example if a male friend said he was getting a sex change, he would probably receive support, however if a gay friend suggested he wanted to become straight, I imagine the response would be less than supportive.

    Why do people think there is such a difference?

    I used to think so, but I'm not so sure now.
    Maybe it is something that can change over the course of your life.
    It seems to be a human perception that you have to be either this or that. Maybe nature doesn't work with labels and your sexuality can perhaps change quite naturally.

    But I don't think it's something you can make change. Even if you could it wouldn't be something I'd support.
  • Si_CreweSi_Crewe Posts: 40,202
    Forum Member
    TBH, I don't really object to the idea of somebody genuinely wanting to change their sexuality.

    I worry that a person might feel compelled to do it for flawed reasons but, then again, I'd have the same concerns about a person who wants gender surgery too.

    I kinda wonder if the idea of a sex-change is a little too, erm, simplistic.
    I mean, if a tall person was utterly convinced that they should be short, would we endorse a decision to undergo surgery to achieve that or would it be better to try and convince them that being tall is okay?
    I'm not saying we should try to convince transgender people that they should try to alter their sexuality to match their body but maybe we should consider that maybe we should consider that it's okay to just be a female brain in a male body (or vice versa)?

    Bottom line, though, is that if a person genuinely wants to tinker with their body or their mind, best of luck to them.
  • marjanglesmarjangles Posts: 9,668
    Forum Member
    I'm not sure why people are so squeamish about a 'gay cure'. If someone is gay and wants to be 'cured' of it then what is the issue? Of course any 'cure' would have to have a scientific basis, e.g. a pill, laser treatment on the brain, whatever, but I don't see it as a moral/ethical issue at all. People are allowed by society to change whatever they want to so why not sexuality?

    Homosexuality isn't a disease so the notion of a cure is absurd and deeply offensive. The only reason people want to change sexuality is because of outside influence to change so it's not a question of what they want but what they feel forced to do. That makes it a moral issue.
  • Slarti BartfastSlarti Bartfast Posts: 6,607
    Forum Member
    Has this "female brain in a male body" thing actually been proved? It's something I've never really been able to get my head around. How do we know it isn't a delusion? If it was any other aspect of themselves (say, a small person believing they're tall on the inside, or a white person believing they're black on the inside) we would tend to think they are delusional, since their belief is incongruous with reality. With gender we appear to have created a notion (the idea that gender is unconnected to physiology) by which we can make reality fit their belief. Could we just as easily say that height or race is unconnected to physiology?
  • MAWMAW Posts: 38,777
    Forum Member
    Exactly! It's the nature of the cures that is the issue not the notion of a cure itself.

    And quite possibly the deception involved in giving the treatment, and the element of coercion that seems often to be present. The whole thing stinks, basically.
  • KapellmeisterKapellmeister Posts: 41,322
    Forum Member
    marjangles wrote: »
    Homosexuality isn't a disease so the notion of a cure is absurd and deeply offensive. The only reason people want to change sexuality is because of outside influence to change so it's not a question of what they want but what they feel forced to do. That makes it a moral issue.

    Neither is having large breasts but plenty of women want breast reduction ops (or vice versa).

    Actually the more I think about this the more irritated I am by the presumption that it's perfectly fine for people to change whatever they want but if someone wants to change their sexuality it suddenly becomes a massive "moral issue".
  • KapellmeisterKapellmeister Posts: 41,322
    Forum Member
    MAW wrote: »
    And quite possibly the deception involved in giving the treatment, and the element of coercion that seems often to be present. The whole thing stinks, basically.

    Yes, I agree. But that is criticising the nature and implementation of the 'cures' not the the idea of a 'cure' itself.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 3,373
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Has this "female brain in a male body" thing actually been proved? It's something I've never really been able to get my head around. How do we know it isn't a delusion? If it was any other aspect of themselves (say, a small person believing they're tall on the inside, or a white person believing they're black on the inside) we would tend to think they are delusional, since their belief is incongruous with reality. With gender we appear to have created a notion (the idea that gender is unconnected to physiology) by which we can make reality fit their belief. Could we just as easily say that height or race is unconnected to physiology?

    Yes, there is evidence. In areas of cognition where differences between the sexes are apparent, trans people show brain activity consistent with cisgender controls of the same gender as them, not the same sex. In other words trans men's brains behave like cisgender men's brains, even though they are biologically female. And vice verse for trans women.

    Pretty much suggests that this activity is affected by gender, not sex. That of course doesn't rule out environmental influence because the brain is plastic - it will reorganise itself based on new input. So it doesn't mean that being trans was set in stone, but it at least physically corroborates how trans people describe their mental experiences.

    On your other point: gender is inherently not the same thing as sex - this has always been the case, it's just that now society is more open to acknowledging that than covering it up. If gender followed sex perfectly, then we would already have had three categories of gender identity for many years: male, female and intersex. But intersex people have been pushed into identifying as men or women throughout history, because gender is a social construct. If it followed biology perfectly then that would not have happened.

    I think this notion makes some people uncomfortable because gender can be such an important part of our identity that we think of as being in our DNA. It can be difficult for people to acknowledge that they have been shaped by society's structures - takes away their sense of control.
  • pickwickpickwick Posts: 25,739
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Yeah, I think people have hit most of the reasons it's treated differently - the cures don't work, the subjects are often compelled or deceived, etc. Also, in contradiction of the general assumption, I think relatively few transgender people actually have genital surgery - it's more about presentation and hormones and what gender you're living as than just about your genitalia. So in that way it's not directly analogous to the "if someone thought they only had one leg would we amputate the other one" question.
Sign In or Register to comment.