Corrie's use of CGI to flop?
It occurred to me today that even with the Mill being such a refutable company with CGI work, the fact that Corrie is, and always has, broadcast interlaced is going to potentially make the effects look incredibly fake. :eek:
A quick bit of info for those unfamiliar with the technicalities (I only just understand it myself so anybody geekier than me can happily correct me!):
Corrie and EastEnders do not look like "films" like other dramas because they are shot and broadcast in interlaced format. Many shows shoot in this format, but most, in post production, deinterlace to give off the effect of film or glossy drama (think Holby City, Doctor Who, etc)
With regard to the tram crash, this is really difficult, because some people will hit the roof if Coronation Street starts looking visually like a film/Doctor Who, but without it, the CGI is probably going to be embarrassing. You saw how bad the CGI tram was for Natasha's exit - think that but for a massive CGI tram crash! :eek:
To reiterate, shows like Doctor Who are shot interlaced and then deinterlaced in post production, and that's why the CGI works well (most of the time).
I think I'd honestly prefer Corrie to switch to deinterlaced and have a visually pleasing experience. It could be temporary, for the week of episodes, or a permanent switch for the 50th.
What are people's thoughts on this?
A quick bit of info for those unfamiliar with the technicalities (I only just understand it myself so anybody geekier than me can happily correct me!):
Corrie and EastEnders do not look like "films" like other dramas because they are shot and broadcast in interlaced format. Many shows shoot in this format, but most, in post production, deinterlace to give off the effect of film or glossy drama (think Holby City, Doctor Who, etc)
With regard to the tram crash, this is really difficult, because some people will hit the roof if Coronation Street starts looking visually like a film/Doctor Who, but without it, the CGI is probably going to be embarrassing. You saw how bad the CGI tram was for Natasha's exit - think that but for a massive CGI tram crash! :eek:
To reiterate, shows like Doctor Who are shot interlaced and then deinterlaced in post production, and that's why the CGI works well (most of the time).
I think I'd honestly prefer Corrie to switch to deinterlaced and have a visually pleasing experience. It could be temporary, for the week of episodes, or a permanent switch for the 50th.
What are people's thoughts on this?
0
Comments
I prefere real stunts.
It looked very real though.
I think EE have done well with their CGI.
Watch the trains on video two
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/eastenders/2010/02/get-your-anoraks-on-trains-are.shtml
...WHAT? I understand CGI, Broadcasting Formats, Ratio Standards, etc but reading the OP has even confused me because it's all very hatched together information that's wrong.
Ok, where to even begin, Deinterlacing is not the Filmic effect, that's actually a different filter process. De-Interlacing is just that, De-Interlacing and making it Progressive. But that doesn't matter here, in Europe, ANY HD content we watch is broadcasted Interlaced (1080i) and your TV (Or receiver if you have that option set) is the thing doing the De-Interlacing.
i HAD TO ADMIT THAT WAS AMAZING, IT LOOK SOO REAL!
Since I'm clearly so ignorant and misinformed, would you like to explain if Coronation Street's CGI will be hampered by its broadcast format please?
Deinterlacing has nothing to do with the filmic effect.
The filmic effect is nothing more than a tacky post production add on
The Mill (NYC) were responsible for Barclaycard's New York rollercoaster advert.
That looked good, so I'll reserve my judgement for the episodes, when they air.
The Mill are an amazing company. Just check out pretty much any episode of Doctor Who 2005-10. They will have a solution. And I'm guessing they are doing this for ex-Who producer, Phil Collinson, as a favour, i.e. not at full cost, so as to keep within Corrie budget.
>clears throat<
In the 90's, the de-interlaced "film look" was occasionally used and it looked awful. Witness the botched Casualty episodes back then.
This has the effect of taking 50 interlaced images per second and effectively making them 25 fps. The phoney jerkiness is suddenly apparent
Sometimes this de-interlacing effect is used to dreadful effect - such as when a band perform on T4, or the current Neighbours on Five.
Proper film-look is achieved in camera by shooting in progressive mode, or applying it during grading in post-production (NEVER on transmission, which is what these other failures do)
Witness the film-like quality of Shameless or the League of Gentlemen - both shot on video.
Corrie is currently shot in 1080i 50 frames per second interlaced video.
My guess would be that the actual crash, which is reality would take a matter of seconds, will be played in slow motion, which will blend the CGI tram and the background nicely. Once the tram is at rest, it's a live set.
Shall we all just wait and see what they do? Then if they mess it up we can all come on and slag it off, as DS forums do so well.
PS: It is my view that a show which is already running, and has an established style using interlaced video should NEVER be taken forward to progressive, because the visual style is SO different. Holby, Casualty, The Bill etc etc... many shows suffer from this.
Soaps do not suit progressive..... interlaced video provides the immediacy required from such a medium.
My guess is at the moment of impact they'll probably only use the CG tram for a few quick distance shots, and use a combination of close-ups, stuntwork with perhaps CG-explosions and lighting for the rest of it. They might impose some CG debris to make it look more realistic.
1 million pounds sounds just about right for the price of those shots, so I think Corrie fans will be in for a treat.
Not sure what the video-format has to do with it. Crappy CGI will look crap regardless and likewise with good.