Wish we could have a new IAC with all the ones voted out so far
kate03
Posts: 4,036 Forum Member
✭✭✭
Leave the current celebs in to get on with it because it's just a drama show.
I would love a brand new show with all the celebs who've been voted out. Maybe then we'll get some entertainment with none of the he/she is a bully/bitching/picking on Amy.
The current IAC should be renamed to "Did they or did they not bully the beauty queen Amy?" Every celeb being interviewed on the ITV2 show is revolving around her storyline.
It's like a new TOWIE or Geordie Shore instead of IAC. So sick of how our reality shows are evolving into drama and theatrics and editing to support one or two characters.
I would love a brand new show with all the celebs who've been voted out. Maybe then we'll get some entertainment with none of the he/she is a bully/bitching/picking on Amy.
The current IAC should be renamed to "Did they or did they not bully the beauty queen Amy?" Every celeb being interviewed on the ITV2 show is revolving around her storyline.
It's like a new TOWIE or Geordie Shore instead of IAC. So sick of how our reality shows are evolving into drama and theatrics and editing to support one or two characters.
0
Comments
Thank you Granny. I think it's time I switched off from these shows. They really are becoming a joke. Let the twitter brigade win.
Lol...ok then it's a deal.:D
I'd have to go with that - I really don't like the woman.
I hope the producers read this forum and this thread. Maybe then they'll get the message that we're not all happy with their current shambolic editing.
I'm glad to be rid of most of those who are out and am not convinced by the conspiracy theories about the edit.
The only one I miss at all is Vincent.
I hope the producers are wise enough to ignore this forum, as the Big Brother producers should have avoided the BB one. (They advise housemates to avoid it, though.)
I was convinced by the 'biased' edit by week two when the ITV2 show were showing very funny clips (the beauty pageant one for example) that was not shown on the main show. Sure they have to edit it all down to a one hour show, but when they begin to pick and choose pieces to throw certain celebs into a bad light and make them look totally unreasonable, that's when you begin to notice who they are favouring or who they want out. Matthew made a very valid point of an example of this tonight with the incident about Rebecca.
So call it conspiracy if you wish. I don't think I'm far off the mark.
I couldn't stand to watch IACGMOOHN but I know we see far less of camp than we used to. They showed a segment the other day about all the bugs and reptiles that had come into the camp and thought I would rather see some of that than some of what we are shown.
I don't think you are far off the mark either. Manipulation at it's finest.
I did notice when Matthew said something along the lines, that basically Joey was the favourite (of the show) to win from day one etc (I can't remember what he said exactly) but Laura was quick to jump in and that topic stopped.
That's because Matthew is a really sore loser. The show didn't make Joey the favourite or vote for him to do the trials, the ( TOWIE ) public did and the show did not cause Mathew to lose the trials to Joey...........He was just second best to the TOWIE font of all knowledge.
Yes I noticed that too. To confirm my suspicions, we've just had Steve Davis on This Morning saying that Lucy and Matthew were hilarious and also worked hard around the camp. He also said that Joey and Kian had good chances of winning. Philip and Holly looked gobsmacked when Steve mentioned Lucy and Matthew in a positive light and asked if Steve was their PR agent because they've seen nothing of that on the main show.
ITV editing is really out of order this series and they've gone with a highly exaggerated dramatic storyline that barely matches up to the evicted celebs experiences in the camp. I for one am disappointed that we seen none of this hilarity around the camp.
I'm with you on this one too.
I'm fed up with 'the vultures' picking the meat off of the bones of a certain individual (who isn't even my fav). I would rather see them having some fun and entertaining me. I don't feel entertained by folk continually running others down (whoever that my be). That's not my idea of entertainment.
Of course, you don't expect it to be all harmonious, but dear Lord, enough is enough.
Mo calling Amy a word that they felt too disgusting to broadcast for instance was stepping over the mark imo. Totally uncalled for.
It must have been bad, because they didn't bleep out any F words etc previously.
This is just my own opinion though.
That's a questionable way to put it. Should they hide the things that make those celebs look bad instead, and pretend they're all fun and games when they're not?
I'm not convinced there's been much hilarity. Steve seemed to think his wind-ups were immensely funny; it's far from clear it would seem that way to viewers.
I don't think any of them have said anything interesting.
The usual claim is that we're left with "bores" when it's voting to evict (as traditionally in Big Brother) and that voting to save (as in IAC) is the way to get rid of the bores and keep the interesting ones in.
Perhaps most viewers just have a different idea of who's worth watching and would rather watch those who are left than those who are out. That's certainly how I feel. The only evictee I miss at all is Vincent. If we were shown the evictees having fun with their families, I'd turn it off.
Of course, it comes down to taste and opinion.
BIB It isn't down to the viewers who stays, it's down to those who're prepared to waste money on voting. Most of us just go with the flow and really don't care who ends up with a bunch of twigs on their head.
I am also completely fed-up with the misogynistic 'jealous' storyline, rendering most of the threads on this forum completely unreadable. If anyone is being bullied behind their back it is Lucy.