Options
What Is The Point of More 4?
zandar
Posts: 929
Forum Member
✭✭
It looks like More 4 shows new programmes before many of them eventually reach Channel 4. More 4 is only available in HD to viewers who subscribe to Virgin or Sky meaning, that anybody with Freeview or Freesat, would be watching these programmes in standard definition. Why on earth would Channel 4 wish for the 'free' viewers to be watching their new shows in SD? As I fall into this category, I will certainly not be watching More 4 and will wait for these programmes to appear on Channel 4 in HD.
0
Comments
More4's docs are more varied from history, war, monachy, natual disasters, food & drink etc.
Also they do fill it up with regualr C4 fodder as well.
Hang on. So this is basically asking why we can watch something for free in SD first, or maybe in HD if we pay extra. But we can view it anyway. I love HD and truly detest fuzzy vision but am stuck as to why this should be an issue
Just like they have had E4HD locked up for years and will never make it free. All these companies (ITV very much included) should decide what they are a free channel or a pay channel, not both. And so typical that behind it all is grubby little Sky with it's buy up everything and then fleece everyone. (Even the BBC's F1 is included in that!)
Something for the more mature mind, something more indepth, documentaries aswell as chances to catch C4 shows again if they fit with More4 and what the channel is about.
As for the complaint about its SD version being FTA but the HD version not being -
Sky paid for it, if it wasn't for the money Sky pay, More4HD wouldn't be on air, same for E4HD.
Plus, it's the same over at ITV, with the SD versions of 2, 3 & 4 being FTA but the HD versions being pay. The only difference is that ITV created the HD versions as another way to make money!
Why would you wish for Channel 4 to be unable to make those new programmes?
They are a commercially-funded broadcaster so a loss of income — such as by selling the carriage of HD versions of their channels exclusively to pay-TV operators — means they have less to spend on content.
The majority of Freeview channels are only available in SD, I believe the platform can only accommodate ten separate broadcast HD streams, and most people are still willing to watch them.
Until such a time enough people refuse to watch in SD, so that the loss of advertising revenues becomes greater than the carriage fees, then broadcasters are not going to start a crazy bidding war over very limited capacity just to make their HD channels free.
So, you still watch the programmes, and Channel 4 still receive the same total audience. Then what is the problem?
This thread should not be called "What is the point of More 4?," when it is clearly a successful channel helping fund the corporation's PSB commitments, but "Why is More 4 not aimed specifically at me and my particular whims?"
Like many other "fringe channels" More 4 does have some good programmes now and again, it doesn't bother me that it's not on FreeView in HD.
Yes, I would be watching 'Hidden Villages' tonight but made the mistake of seeing it on More 4 when the first series went out. I then found a couple of months later that it was shown on CH 4 - which having Freeview/Freesat , I can have in HD. So, if I watch it tonight, I will be seeing it with inferior picture quality. I therefore refuse to watch More 4 and now don't even bother looking at the programme listings for this channel. I resent the fact that Channel 4 would have me watch a show in SD just so they can get some revenue for making the channel HD on pay channels. If all 'free' viewers took my attitude, More 4 would lose more eyeballs & hence the advertising revenue would drop below the level that they are able to charge Sky & Virgin for the HD version.
Regarding HD capacity. On main transmitters I am now even getting 2 channels of QVC plus Al Jazeera in HD. Satellite capacity has also increased recently so it would seem that we should now be having Channel 5, ITV 2,3 & 4 in HD on Freesat as well as Freeview.
Many thanks to all who have responded to my post thus far.