Options

Antichrist

24

Comments

  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 7,305
    Forum Member
    Not at my local Odeon lol. The local arthouse cinema is getting it though, so all is good in my little world. :)

    It's on at Cineworld Sheffield from Friday, so i'll be going to see it ASAP before the Daily Mail readers start jumping on the bandwagon and it gets pulled.
  • Options
    UltraVioletUltraViolet Posts: 7,673
    Forum Member
    I doubt that will happen.
  • Options
    EraserheadEraserhead Posts: 22,016
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I admire LvT because he's not afraid to really mess with accepted cinema conventions and to push the boundaries - the whole Dogme thing produced a number of excellent films by him and others - but I have to admit I find his films hard going sometimes. Dogville seemed to go on forever and Breaking the Waves was ponderously slow.

    Still, I'm keen to see Antichrist, although I don't think my OH would be impressed. Might have to see that one by myself :)
  • Options
    AdsAds Posts: 37,062
    Forum Member
    Anyone been to see this yet?
  • Options
    Eye SeaEye Sea Posts: 4,366
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    JCR wrote: »
    ...The film was classified '18' for strong real sex, bloody violence and self-mutilation...

    Very much doubt it's real sex...:rolleyes:
  • Options
    UltraVioletUltraViolet Posts: 7,673
    Forum Member
    Not between the leads, but the doubles yes. Why so hard to believe?
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 767
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Lars von Trier's only talent is self publicity. I really do not rate his movies at all. It all seems so forced and "see how clever this is"
  • Options
    UltraVioletUltraViolet Posts: 7,673
    Forum Member
    Not even Dancer in the Dark? it's fantastic.
  • Options
    elite fileselite files Posts: 15,602
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Kirkfnw wrote: »
    Kevin1960 wrote: »

    Porn stars acted the close up shots.

    you mean stiffed it up?:D:p
  • Options
    CornucopiaCornucopia Posts: 19,440
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Saw this at the weekend. It is harrowing stuff.

    As usual with LvT, the emphasis is on theme and acting, though this is set in "the real world" rather than in the stage sets of Dogville and Manderlay. I saw it at Cineworld Haymarket, and the digital projection was excellent. The very cinematic scenes at the start of the film were absolutely stunning.

    I'm not whether LvT is sexist in his films, or whether he simply has a poor view of both men and women. In a sense...
    WdF's character brought the violence upon himself by suggesting that the child being made to wear shoes on the wrong feet may have been an element in his death.
  • Options
    JCRJCR Posts: 24,076
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Eye Sea wrote: »
    Very much doubt it's real sex...:rolleyes:

    It's very real sex. In black and white, with the Rinaldo: Lascia ch'io pianga aria by Handel playing. Highly artistic ****ing in close up. Bravo, 10/10. ;)
  • Options
    klaeresourceklaeresource Posts: 793
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Eye Sea wrote: »
    Very much doubt it's real sex...:rolleyes:

    The BBFC have passed a number of films over the past few years at 18 that contain unsimulated sex so your "roll eyes" makes you look a bit of an idiot
  • Options
    KirkfnwKirkfnw Posts: 1,613
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    The BBFC passed the X-rated version of Caligula last year which is basically an R18 movie but with an 18 certificate. You can get it at Blockbuster. And yes you see everything.
  • Options
    JCRJCR Posts: 24,076
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    And the new empire mag says In the Realm of the Senses is being re released on August 28th. It's very naughty. :o
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 7,305
    Forum Member
    I saw this yesterday and i liked it. The graphic penetration shot at the start really wasn't necessary and just seemed to be there for controversies sake. However, the whole film was beautifully filmed and the two leads acted brilliantly, a scene of Willem Dafoe walking behind a coffin near the start was particularly empathetic. The story was also very clever and definitely not for people who have short attention spans. At my screening there were quite a few walk outs, and the general reaction from the audience at the end seemed to be negative, but if you go in expecting a tightly wound psychological thriller that treats the viewer as an adult then you should walk away satisfied.

    I'm not too sure that the talking fox was such a good idea though, pretty much everyone thought that was hilarious.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 917
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    ^^ agree with the randomness of the graphic penetration at the start, I think the scene would have been just as, if not more powerful without it.

    The talking fox was just... I couldn't help but laught at that point.
  • Options
    slapmattslapmatt Posts: 2,359
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Does anyone know where you can find a list of cinemas this is released at? It doesn't seem to be on at any of the big cinemas near me.
  • Options
    JCRJCR Posts: 24,076
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    slapmatt wrote: »
    Does anyone know where you can find a list of cinemas this is released at? It doesn't seem to be on at any of the big cinemas near me.

    http://www.artificial-eye.com/film.php?cinema=antichrist&where=antichrist&plugs&qt=false&wm=false
  • Options
    iamhumaniamhuman Posts: 2,197
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    DVD Screener is now so since Eastenders isnt on tonight...i know what ill be watching!
  • Options
    UltraVioletUltraViolet Posts: 7,673
    Forum Member
    Eastenders has never been on television on a Wednesday night for years... :p
  • Options
    iamhumaniamhuman Posts: 2,197
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Oh look at you fancy pants knowing all the tv listings for today!
  • Options
    UltraVioletUltraViolet Posts: 7,673
    Forum Member
    Yes it's very hard to forget: Eastenders - Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday... :p
  • Options
    ViridianaViridiana Posts: 8,017
    Forum Member
    I really liked the movie. Although i think that in some parts the violence went for far to long.

    I laughed at the fox and the bird, i do not think they were detrimental to the movie.

    And it's DEFINITELY NOT worse than Salo, Salo is a class of his own.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 7,305
    Forum Member
    Viridiana wrote: »
    And it's DEFINITELY NOT worse than Salo, Salo is a class of his own.

    I've been thinking about watching Salo actually, is it any good? Part of me wants to watch it, but after reading that it has scenes were people actually eat excrement i'm not so sure (obviously it's not REAL excrement, but it's just the thought of it. The sick eating scene in Audition made me queasy as it is!). Does it actually have a story to it or is it just humiliation and torture for the sake of it?
  • Options
    JCRJCR Posts: 24,076
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    CJClarke wrote: »
    I've been thinking about watching Salo actually, is it any good? Part of me wants to watch it, but after reading that it has scenes were people actually eat excrement i'm not so sure (obviously it's not REAL excrement, but it's just the thought of it. The sick eating scene in Audition made me queasy as it is!). Does it actually have a story to it or is it just humiliation and torture for the sake of it?

    I don't think Salo is worth the effort, no. It does have a point, but if you are in any way unsure about it, I wouldn't bother.

    The shit eating isn't the worst part (there are several rape scenes).
Sign In or Register to comment.