Options

BBC All male comedy panel shows to go

135

Comments

  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 888
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    The only thing that worries me about this is having a higher chance of hearing Gina Yashere make a obviously HILARIOUS joke where Nigeria is the punchline.
  • Options
    sheff71sheff71 Posts: 8,286
    Forum Member
    Making such a public statement as this doesn't do the BBC or female comics any favours - any females on such shows in future may now feel they're only on there just to make up the quota, and not because they're funnier than a Flanagan or a Parsons...

    I can't comment on Buzzcocks as I stopped watching that a few years ago when it lost it's way, but Mock The Week seems to have female and/or ethnic guests regularly, some are very funny and some just are very poor...as are some of the white blokes on there.

    The balance on the show probably isn't helped as you have Dara, Andy, Hugh and (usually) Chris as regulars leaving just three spaces for rotating guests... in the last series (series 12), of the 11 regular shows, there were five with a female presence. They usually like to have a one liner specialist on there (such as Milton Jones, Stewart Francis or Gary Delaney), who do tend to be men.

    While that might not sound a lot, it probably is a reflection of the significantly higher number of male stand-up performers out on the circuit in comparison to females?
  • Options
    sheff71sheff71 Posts: 8,286
    Forum Member
    The only thing that worries me about this is having a higher chance of hearing Gina Yashere make a obviously HILARIOUS joke where Nigeria is the punchline.

    I thought that too, but apparently Gina hasn't been on MTW since 2009!

    The more frequent female performers on there in recent years have been Andi Osho, Ava Vidal, Holly Walsh and Katherine Ryan (who seems to have been on quite a few shows lately).
  • Options
    lundavralundavra Posts: 31,790
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    There was an Englishperson, Irishperson and Scotsperson on a panel show....

    What about the Welsh, can I complain somewhere?
  • Options
    Monty_HallMonty_Hall Posts: 1,111
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Katherine Ryan is great.

    Up to a little while ago, I'd only seen her on panel shows. But then I saw her stand-up act - Live at the Apollo, I think. It was great.

    Don't have a problem with having a mix of people on panel shows. Does it always have to be the same faces, though? Sue Perkins - I am talking about you.
  • Options
    zz9zz9 Posts: 10,767
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    UKNikey wrote: »
    This is shocking news! :o

    It means that dreadful woman Sarah Ferkin Millican will never be off the BBC and will have a job for life.

    Surely this enough to end the licence fee for good.

    Tht Millican woman needs to go to America to 'make it big' now.

    I'm sure they coud have her.

    Please please please BBC think again,

    Surely all BBC panel shows are also under represented by the LGBT community, so we need one of each on the panel to reach the agenda targets.

    BAN MILLICAN NOW.

    QI surely helps them meet their "quota". Not only host Fry buy Sandi Toksvig and Sue Perkins, both excellent guests, are regulars and help meet quotas in two groups!
  • Options
    zz9zz9 Posts: 10,767
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Goneril wrote: »
    Comedy should never be defined by gender... comedy ,is just comedy. I cannot think of a single comedienne I'd pay to see,I can think of several comedians that I would.

    Playing devils advocate, but maybe that's because you haven't seen enough female comedians on TV? If they did start featuring more then you might see a few that you would want to go and see?
  • Options
    zz9zz9 Posts: 10,767
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    It almost makes me shudder to think what the woman who would replace clarkson would look like :o

    This weeks Top Gear ended with Jeremy promising to change his name by deed poll to Jennifer if the Porsche was faster than the McLaren.

    That's one way to meet the female quota!
  • Options
    ElMarkoElMarko Posts: 5,224
    Forum Member
    zz9 wrote: »
    Playing devils advocate, but maybe that's because you haven't seen enough female comedians on TV? If they did start featuring more then you might see a few that you would want to go and see?

    Ding ding ding! We have a winner.
  • Options
    ste likes boobsste likes boobs Posts: 677
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I'm fairly certain that the next female guest on MTW will get ribbed constantly for being the 'token woman'.
  • Options
    zz9zz9 Posts: 10,767
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I'm fairly certain that the next female guest on MTW will get ribbed constantly for being the 'token woman'.

    They should just put Dara in a blonde wig.
  • Options
    td1983td1983 Posts: 2,679
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    ElMarko wrote: »
    This thread is predicitably awful, filled with people moaning about political correctness, people moaning about women not being funny so that's why they aren't on, and people asking "what's the problem?"

    And that's really what I expected, given that we live in a heavily patriarchal society, and also because of things like cronyism - ie, ever wondered why the same acts get on telly all the time, or suddenly somebody becomes famous overnight. Here's a hint: it's not on merit.

    I took the liberty of finding some links that everybody here should read/listen/watch before commenting further:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IYx4Bc6_eE - Stewart Lee on political correctness (which should really be renamed "don't be a dick" because that's all PC is really. Not being a dick to people. It's not hard.)

    http://www.cracked.com/blog/4-ways-were-programmed-to-think-women-arent-funny/ - Very interesting discussion about women and humour and men and how they respond to it.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/comedy/news/stewart-lee-is-not-amused-at-monopoly-control-of-tv-comedy-8477824.html - More Stewart Lee, talking about the close-knit community/revolving door between production companies and comedians and TV/Radio.

    There's shedloads more information out there, and it may be worth people actually doing some research before commenting on things that they have absolutely zero knowledge about.

    It's *incredibly* hard to see the world from the point of a view of a woman if you aren't one, because you don't understand your own privileged position.

    And your post is predictable in its misandrist undertones. Women have far more rights now than ever before (you could say too many), what century are you living in?
    As for the topic, well-a couple of Guardianista Feministas complain, and the BBC do their, ahem, classically politically correct thing! Although I myself don't usually watch panel shows, I can't stand the smug, aren't-we-all-oh-so-funny posturing from the celebrities on them.
  • Options
    StrakerStraker Posts: 79,657
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    ElMarko wrote: »
    There's shedloads more information out there, and it may be worth people actually doing some research before commenting on things that they have absolutely zero knowledge about.

    It`s the same faces because most have the same, incredibly successful, agent so it`s got nothing to do with sex.
  • Options
    ElMarkoElMarko Posts: 5,224
    Forum Member
    Straker wrote: »
    It`s the same faces because most have the same, incredibly successful, agent so it`s got nothing to do with sex.

    You're right, but they are two different problems. One is a problem with comedy in general. The other is a problem with everyday society.
  • Options
    ElMarkoElMarko Posts: 5,224
    Forum Member
    td1983 wrote: »
    And your post is predictable in its misandrist undertones. Women have far more rights now than ever before (you could say too many), what century are you living in?
    As for the topic, well-a couple of Guardianista Feministas complain, and the BBC do their, ahem, classically politically correct thing! Although I myself don't usually watch panel shows, I can't stand the smug, aren't-we-all-oh-so-funny posturing from the celebrities on them.

    FYI I'm a man (not that it matters, just saying for context really). I just want my kid to grow up in an equal society where their sex doesn't determine what they can and can't do in life.

    Guess that makes me a proper arsehole, right?
  • Options
    dtorredtorre Posts: 3,736
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Why do we 'need' more women on TV? All these panel shows seem to be popular enough and bring in good ratings so what is the 'need' for such tokenism? Because of this PC crap, a male comedian will miss out on a place on a panel show because he is the 'wrong' gender - that is clear sexism. I hope BBC receives complains for this sexism, they have been infected with a feminist agenda for too long now
  • Options
    StrakerStraker Posts: 79,657
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
  • Options
    DragonQDragonQ Posts: 4,807
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    This is quite frankly ludicrous. There are far more made comedians of a decent enough level to appear on shows like this, so how is this even going to be possible? QI is a great example: there have been many female guests over the years (I assume Jo Brand has the most appearances) but there are also many, many episodes with all men. Who cares?
    ElMarko wrote: »
    FYI I'm a man (not that it matters, just saying for context really). I just want my kid to grow up in an equal society where their sex doesn't determine what they can and can't do in life.

    Guess that makes me a proper arsehole, right?
    Do you seriously believe that having a woman on each comedy panel show episode has anything to do with equality? It doesn't. Equality is about equal treatment and equal opportunity, not arbitrary quotas.
  • Options
    ElMarkoElMarko Posts: 5,224
    Forum Member
    dtorre wrote: »
    Why do we 'need' more women on TV? All these panel shows seem to be popular enough and bring in good ratings so what is the 'need' for such tokenism? Because of this PC crap, a male comedian will miss out on a place on a panel show because he is the 'wrong' gender - that is clear sexism. I hope BBC receives complains for this sexism, they have been infected with a feminist agenda for too long now

    There's no way society can switch to treating people fairly and equally in one go. I don't really agree with "affirmative action" (which is what this is actually called, if you're not familiar with the term) but until we reach a time in human history where we don't decide on somebody's role as soon as their born due to the status of their genitals, it's the best method we've got to try and right hundreds of years worth of wrongs.

    But the fact that we have to try and do things like this really does say a lot about the problems we have in society.
  • Options
    ElMarkoElMarko Posts: 5,224
    Forum Member
    DragonQ wrote: »
    This is quite frankly ludicrous. There are far more made comedians of a decent enough level to appear on shows like this, so how is this even going to be possible? QI is a great example: there have been many female guests over the years (I assume Jo Brand has the most appearances) but there are also many, many episodes with all men. Who cares?

    Wow, it's almost as if women aren't given the chance so you're only ever seeing men and think that that is the status quo.

    It's all very circular and reinforcing.
  • Options
    ElMarkoElMarko Posts: 5,224
    Forum Member
    DragonQ wrote: »
    Do you seriously believe that having a woman on each comedy panel show episode has anything to do with equality? It doesn't. Equality is about equal treatment and equal opportunity, not arbitrary quotas.

    It won't change overnight, though, so until then we'll have to try something else.

    Maybe in a few generations time when we're all more progressive, sure, we can try the "treat everyone equally" way of doing things (and I'd love that) but until then, it's not really possible.
  • Options
    lundavralundavra Posts: 31,790
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    ElMarko wrote: »
    FYI I'm a man (not that it matters, just saying for context really). I just want my kid to grow up in an equal society where their sex doesn't determine what they can and can't do in life.

    Guess that makes me a proper arsehole, right?

    I would much rather they be selected on ability though on those grounds many of the male comedians would not be on the programmes either!
  • Options
    DragonQDragonQ Posts: 4,807
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    ElMarko wrote: »
    Wow, it's almost as if women aren't given the chance so you're only ever seeing men and think that that is the status quo.

    It's all very circular and reinforcing.
    ElMarko wrote: »
    It won't change overnight, though, so until then we'll have to try something else.

    Maybe in a few generations time when we're all more progressive, sure, we can try the "treat everyone equally" way of doing things (and I'd love that) but until then, it's not really possible.

    Oh I'm sure crony-ism exists with this kind of thing, as it does nearly everywhere. That doesn't mean a quota will fix the issue, or even help. "Affirmative action" is just "positive discrimination" renamed to sound better (like "intelligent design" instead of "creationism").

    The fact that there are fewer top-tier female comedians doesn't necessarily mean women are disadvantaged in the first place. That should be demonstrated before any action is even considered. Maybe it has been, I dunno. In any case, giving someone a position based on their gender, race, or anything else that is irrelevant, might actually make progress less likely, as people start to believe that women need artificial help to get these jobs or feel bitter about losing out on opportunities because they don't fill quotas.

    The solution, as it often seems to be, is simply education. MPs are a good example: having 50:50 male:female MPs makes sense on the face of things, but actually most people would prefer the best candidate to have the job. If you want more female MPs you need to encourage more women to get engaged in politics, so the pool is large enough for gender to not be an issue on a large scale. Just having a quota doesn't help anyone. Politics is totally broken anyway but that's another thread. :D
  • Options
    ElMarkoElMarko Posts: 5,224
    Forum Member
    DragonQ wrote: »
    Oh I'm sure crony-ism exists with this kind of thing, as it does nearly everywhere. That doesn't mean a quota will fix the issue, or even help. "Affirmative action" is just "positive discrimination" renamed to sound better (like "intelligent design" instead of "creationism").

    The fact that there are fewer top-tier female comedians doesn't necessarily mean women are disadvantaged in the first place. That should be demonstrated before any action is even considered. Maybe it has been, I dunno. In any case, giving someone a position based on their gender, race, or anything else that is irrelevant, might actually make progress less likely, as people start to believe that women need artificial help to get these jobs or feel bitter about losing out on opportunities because they don't fill quotas.

    The solution, as it often seems to be, is simply education. MPs are a good example: having 50:50 male:female MPs makes sense on the face of things, but actually most people would prefer the best candidate to have the job. If you want more female MPs you need to encourage more women to get engaged in politics, so the pool is large enough for gender to not be an issue on a large scale. Just having a quota doesn't help anyone. Politics is totally broken anyway but that's another thread. :D

    Hmm.

    Finding it hard to disagree with this post. Damnit. >:(
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 1,225
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Absolute madness this will mean we will be watching shows which won't feel like the guests want to be there I can't see J Clarkson wanting to carry on with top gear if he's forced to present

    I can see what shows will do do is move channels I think mock the week QI etc should go to either Ch4 or Ch5

    If shows guests are going to be put together rather than people actually wanting to be there then it's wrong
    And loose women etc all women shows should be banned aswell if you going to have a mix then every show should be mixed
Sign In or Register to comment.