i don't think he deserved to be shot dead the way he was no matter what. The police should shoot to wound not kill They managed to avoid killing Lee Rigby's murderers so clearly its able to be done
Nevertheless the guy was clearly dodgy so no monument for him:D
i don't think he deserved to be shot dead the way he was no matter what. The police should shoot to wound not kill They managed to avoid killing Lee Rigby's murderers so clearly its able to be done
Nevertheless the guy was clearly dodgy so no monument for him:D
I'm sure if you believed that somebody, who you know had been in possession of a loaded gun, was pointing said gun at you, you'd do whatever you felt necessary to protect yourself.
We have too many monuments. A new monument should be for a person who had made a direct or indirect contribution that a community or the society still benefits from. People like William Cuffay or John Snow, yes, but the rest? No.
Zimmie
Posts: 1,244
Comments
Yes...
A monument to a gun-carrying gang-banger?
smh
Definitely
No.
No.
with his two by four
"ohhh ohhh"
and holding a 2 by 4 - definitely :kitty:
Is this a troll, or are you just a bit soft in the head?
State murder is unlawful and wrong.
So it might be, but what's that got to do with the Mark Duggan case?
Why not build one for Raoul Moat as well?
No thanks, although I do admire the obvious troll intention of the thread.
Who's that trip-trapping over my bridge?
You?
You just said it so no monument needed.
i don't think he deserved to be shot dead the way he was no matter what. The police should shoot to wound not kill They managed to avoid killing Lee Rigby's murderers so clearly its able to be done
Nevertheless the guy was clearly dodgy so no monument for him:D
Vastly preferable.
It is indeed.
I'm sure if you believed that somebody, who you know had been in possession of a loaded gun, was pointing said gun at you, you'd do whatever you felt necessary to protect yourself.
Who else are you going to propose? The Krays? Dr Crippen?