Home› Archived Forums› Showbiz

Kym Marsh's sex tape...

«1345

Comments

  • Ann_TennaAnn_Tenna Posts: 395
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #2
    Thirty-thousand pounds for Kym Marsh's tape?!

    In the comments section, there's a guy offering a tape of himself with the missus who will consider any offers over five pounds. I'm going to try to buy his video! :D
  • Ronald_DixonRonald_Dixon Posts: 244
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #3
    Sex tape?
    It's only Hearsay.
  • CFCJM1CFCJM1 Posts: 2,065
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #4
    The first thought that entered my head was "with who". Sad reflection on her extensive and overly publicised love life.
  • WhedoniteWhedonite Posts: 29,239
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #5
    CFCJM1 wrote: »
    The first thought that entered my head was "with who". Sad reflection on her extensive and overly publicised love life.

    What's so extensive about it? A single woman dating around is hardly unusual.
  • CryolemonCryolemon Posts: 8,670
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #6
    There's plenty I'd rather see.
  • Gusto BruntGusto Brunt Posts: 12,351
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    #7
    She's not got passed the Jeremy Kyle guest stage yet. Not interested.
  • zx50zx50 Posts: 91,269
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #8
    Goaty wrote: »
    I wonder who want see that! But great comments on the link; :D

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3648941/Kym-Marsh-left-reeling-explicit-sex-tape-video-partner-offered-sale-30-000.html

    I'm wondering how exactly her sex tape recording got in the hands of someone that was willing to sell it? Did she not make sure it was safe and secure? Unless it was the fella in the video who has betrayed her by offering it for tens of thousands maybe. I dunno.
  • CFCJM1CFCJM1 Posts: 2,065
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #9
    Whedonite wrote: »
    What's so extensive about it? A single woman dating around is hardly unusual.

    She had affairs during both of her marriages - mercifully that is quite unusual.

    It is an invasion of her privacy to have this made public and - to a degree - I actually feel sorry for her. However having seen her on lots of magazine covers over the years - always madly in love with her latest man - she has now left herself quite open to scrutiny.
  • amelia99amelia99 Posts: 5,641
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #10
    How may zelebrity sex tapes have now made it mysteriously into the public domain? You'd think they'd have copped on by now that filming their sexploits might not be the best idea. That is unless they're of the view that all publicity is good publicity.
  • stvn758stvn758 Posts: 19,656
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    #11
    Isn't it an imprisonable offence to release nude photos and video without permission?

    Is she hard up for cash, thought she was a regular on Corrie, why can't it be Mylene. :(
  • ewoodieewoodie Posts: 26,756
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #12
    So who is the DM's source? Who knows she is feeling vulnerable etc or what is on this tape. Who would contact the press and tell them? Does this tape really exist?
  • Bob PaisleyBob Paisley Posts: 3,627
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #13
    stvn758 wrote: »
    Isn't it an imprisonable offence to release nude photos and video without permission?

    I don't think so. Whoever filmed the video theoretically owns the copyright - although I'm not an expert when it comes to the legal comings and goings of a celebrity sex tape.
  • CravenHavenCravenHaven Posts: 13,953
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    #14
    stvn758 wrote: »
    Isn't it an imprisonable offence to release nude photos and video without permission?

    Is she hard up for cash, thought she was a regular on Corrie, why can't it be Mylene. :(
    I feel your pain. :( Hang on in there
  • Chris1964Chris1964 Posts: 19,799
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    #15
    amelia99 wrote: »
    How may zelebrity sex tapes have now made it mysteriously into the public domain? You'd think they'd have copped on by now that filming their sexploits might not be the best idea. That is unless they're of the view that all publicity is good publicity.

    Well technology is such these days that if something is recorded, the whole world might as well know. If she has consented to the video then I don't have much sympathy, considering the world she lives in its particularly naïve imo.
  • WhedoniteWhedonite Posts: 29,239
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #16
    CFCJM1 wrote: »
    She had affairs during both of her marriages - mercifully that is quite unusual.

    It is an invasion of her privacy to have this made public and - to a degree - I actually feel sorry for her. However having seen her on lots of magazine covers over the years - always madly in love with her latest man - she has now left herself quite open to scrutiny.

    Did she? I know rumours surfaced about her sleeping with her co-star during her marriage to Jamie Lomas, but I didn't know after the other rumours. Were they confirmed? Still doesn't make it extensive though. She's linked to every man she's seen with, regardless of whether she's dating him or not.
  • Brummie Girl Brummie Girl Posts: 22,686
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #17
    Bob Paisley wrote: »
    I don't think so. Whoever filmed the video theoretically owns the copyright - although I'm not an expert when it comes to the legal comings and goings of a celebrity sex tape.

    Doesn't it come under the recently added 'revenge porn' (that's not its official name) law? Regardless of whether the person in the video or photo was complicit in the act if A N Other publishes that image without that person's consent then they are committing a crime.
  • Bob PaisleyBob Paisley Posts: 3,627
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #18
    Brummy Girl wrote: »
    Doesn't it come under the recently added 'revenge porn' (that's not its official name) law? Regardless of whether the person in the video or photo was complicit in the act if A N Other publishes that image without that person's consent then they are committing a crime.

    It might. I'd forgotten about that. Like I say, I'm no expert on the matter.
  • GroutyGrouty Posts: 34,031
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #19
    Ronald_Dixon wrote: »
    Sex tape?
    It's only Hearsay.

    *Doffs cap
  • stvn758stvn758 Posts: 19,656
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    #20
    Bob Paisley wrote: »
    I don't think so. Whoever filmed the video theoretically owns the copyright - although I'm not an expert when it comes to the legal comings and goings of a celebrity sex tape.

    Revenge Porn that's against the law now, they even locked someone up recently. :confused:

    Thought the only way another celeb sex tape would make an appearance now is if they approved it and that would be really obvious to all, they can hardly deny it if it were released.
    CravenHaven wrote: »
    I feel your pain. :( Hang on in there

    Have to make do with her bikini photos. :(
  • PunksNotDeadPunksNotDead Posts: 21,276
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #21
    The seller allegedly met reporters and played them a 57-second video on a mobile phone which they were told is 'very explicit'.

    The phrase "Get a life" springs to mind.
  • egghead1egghead1 Posts: 4,782
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #22
    I recall a tape or photos not sure which,came out with Suzanne Shaw on it,when she was iN HearSay. A masturbation one I seem to recall.
  • Jedi_KnightJedi_Knight Posts: 613
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    #23
    Here's hoping that the tape is pure and simple.
  • SambdaSambda Posts: 6,210
    Forum Member
    ✭
    #24
    egghead1 wrote: »
    I recall a tape or photos not sure which,came out with Suzanne Shaw on it,when she was iN HearSay. A masturbation one I seem to recall.

    Yes - it was an audition tape for a soft-porn job, filmed, it seems, in some toilets somewhere! Suzanne Shaw got thru it; I'm sure Kym Marsh will too. Only Myleene left to make one now. Mind you, there's loads of her in her smalls.
  • zx50zx50 Posts: 91,269
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #25
    stvn758 wrote: »
    Isn't it an imprisonable offence to release nude photos and video without permission?

    Is she hard up for cash, thought she was a regular on Corrie, why can't it be Mylene. :(

    From what I've just read, the law on revenge porn makes it illegal to distribute sexual images/video of anyone online without that person's permission. So, the person offering the recording of Kym performing sexual acts, they could end up being charged for breaking some law.
  • Bob PaisleyBob Paisley Posts: 3,627
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    #26
    egghead1 wrote: »
    I recall a tape or photos not sure which,came out with Suzanne Shaw on it,when she was iN HearSay. A masturbation one I seem to recall.

    Was that ever conclusively proven to be her? I seem to recall you never saw her face. I always assumed it was fake. Did she ever admit it was her?
Sign In or Register to comment.