Options

New Titles Offically leak

13

Comments

  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 557
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    CD93 wrote: »
    Good to know that such deep modesty gets you nowhere.

    The official titles fit so much better ^_^

    That is a new low for him... :o
  • Options
    TheSilentFezTheSilentFez Posts: 11,103
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    CD93 wrote: »
    Good to know that such deep modesty gets you nowhere.

    The official titles fit so much better ^_^

    That might have been a decent title sequence if it didn't have 30 seconds of inane egotistical crap at the start.
    As someone else has said: a new low.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 1,152
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    CD93 wrote: »
    Good to know that such deep modesty gets you nowhere.

    The official titles fit so much better ^_^

    I'm so, so glad another (modest) Youtuber got the credit :)
  • Options
    PobattiPobatti Posts: 341
    Forum Member
    That might have been a decent title sequence if it didn't have 30 seconds of inane egotistical crap at the start.
    As someone else has said: a new low.

    For a movie the main bulk of this would work incredibly well. The question is, would this sequence with it's overly long running-time and cinematic feel, actually sit well at the front of a weekly television show?

    I think it would work as a one-shot (like the McGann movie's intro), but only in that context.
  • Options
    JAS84JAS84 Posts: 7,430
    Forum Member
    That might have been a decent title sequence if it didn't have 30 seconds of inane egotistical crap at the start.
    As someone else has said: a new low.
    Lazy. Looks like he used parts of the 2005 and 2010 title sequences in that one.
  • Options
    PobattiPobatti Posts: 341
    Forum Member
    JAS84 wrote: »
    Lazy. Looks like he used parts of the 2005 and 2010 title sequences in that one.

    I see what his game is :D

    Make three different sequences each based around official sequences that have their own fan-base, merge them all into one, and then receive positive comments from all three sets of fans. He's trying a cheap trick to make his video get more positive comments and votes, and it's as clear as day.
  • Options
    andy1231andy1231 Posts: 5,100
    Forum Member

    This rubbish can't possibly be the new titles, can it ?
  • Options
    Tony TigerTony Tiger Posts: 2,254
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Just the poster's (idea of a) joke.
  • Options
    Tony TigerTony Tiger Posts: 2,254
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    He's totally right about the dark undertones though :D
  • Options
    CD93CD93 Posts: 13,939
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Tell me more.


    Oh, no - please don't. :) Already seen DB.

    More than Xander David-Hugh has seen.
  • Options
    Tony TigerTony Tiger Posts: 2,254
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Well you'll know we're both right then ;)
  • Options
    MulettMulett Posts: 9,057
    Forum Member
    So, am I right in thinking the new titles haven't leaked?
  • Options
    CD93CD93 Posts: 13,939
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Mulett wrote: »
    So, am I right in thinking the new titles haven't leaked?

    They have - yes.
    Tony Tiger wrote: »
    Well you'll know we're both right then ;)

    I'm starting a Tony Tiger / Ray Smith / Xander David-Hugh Appreciation Thread. Your uneering foresight is a gift to us all.
  • Options
    Michael_EveMichael_Eve Posts: 14,460
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Tony Tiger wrote: »
    Just the poster's (idea of a) joke.

    Phew, thanks for the clarification. Or;

    No expletive deleted, Sherlock!

    I must confess I have sort of seen them (not very clear footage) and me like. Looking forward to seeing them properly a week Saturday. Oh yes. A week Saturday....:)
  • Options
    Tony TigerTony Tiger Posts: 2,254
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Well I thought it seemed obvious too, but the poster did ask.
  • Options
    MulettMulett Posts: 9,057
    Forum Member
    They did. I saw it yesterday on YouTube, albeit with the wrong music. The video has since been blocked.

    Oh well. I'm quite happy to wait!
  • Options
    TheSilentFezTheSilentFez Posts: 11,103
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Mulett wrote: »
    Oh well. I'm quite happy to wait!

    Yeh, it was very blurry. I'm going to wait until 23rd to watch it properly with its full soundtrack. I don't think toastercam did it justice.
  • Options
    Pull2OpenPull2Open Posts: 15,138
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Just heard the new theme. Don't like it!
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 72
    Forum Member
    His titles work better as Star Trek ones...
  • Options
    AbominationAbomination Posts: 6,483
    Forum Member
    Pull2Open wrote: »
    Just heard the new theme. Don't like it!

    It's hard to tell the exact sound of it from the video that leaked, though it's the first thing about Series 8 I've not been sold on (I'll reserve judgement until seeing it properly of course). It just sounds a little too "cheesy 70's sci-fi" I think. Whilst there's a lot to thank Classic Who for, and elements of it that can be appreciated and carried over as well, some elements should remain in the past. I kind of thought the same about putting the Doctor's face in the opening credits - I prefer them to kind of be, I don't know, timeless?

    Then again it's a big deal to make for about 30 seconds of actual screentime, and I don't think it's that important :D
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 178
    Forum Member
    Saw the new titles at the premiere and loved them.
    It's great to see them experiment with the visuals a little, and I approve of the theme being more eery and less bombastic. Like the new Doctor and the show itself, they seem to evoke Classic Who but with a new creative flourish.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 72
    Forum Member
    Aw, NeonVisual blocked me because I said that he must be jealous after he posted this
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 557
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Well, it's a lesson that's been a long time a-coming for Xander. Self-promotion is imperative but you cannot take to it to the extreme where it becomes very counterproductive.

    Hubris. We've all been there.
  • Options
    QuantumLeapQuantumLeap Posts: 706
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Aw, NeonVisual blocked me because I said that he must be jealous after he posted this

    That was you? lol

    I have been on his Facebook page today. First time too. He really is spitting the dummy out. Makes me wonder would that have put the BBC off him....?
  • Options
    DODS11DODS11 Posts: 2,026
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    NV's work is derivative. Looks quite pretty on the 720p feature of YouTube but not really broadcasting standard.

    Billy's work was taken on not because of the 'graphics' or the 'render', it was the concept. Innovative, interesting and different.

    NV's work is stuff that's been done. Space, vortex's, spinny phone boxes. As I said, looks pretty but there's not really an original concept.

    Plus being completely unprofessional about it all isn't exactly helping.
Sign In or Register to comment.