Linda Lusardi. Former Page three model: No professional training at Drama School yet listed in Spotlight because she worked professionaly in things like panto and other work. http://www.spotlight.com/interactive/cv/1/f9119.html
Ex- Hollyoaks star Elize du Toit. Only acting work prior to Hollyoaks in in university drama club productions and a few local productions in Edinburgh. No Drama school training but had been is listed in The Spotlight Directory while still in Hollyoaks http://www.spotlight.com/interactive/cv/1/a4082/f74675.html
Roxanne McKee has been listed in Spotlight. No drama school training at all with a degree in Politics from Royal Holloway University, yet because she has appeared in Hollyoaks she qualified to be listed.
This proves you do not need any accredited training to get listed in Spotlight, only to have worked professionally.
You don't need to fullfill both requirements to get listed in Spotlight it's a simple as that.
Erm..that doesn't prove any point at all, except you haven't read the previous posts. No one disputes it is EITHER / OR.
The three examples you have given all fulfil ONE OF THE REQUIRED CRITERIA. Only 1 of 2 is required. Emily has said that. REPEATEDLY.
Clearly all the three listed above would qualify for Spotlight as THEY HAVE ALL WORKED PROFESSIONALLY - Elize and Roxanne had long stints in a soap, and Linda has done various pantos etc and ?been in one of the soaps.
Comments
Erm..that doesn't prove any point at all, except you haven't read the previous posts. No one disputes it is EITHER / OR.
The three examples you have given all fulfil ONE OF THE REQUIRED CRITERIA. Only 1 of 2 is required. Emily has said that. REPEATEDLY.
Clearly all the three listed above would qualify for Spotlight as THEY HAVE ALL WORKED PROFESSIONALLY - Elize and Roxanne had long stints in a soap, and Linda has done various pantos etc and ?been in one of the soaps.
What is your point?