Home› Sport› The Olympic Games
Options

Team GB are rubbish - 0 golds!!!

1…1112141617…66

Comments

  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 82,262
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #327
    sparkplugs wrote: »
    I wonder how long we can keep this thread going for? :confused::rolleyes:

    for 4 more golds untill we beat our Beijing total.
  • Options
    charliesayscharliesays Posts: 1,367
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #328
    Remarkable thing is that if we discount the swimming totally, then we have more medals than the US in terms of both golds and total number.

    Yes I know we could say take cycling away etc etc and we can prove any argument, but it does show an astonishing depth to the GB team.

    Very, very proud.
  • Options
    tiger2000tiger2000 Posts: 8,541
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #329
    cudzndrips wrote: »
    Just luck mi thinks! You wait til the drug tests are revealed!
    You Bitter Bastard.

    Take The Shame!
  • Options
    Mikes MikeMikes Mike Posts: 1,822
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #330
    charliesays wrote: »
    Remarkable thing is that if we discount the swimming totally, then we have more medals than the US in terms of both golds and total number.

    Yes I know we could say take cycling away etc etc and we can prove any argument, but it does show an astonishing depth to the GB team.

    Very, very proud.

    We also have more medals per population (or something like that) in comparison to the USA and China.
  • Options
    Department_SDepartment_S Posts: 4,924
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #331
    I want to start a handball appreciation thread but I'm not sure how many are following. It's a great sport. GB don 21-8
  • Options
    KJ44KJ44 Posts: 38,093
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #332
    Popping in to my favourite thread just to rub it in. :D
  • Options
    exlordlucanexlordlucan Posts: 35,375
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #333
    cudzndrips wrote: »
    Just luck mi thinks! You wait til the drug tests are revealed!


    Go buy yourself a two piece jigsaw puzzle, it will occupy your time for the week ahead.
  • Options
    Randomguy83Randomguy83 Posts: 16,879
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    #334
    cudzndrips wrote: »
    Just luck mi thinks! You wait til the drug tests are revealed!

    You think wrong :p. Just admit you were wrong and stop digging yourself further into a hole.
  • Options
    Beau_SoirBeau_Soir Posts: 1,811
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #335
    KJ44 wrote: »
    Popping in to my favourite thread just to rub it in. :D

    And me...go team GB!!!:D
  • Options
    Union JockUnion Jock Posts: 7,262
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #336
    cudzndrips wrote: »
    China already has 9 golds and the host country has zero. We can only barely manage a bronze. Team GB should be ashamed of thermselves!:mad:

    Proven wrong I see.


    cudzndrips wrote: »
    Just luck mi thinks! You wait til the drug tests are revealed!

    No you wait because you'll be getting more flak for there being zero results.

    This hole of yours is getting deeper and deeper.
  • Options
    Mark.Mark. Posts: 84,926
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #337
    For all the claims of "troll", I strongly suspect we are in a scenario not too dissimilar to this:

    http://lol.i.trollyou.com/ (warning: contains naughty words)
  • Options
    BelligerenceBelligerence Posts: 40,613
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #338
    How many golds now?
  • Options
    Mark.Mark. Posts: 84,926
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #339
    Belligerence wrote: »
    How many golds now?
    17, only two off Beijing.

    Jason Kenny goes in the cycling sprint final in about 45 minutes; here's hoping it's 18 by the end of the day.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 50
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #340
    Real possibility we could end up with between 25 and 27 golds. Cycling this evening important if we are to do this.

    Updated list of remaining gold medal prospects at: www.teamgbmedals.weebly.com
  • Options
    sparkplugssparkplugs Posts: 510
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    #341
    Why can't we just let this thread RIP already? :confused::rolleyes::D
  • Options
    TouristaTourista Posts: 14,338
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    #342
    sparkplugs wrote: »
    Why can't we just let this thread RIP already? :confused::rolleyes::D

    Stop posting then.......:D
  • Options
    BelligerenceBelligerence Posts: 40,613
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #343
    Mark. wrote: »
    17, only two off Beijing.

    Jason Kenny goes in the cycling sprint final in about 45 minutes; here's hoping it's 18 by the end of the day.
    18 it is. :D
  • Options
    mossy2103mossy2103 Posts: 84,308
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #344
    Belligerence wrote: »
    18 it is. :D

    Not bad for a rubbish team!
  • Options
    ZeusZeus Posts: 10,459
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    #345
    Another exceedingly lucky day today for team GB! Congrats to the showjumping team and to Jason Kenny!
  • Options
    daziechaindaziechain Posts: 12,124
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    #346
    This must be the most Golds a rubbish team has ever won .. I wish we were rubbish more often :D
  • Options
    KJ44KJ44 Posts: 38,093
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #347
    Just popped in to be smug.

    I love this thread for its superabundance of widescreen fail.
  • Options
    Andrew_BallardAndrew_Ballard Posts: 1,054
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #348
    cudzndrips wrote: »
    China already has 9 golds and the host country has zero. We can only barely manage a bronze. Team GB should be ashamed of thermselves!:mad:

    quoting for the lulz
  • Options
    Rich Tea.Rich Tea. Posts: 22,048
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #349
    Mikes Mike wrote: »
    We also have more medals per population (or something like that) in comparison to the USA and China.

    China's population is 22 times the size of GB's. Therefore per head of the population we are so far ahead it's embarrassing. 18 Golds multiplied by 22 is actually an equivalent 396 Golds! :eek:
  • Options
    d'@ved'@ve Posts: 45,531
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #350
    Rich Tea. wrote: »
    China's population is 22 times the size of GB's. Therefore per head of the population we are so far ahead it's embarrassing. 18 Golds multiplied by 22 is actually an equivalent 396 Golds! :eek:

    Yes, and on the same basis, New Zealand's 3 Golds is equivalent to 1,008 Gold Medals so far! :eek: :D

    Love this thread though, one of the most epic fails ever seen in DS history and that's saying something!
  • Options
    DynopiaDynopia Posts: 1,645
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #351
    Times and Guardian predicting 72+ medals overall and 25/26 gold.

    I'm just happy we should cross the 20 gold and 50 overall, 25 gold and 70 overall would be immense!
Sign In or Register to comment.