Options

2,380 people died within two weeks of being found fit for work by the government

1235713

Comments

  • Options
    RosebuddyRosebuddy Posts: 1,567
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Originally Posted by gregrichards
    There should be massive protests in the streets and the UN should be getting involved I hate this country because of what is being done to the sick, disabled and vulnerable. It makes North Korea look like a civilised country. We are only one step away from concentration camps.

    Well done fantastic job Ian Duncan Smith you have most likely 2,000 people's blood on your hands and will probably get a knighthood for it.
    Post Of The Week

    A headbutt of a diatribe, full of vein bulging exaggeration and hatred , it would be funny but I think he means every word.
  • Options
    tim59tim59 Posts: 47,188
    Forum Member
    Exactly, the headline is quite dramatic but in reality, there is no story here, but we can agree that IDS is a bell end!

    Depends how you look at it, a doctor gives a person a medical and says not fit for work. The person is given a non medical assessment by the DWP saying fit for work
  • Options
    ElectraElectra Posts: 55,660
    Forum Member
    Exactly, the headline is quite dramatic but in reality, there is no story here, but we can agree that IDS is a bell end!

    Really? Even Tory cheerleaders The Daily Mail are running it
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3213051/Almost-2-400-people-declared-fit-work-taken-benefits-controversial-government-crackdown-dead-TWO-WEEKS.html
  • Options
    cobaye22cobaye22 Posts: 1,376
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Electra wrote: »
    I'm repeating myself here but......So why did the DWP try so hard to suppress them?

    40,680 people died within a year of a Work Capability Assessment between May 2010 and Feb 2013 (Out of 2,017,070).
    All of them will die eventually.

    DWP probably realised the shitstorm the FOI request would cause.
    The Information Commissioner disagreed.
  • Options
    Thine WonkThine Wonk Posts: 17,190
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Not working and being very static at home and not exercising the mind is one of the things that is more likely to lead to decline in mental and physical health. What isn't in the figures is how many people have actually had their lives extended by enabling them to play a part in society and do some level of basic work.

    Claimants can appeal and can be kept on benefit during appeal, even if they lose that benefit they then become eligible for job seekers etc

    500,000 people a year die in England and Wales every year, we don't have any context around expected rates or even what the cause of death was, we also don't have any other historical figures from previous governments to compare against.

    So before you become "outraged of Dorset" by the headlines, THINK.
  • Options
    andersonsonsonandersonsonson Posts: 6,454
    Forum Member
    Electra wrote: »

    Do you really think 2400 people just died after having their benefits removed? Seriously? this is a non story!

    They may have died but just a normal death, as someone else said, it was 2400 out of 2 million.
  • Options
    swaydogswaydog Posts: 5,653
    Forum Member
    cobaye22 wrote: »
    Which will not occur. The FOI information pdf states there were 50,580 deaths within two weeks of 'ESA off-flow' between Dec 2011 and Feb 2014, of which 2,380 had a 'fit for work' decision. But there is no total figure for 'ESA off-flow' given for the period so the whole thing seems a pretty poor presentation of basic mortality statistics.

    It also needs to be compared to the national average premature death rates.
    For eg there were 480,000 premature deaths in England between 2011-2013
    I'd imagine the majority of these were people who were not involved with the ESA etc.
  • Options
    ElectraElectra Posts: 55,660
    Forum Member
    Do you really think 2400 people just died after having their benefits removed? Seriously? this is a non story!

    They may have died but just a normal death, as someone else said, it was 2400 out of 2 million.

    Another one who doesn't get it.

    Their deaths show that they were incorrectly assessed.
  • Options
    tim59tim59 Posts: 47,188
    Forum Member
    cobaye22 wrote: »
    40,680 people died within a year of a Work Capability Assessment between May 2010 and Feb 2013 (Out of 2,017,070).
    All of them will die eventually.

    DWP probably realised the shitstorm the FOI request would cause.
    The Information Commissioner disagreed.

    Well when you have people dying only 2 weeks after the DWP say they are fit for work, and other after only 6 weeks of the DWP saying these people are fit for work then you are going to get the shit flying. it emerged that 2,380 people died within 14 days of being taken off Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) because they were declared ‘fit to work’ after a controversial assessment process.

    A further 270 died within six weeks of being taken off Incapacity Benefit or Severe Disablement Allowance – older benefits which are now being phased out – taking the total to 2,650 between December 2011 and February 2014.
    And saying these people were declared fit for work without being given a medical examination
  • Options
    Thine WonkThine Wonk Posts: 17,190
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Electra wrote: »
    Another one who doesn't get it.

    Their deaths show that they were incorrectly assessed.

    I think you're the one that doesn't get it. You clearly haven't read the report as it says they don't know or have any data about the cause of death and therefore there are no figures at all to link the benefit change to the death. People are always dying, all the time, 500,000 a year.

    Maybe the phrase fit is confusing you, it doesn't mean fit and healthy, it means capable of doing some level of work, it doesn't have to be physical and the numbers are so very small compared to the overall yearly death rates of the population.
  • Options
    Jol44Jol44 Posts: 21,048
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Thine Wonk wrote: »
    Not working and being very static at home and not exercising the mind is one of the things that is more likely to lead to decline in mental and physical health. What isn't in the figures is how many people have actually had their lives extended by enabling them to play a part in society and do some level of basic work.

    Claimants can appeal and can be kept on benefit during appeal, even if they lose that benefit they then become eligible for job seekers etc

    500,000 people a year die in England and Wales every year, we don't have any context around expected rates or even what the cause of death was, we also don't have any other historical figures from previous governments to compare against.

    So before you become "outraged of Dorset" by the headlines, THINK.

    The government declared 2,380 people fit for work, the doctor said they were not fit for work, these people then pretty much immediately dropped own dead.
  • Options
    tim59tim59 Posts: 47,188
    Forum Member
    Do you really think 2400 people just died after having their benefits removed? Seriously? this is a non story!

    They may have died but just a normal death, as someone else said, it was 2400 out of 2 million.

    But they were declared fit for work by the DWP, without having a medical from the DWP. They were given a non medical assessment by the DWP. Well when you have people dying only 2 weeks after the DWP say they are fit for work, and other after only 6 weeks of the DWP saying these people are fit for work then you are going to get the shit flying. it emerged that 2,380 people died within 14 days of being taken off Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) because they were declared ‘fit to work’ after a controversial assessment process.

    A further 270 died within six weeks of being taken off Incapacity Benefit or Severe Disablement Allowance – older benefits which are now being phased out – taking the total to 2,650 between December 2011 and February 2014.
    And saying these people were declared fit for work without being given a medical examination
  • Options
    Thine WonkThine Wonk Posts: 17,190
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Jol44 wrote: »
    The government declared these people fit for work having seen them just a week or so earlier, the doctor said they weren't fit for work. These people dropped down dead.

    Fit to work doesn't mean physically fit, it means capable of doing some level of work that they are suitable for.

    20,000 people a week die in England and Wales, so we're talking about a very small number at 2,300 over the whole 5 year period who died within 2 weeks.
  • Options
    Jol44Jol44 Posts: 21,048
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Thine Wonk wrote: »
    I think you're the one that doesn't get it. You clearly haven't read the report as it says they don't know or have any data about the cause of death and therefore there are no figures at all to link the benefit change to the death. People are always dying, all the time, 500,000 a year.

    Maybe the phrase fit is confusing you, it doesn't mean fit and healthy, it means capable of doing some level of work, it doesn't have to be physical and the numbers are so very small compared to the overall yearly death rates of the population.

    If a relative you know was declared fullu fit by the doctor only to drop down dead the next day due to illness, wouldn't you be asking any questions?
  • Options
    Jol44Jol44 Posts: 21,048
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Thine Wonk wrote: »
    Fit to work doesn't mean physically fit, it means capable of doing some level of work that they are suitable for.

    20,000 people a week die in England and Waless

    Within two weeks of being declared fit by a doctor?
    Thine Wonk wrote: »
    Fit to work doesn't mean physically fit, it means capable of doing some level of work that they are suitable for.

    Nah, not under this government. It means any illness will just be brushed aside.
  • Options
    Thine WonkThine Wonk Posts: 17,190
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Jol44 wrote: »
    If a relative you know was declared fullu fit by the doctor only to drop down dead the next day due to illness, wouldn't you be asking any questions?

    2.5 Million people died over the general population during that period. This figure is really only shocking to people who don't understand mathematics and probability.

    They were not saying people were physically fit and healthy, they were simply saying that they were fit (as in suitable) to perform some level of work and to engage with the help available to look at some work that might be suitable, and they a) could appeal and still get that benefit during appeal and b) still be entitled to job seekers / unemployment benefit.
  • Options
    Jol44Jol44 Posts: 21,048
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Thine Wonk wrote: »
    2.5 Million people died over the general population during that period.
    .

    Within two weeks of being declared fully fit by a doctor?
  • Options
    Jol44Jol44 Posts: 21,048
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    The fact that so many appeals are won proves in itself these test are wrong on so many occasions.

    Many ill people won't even appeal.
  • Options
    andersonsonsonandersonsonson Posts: 6,454
    Forum Member
    Thine Wonk wrote: »
    This figure is really only shocking to people who don't understand mathematics and probability.

    The lack of general numbers skills is quite frightening
  • Options
    CravenHavenCravenHaven Posts: 13,953
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Unless we know what the causes of each death was, these figures are just being used to lead an agenda.
    It's not like accusing people less fortunate than themselves of being workshy is an agenda. Shame on anybody else's statistics.
    ^_^
  • Options
    RichmondBlueRichmondBlue Posts: 21,279
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Well, if they're dead they will never trouble the system by claiming benefits again, will they ?

    The "final solution" redesigned by IDS..aka Dr Death and his team from Atos.
  • Options
    Thine WonkThine Wonk Posts: 17,190
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Jol44 wrote: »
    Within two weeks of being declared fully fit by a doctor?

    They never claim to be declared "fully fit", those are your words and that isn't how it works.
    The WCA uses 17 activities with associated “descriptors”
    which award points to claimants based on their ability to
    perform certain tasks related to the workplace. Any claimant
    scoring fewer than 15 points is considered capable of work.
    For example, descriptor 4 covers ‘picking up and moving by
    using the upper limbs’. Being unable to pick up and carry a
    0.5 litre container scores 15 points.
    If the person can do this
    but ‘cannot transfer a light but bulky object such as a
    cardboard box’ they score 9 points.
    The claimant’s final
    score is the total from each of these activities

    Support Group: The claimant has limited capability for workrelated
    activity. Benefit here is paid at a higher level and claimants
    are not expected to be available for work. They can, however,
    volunteer themselves for work-focussed training and support.
     Work Related Activity Group (WRAG): Claimants with limited
    capability for work are expected to ‘take part in some work-related
    activity’ and receive support to achieve this goal.
  • Options
    CravenHavenCravenHaven Posts: 13,953
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Jol44 wrote: »
    Many ill people won't even appeal.
    Indeed. The dead aren't appealing.
    Necrophilia excepted.
  • Options
    Thine WonkThine Wonk Posts: 17,190
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    500,000 people a year die, so in the 5 year period where the 2,300 died after passing the "fit for work" (NOT a complete all clear on health) 2.5 Million people died, or 1086 people for every 1 person counted in the 2,300 figure.
  • Options
    CravenHavenCravenHaven Posts: 13,953
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    you must be havin' a giraffe.
    It's hard to beat Team Cripple & Death's Door Allstars for death rate. The relevant statistics are "general working population" v. the rejected claimants.
    Skyclad wrote: »
    I understand all your words but still have no idea what you are saying :confused:
    I fully support the encouragement of the mentally disabled to take greater part in the community and seek fulfilling work.
    - Ian "Deadly" Sniper
Sign In or Register to comment.