Options

"Fine drunks who abuse A&E staff £50, says minister"

NosediveNosedive Posts: 6,602
Forum Member
"Drunks who abuse staff in A&E departments should be fined £50, health minister Norman Lamb has said.

Those who ‘gratuitously’ consume too much alcohol, especially at the weekends, are putting a ‘huge’ burden on hospitals according to the senior Liberal Democrat.

He wants on-the-spot fines for them, starting with those who are ‘abusive’ to medical staff, and can make A&E feel like a ‘war zone’."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2733354/Fine-drunks-abuse-A-E-staff-50-says-minister-He-wants-spot-penalties-end-hospital-war-zones.html

Sounds like a very good idea to me.
Anybody arguing that the fines will simply just go unpaid and that they can't be policed, stuff and nonsense. Look how they've enforced parking fines or speeding tickets even. Like mugs we still all pay up and just go on resenting them.
Bring it on I say.

Comments

  • Options
    deptfordbakerdeptfordbaker Posts: 22,368
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I prefer drunk tanks personally, so they don't even go to A + E. They could sleep it off with police and medical staff watching over them. When they sober up they should pay for their treatment. They could also tax the supermarkets and bars to fund it.
  • Options
    CryolemonCryolemon Posts: 8,670
    Forum Member
    Free at the point of use.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 4,044
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Cryolemon wrote: »
    Free at the point of use.

    Treat them for free but levy an on the spot fine for being D&D
  • Options
    Jol44Jol44 Posts: 21,048
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Why just drunks?

    So it's okay for sober people to abuse them?:confused:
  • Options
    AndyCopenAndyCopen Posts: 2,213
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Cryolemon wrote: »
    Free at the point of use.

    We cant afford to keep funding this socialist shibboleth.
  • Options
    NosediveNosedive Posts: 6,602
    Forum Member
    Cryolemon wrote: »
    Free at the point of use.

    Treatment's free but not the cost of abusing staff. Fine them.
  • Options
    deptfordbakerdeptfordbaker Posts: 22,368
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Cryolemon wrote: »
    Free at the point of use.

    That's not strictly true, the NHS does not pay for all treatments, i.e. removing tattoos. They are a choice in the same way drinking to much is.

    If people are so drunk they need A + E, how come they are so much trouble? I guess they may have injured themselves too.
  • Options
    Jol44Jol44 Posts: 21,048
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    How about people who say abusive things to the police or public sector workers?
  • Options
    jenziejenzie Posts: 20,821
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    ANYONE who abuses or threatens hospital staff should be REFUSED treatment

    and anyway, none of the parties will actually do this, otherwise they'll just hive it off to private companies like every other outside service
  • Options
    OLD HIPPY GUYOLD HIPPY GUY Posts: 28,199
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    50 quid fine isn't much of a deterrent, anyway it should be for ANYONE who abuses hospital staff and not only drunks even though drunks are the main culprits, plenty of sober people are abusive towards NHS staff,
    these people are actually trying to help, how anyone can abuse them is just beyond my understanding, it should actually be a criminal offence to threaten or be abusive towards hospital staff,.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 4,074
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    That's not strictly true, the NHS does not pay for all treatments, i.e. removing tattoos. They are a choice in the same way drinking to much is.
    The NHS may pay for removing tattoos if the tattoos are causing the person significant distress.
    http://www.nhs.uk/chq/Pages/2567.aspx?CategoryID=68&SubCategoryID=154
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 9
    Forum Member
    AndyCopen wrote: »
    We cant afford to keep funding this socialist shibboleth.


    Perhaps if we stopped having successive governments ripping the heart out of the NHS there would be enough funding for this AND providing ample education to people from an early age of the effects of alcohol and its dangers.
  • Options
    AneechikAneechik Posts: 20,208
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Can't really see an issue with the idea but it should apply to everyone, and to be honest I'd be surprised if that sort of behaviour isn't already a crime that could be dealt with using existing laws.
  • Options
    CryolemonCryolemon Posts: 8,670
    Forum Member
    AndyCopen wrote: »
    We cant afford to keep funding this socialist shibboleth.

    It's of paramount importance that we do though.
    Nosedive wrote: »
    Treatment's free but not the cost of abusing staff. Fine them.

    As long as it's done after the fact and through the courts, then fine.

    And no-one should ever be refused treatment except in the most extreme of circumstances.
  • Options
    dorydaryldorydaryl Posts: 15,927
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    50 quid fine isn't much of a deterrent, anyway it should be for ANYONE who abuses hospital staff and not only drunks even though drunks are the main culprits, plenty of sober people are abusive towards NHS staff,
    these people are actually trying to help, how anyone can abuse them is just beyond my understanding, it should actually be a criminal offence to threaten or be abusive towards hospital staff,.

    This ^.
    I really feel that there aren't enough penalties for those who abuse or are violent towards emergency workers, such as medical staff and people working in the fire service. However, I'm not sure how enforceable any penalties would be. Perhaps a sustained campaign to reinforce how socially unacceptable it is might have some effect- 'prevention being better than cure' and all that. At the moment, you see the odd poster up in A & E or the GP surgery but if someone is all fired up, they're not going to take notice in the heat of the moment. However, a longer term campaign through different forms of media might embed something in their consciousness.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 32,379
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I prefer drunk tanks personally, so they don't even go to A + E. They could sleep it off with police and medical staff watching over them. When they sober up they should pay for their treatment. They could also tax the supermarkets and bars to fund it.

    They do that in NZ and Australia, great idea. Won't do that here. Some places have a drunk bus though.

    Drunks shouldn't be taken to A&E but it's a duty of care, crazy though it is.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 32,379
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    50 quid fine isn't much of a deterrent, anyway it should be for ANYONE who abuses hospital staff and not only drunks even though drunks are the main culprits, plenty of sober people are abusive towards NHS staff,
    these people are actually trying to help, how anyone can abuse them is just beyond my understanding, it should actually be a criminal offence to threaten or be abusive towards hospital staff,.

    It probably is but proving a drunk is responsible for his/her actions would be difficult.
  • Options
    NosediveNosedive Posts: 6,602
    Forum Member
    woodbush wrote: »
    It probably is but proving a drunk is responsible for his/her actions would be difficult.

    All the more reason for the use of video cameras, both for hospital premises/security cameras, and the police with body cameras.
  • Options
    FrankieFixerFrankieFixer Posts: 11,530
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Seems like a dumb idea.
  • Options
    David TeeDavid Tee Posts: 22,833
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    As the weekend is here and the subject is being drunk - Clement Freud tells a joke....
Sign In or Register to comment.