Options
How should they change the judging process?
MD1500
Posts: 14,234
Forum Member
✭✭
How about this?
Every week, the *three* acts with the least public votes face the judges choice....
The judges vote "Weakest link" style by writing the names down of the act they want to save on cards. There is no discussion, no conferring, and the twist is, judges may NOT vote for their own act. All judges MUST vote.
The judges reveal the names of who they want to save by turning over the cards at the same time.
Once the act is saved, the public votes are revealed. Of the two contestants remaining, the act with the least votes goes.
However, if an act is in the bottom three for three weeks, that means that the public officially hate them and they are expelled automatically. The judges have no opportunity to save them.
Every week, the *three* acts with the least public votes face the judges choice....
The judges vote "Weakest link" style by writing the names down of the act they want to save on cards. There is no discussion, no conferring, and the twist is, judges may NOT vote for their own act. All judges MUST vote.
The judges reveal the names of who they want to save by turning over the cards at the same time.
Once the act is saved, the public votes are revealed. Of the two contestants remaining, the act with the least votes goes.
However, if an act is in the bottom three for three weeks, that means that the public officially hate them and they are expelled automatically. The judges have no opportunity to save them.
0
Comments
The show should then be required to publish the viewers vote at the end of each show. There was all that whoha about competition enteries and the 'don't phone now or your vote wont be counted but you may still be charged' thing. But if peoples votes are being disegarded or manipulated to ensure who they want to keep on the show stays. That's as big a con in my book.
Basically, when those running the show are used to having control and making sure things go their way, there's no way they will give up that kind of power lightly.
The only way to change things imo, is if the public stop spending on votes, yet it's obvious that even while complaining about fixing, plenty still spend their money filling the pockets of SC.