[flower 2]

I think C5 should let us vote for who we want to nominate for eviction...The 2 with the highest amount of viewers votes are up.

Then we vote for who we want out from those 2.

Would stop all the nomination backbiting in the house, and maybe then they would just get on with getting on with each other or not getting on with each other.

[027huds]

I like nominations though. A fundamental part of the show. If anything they should actually be punishing noms talk properly by banning the culprits like they used to.

Also, they should make it so that a minimum of three housemates are up each week so one side of the house doesn't have the power to dictate who faces eviction by doing shady noms talk in the first place.

[Teddybear99]

Originally Posted by 027huds

I like nominations though. A fundamental part of the show. If anything they should actually be punishing noms talk properly by banning the culprits like they used to.

Also, they should make it so that a minimum of three housemates are up each week so one side of the house doesn't have the power to dictate who faces eviction by doing shady noms talk in the first place.

I agree, I would love to see proper private nominations every week with no face to face or friends and family or anything else. I loved the year when they had the nominations uncut programme.

Yep no nomination talk either.

[RenThraysk]

Glass House method is pretty decent.

The public votes each week, and the two with the least amount of votes become team captains.
The team captains then pick their teams from the rest of the house mates for the weekly challenge.
The losing team captain, and another member of the losing team voted for by the house are put up for eviction.
They both leave the house and go into limbo. Viewers vote, and at the end of the week only one gets to return back to the house.

Removing both players that are up for eviction from the house, (ie they get no air time) means the process is seen to be utterly fair. No one can gain an advantage, and it cannot be argued there is any production bias. Also means that a house mate up for eviction can't have a bad week (like Arron and Shievonne for instance) and get themselves evicted.

It ensures that at least one person (losing team captain) up for eviction is disliked by the public, so they don't linger about in the house like they can do in BB UK.

[flower 2]

I just think the housemates have to much power over who stays and who goes, I think that power should be taken away from them and given over to us the viewers....after all, after BB we are in charge.

I think the shock and fear on their faces would be equally if not more exciting.

We would still have their diary room time to find out who they would like to see out of the house.

[Verence]

1) Normal noms
2) No twists
3) No immunity (even for newbies in their first week)
4) Vote to save
5) Minimum of three HMs up for eviction

[ryanr554]

Originally Posted by Verence

1) Normal noms
2) No twists
3) No immunity (even for newbies in their first week)
4) Vote to save
5) Minimum of three HMs up for eviction

I wouldn't say no to a few twists here and there but I agree with this.