No. She is as entitled as Sam is to take the money. Why is Sam not getting the flack too?
The question isn't asking if she's entitled to it, the question is asking if she's a hypocrite for taking it.
I don't see why Sam would be a hypocrite so I don't see why she would get any flak.
No. She is as entitled as Sam is to take the money. Why is Sam not getting the flack too?
She hasn't been banging on about all week and telling others what they should and shouldn't do. Chloe has said that adding to the prize fund is most important.
She said "we are a team". Wasn't a team there was you Chloe?
In a way yes. 5k is better than spending it on stupid things like a pizza though, so I get her point. I don't blame her for taking it, I don't think any of them deserve the prize money, a share is just as fair imo and I think those mad at her (Danny) is mad they didn't get the chance or think the prize is theirs already.
Absolutely! she has slated Jack for "thinking" of taking money out for results, she has told everyone that they are a team increasing the prize fund for the wilnner, then first chance to increase her bank balance.... O.K. Thankyou!!
yes as Chloe has been horrible to all other housemates for taking from the prize fund - crikey she was'nt happy about Sam and Jack spending £100.00 each for their suitcases but is happy to take £5000.00 for heself
I dint think she did look stupid. Like she said 70k for the winner is a MASSIVE amount of cash. As she and Jack said to them 5k is 5months wages which to some is a life changing amount, in jacks case pay of his debts in her case who knows but who's honestly ever had the chance of 5 months wages tax free? I think it was a fair call in her part, cause it's not being wasted on a pizza or football.
No...she's not a hypocrite. she wasn't taking it out of the prize fund ... It was offered to her fair and square, and as she said she assumed they were all being offered it, so that would have effectively made it an equal playing field.
I dint think she did look stupid. Like she said 70k for the winner is a MASSIVE amount of cash. As she and Jack said to them 5k is 5months wages which to some is a life changing amount, in jacks case pay of his debts in her case who knows but who's honestly ever had the chance of 5 months wages tax free? I think it was a fair call in her part, cause it's not being wasted on a pizza or football.
It wasn't her call to make, she bullied Jack to retract his bid yet it's okay for her to take £5k because it's cold hard cash
She has given everyone a hard time yet no one is allowed to give her a hard time:o you reap what you sow. The HMs had every right to question her decision and what does she do, cry so they will back off. She's a hypocrite, no two ways about it.
No...she's not a hypocrite. she wasn't taking it out of the prize fund ... It was offered to her fair and square, and as she said she assumed they were all being offered it, so that would have effectively made it an equal playing field.
yes as Chloe has been horrible to all other housemates for taking from the prize fund - crikey she was'nt happy about Sam and Jack spending £100.00 each for their suitcases but is happy to take £5000.00 for heself
I'm beginning to think that our posts must be invisible to the people STILL asking why Chloe is getting stick for her actions.
It's perfectly obvious, but even if they somehow missed what happened, lots of people have filled in the details, and STILL they claim not to get it.
Perhaps she shouldn't have protested so much when others wanted to take from the prize fund
As she was selfish and not clever enough to foresee that she might get a money opportunity, she's her self to blame
What we know about her is she changes her mind when it's something that benefits her.
Guilt trip in progress from her then , and using that old chestnut ," it's a lot of money "etc. Playing the vulnerable woman speaking in a child-like voice ,and shedding tears , the mugs in the clique are back feeling sorry for then. ^_^
>>> until the next time she argues.
She's a hypocrite and when money in front ,she thought about herself and was most inconsistent with what she'd told the house , and what they should do when faced with spending the money - its my way or I'll have a tantrum
The question isn't do you think she should have taken it/do you begrudge her taking it.
I agree. I think most hms don't object to her taking the money, neither do I. But its the way she's been going on and on all week about the money being for the winner and that anyone taking anything for themselves are selfish. I can't stand her and hope she goes
I'm beginning to think that our posts must be invisible to the people STILL asking why Chloe is getting stick for her actions.
It's perfectly obvious, but even if they somehow missed what happened, lots of people have filled in the details, and STILL they claim not to get it.
I sadly have to agree with you. You get a totally different poster on the night time. Those who aren't clued up about what's happening. It's a lot more on the ball during the day I find. But then people have places to go. It would be interesting to get a survey of what sort of people are on at what time.
Comments
The question isn't asking if she's entitled to it, the question is asking if she's a hypocrite for taking it.
I don't see why Sam would be a hypocrite so I don't see why she would get any flak.
She said "we are a team". Wasn't a team there was you Chloe?
Because Sam has been judging others and acting like a control freak all week.
Because Chloe has been giving others hell for taking away potential cash from the prize fund. Sam has been much more quiet about it.
Nothing is wrong with taking the money, it's more to do with how Chloe conducted herself before opportunity for the 5k was presented.
She's a complete hypocrite.
The question isn't do you think she should have taken it/do you begrudge her taking it.
Was she entitled to take the money? Yes of course she was but it just makes her look stupid after everything she has said.
Obviously because Sam hasn't berated everyone else like Chloe has all week for even daring to think about taking anything.
It wasn't her call to make, she bullied Jack to retract his bid yet it's okay for her to take £5k because it's cold hard cash
She has given everyone a hard time yet no one is allowed to give her a hard time:o you reap what you sow. The HMs had every right to question her decision and what does she do, cry so they will back off. She's a hypocrite, no two ways about it.
Of course she's a hypocrite:o
I'm beginning to think that our posts must be invisible to the people STILL asking why Chloe is getting stick for her actions.
It's perfectly obvious, but even if they somehow missed what happened, lots of people have filled in the details, and STILL they claim not to get it.
As she was selfish and not clever enough to foresee that she might get a money opportunity, she's her self to blame
What we know about her is she changes her mind when it's something that benefits her.
Guilt trip in progress from her then , and using that old chestnut ," it's a lot of money "etc. Playing the vulnerable woman speaking in a child-like voice ,and shedding tears , the mugs in the clique are back feeling sorry for then. ^_^
>>> until the next time she argues.
She's a hypocrite and when money in front ,she thought about herself and was most inconsistent with what she'd told the house , and what they should do when faced with spending the money - its my way or I'll have a tantrum
Im surprised you had to ask!!!
I agree. I think most hms don't object to her taking the money, neither do I. But its the way she's been going on and on all week about the money being for the winner and that anyone taking anything for themselves are selfish. I can't stand her and hope she goes
I sadly have to agree with you. You get a totally different poster on the night time. Those who aren't clued up about what's happening. It's a lot more on the ball during the day I find. But then people have places to go. It would be interesting to get a survey of what sort of people are on at what time.