Don't read or listen to what you read. She's probably not got that sort of money. Her accounts would have looked at to what she's entitled too. Remember ladies and gentlemen she uses one name Jordan and another Katie Price one earns more than the other;-)
Do those that criticise her for using it, assuming they're not living off benefits themselves and in full time work, pay for a private waste collection service out of their own pockets rather than waste taxpayers money on the council's?
Do those that criticise her for using it, assuming they're not living off benefits themselves and in full time work, pay for a private waste collection service out of their own pockets rather than waste taxpayers money on the council's?
It's really no different
Don't ruin the bile spitting by bringing facts into play
There were several threads with posts that explained the situation regarding a child with an SEN statement and the legal obligation for the LEA to provide transport but those posts were continually ignored by the 'rich chav taking wads of cash from the government meaning other kids go without' brigade who want to bash KP for the sake of it, despite getting it completely wrong
The OP proves there are none as blind as those who don't want to see
was discussing this with my daughter earlier and we were in agreement on this one, surely she can afford to live anywhere so why not move harvey somewhere nearer to his school? simples
Means test everyone or leave it as it is, fair's fair. People shouldn't be punished for being successful whatever they do or whether they're likeable or not.
was discussing this with my daughter earlier and we were in agreement on this one, surely she can afford to live anywhere so why not move harvey somewhere nearer to his school? simples
Her house was closer to his school, it was closed down. Her other children are all settled in their schools. Why should she have to uproot her whole life? I believe she tried with other parents to open a free school for Harvey and other disabled kids but they were unable to get funding. The council have decided for whatever reason that it's easier/cheaper to drive the disabled kids in the area rather than open a suitable school for them.
I have nothing against ''any'' disabled child getting help when needed as long as they all get treated equally , what i do have a problem with is all this talk of ive paid my taxes so im entitled to this that and the next thing , yet Elderly people who have paid taxes all their life and spent all their lifes trying to save a few pounds to leave for their children are forced to sell their homes and use any savings to go towards their care in care homes
was discussing this with my daughter earlier and we were in agreement on this one, surely she can afford to live anywhere so why not move harvey somewhere nearer to his school? simples
Because she likes where she lives.
London is very busy for five children, including a disabled son who has sensitivities too, why should she flood him with noise and pollution when he is home from school?
He is entitled to this service as he is disabled.
I love what this government has done and made people who were maybe once rational into those who bash and berate the disabled as they are entitled to some things, call them scroungers. They have really done a good job, especially from detracting from the tax avoiders who if they paid everything they owed, nobody would have to see a cut in anything!
Her house was closer to his school, it was closed down. Her other children are all settled in their schools. Why should she have to uproot her whole life? I believe she tried with other parents to open a free school for Harvey and other disabled kids but they were unable to get funding. The council have decided for whatever reason that it's easier/cheaper to drive the disabled kids in the area rather than open a suitable school for them.
sorry have to disagree on this one, why funding/ a free school? maybe a few less boob jobs would pay for one, she can afford it, im sure her other kids would settle in well anywhere, theyre happy sociable kids, many parents have to move to do whats right for their kids, why should she be any different? and if she doesnt want to move im quite sure she could afford to employ a driver and a nurse, i dont dislike katie price but i feel this one is a no brainer
Comments
And he is entitled to whatever he gets.
You sound as bitter as Hopkins
Ease up ... it's a severely disabled child you're talking about !
Hopkins is fake money
That in itself is poetic. But KH's tax money will carry on contributing to Harvey's lift to school.......YAY!!!
KH and tax?
I wish I was retiring from being an accountant :cool:
Lol........She's such a straight taxpayer. It proves her point, and i would imagine, wets her downstairs region!!!
She lives for tearing into a fat ginger bird, with a kid, on benefits....
I'd LOVE her to document her views on things that actually matter in this world. Like ISIS, Ukraine, Boko Haram etc!!!!
She's a joke, if she had tits, she'd be posing for Zoo mag tomorrow!
spat my tea out. But spot on!
....................
Let's hope she will stop claiming the benefit now she had her pay check
Do those that criticise her for using it, assuming they're not living off benefits themselves and in full time work, pay for a private waste collection service out of their own pockets rather than waste taxpayers money on the council's?
It's really no different
Even the queen pays tax and she could get a horse drawn carriage to ferry her if she wanted.....
Oh she does....
Price sends 2 of her kids to PRIVATE SCHOOL too.
Oh please no!!!! The word horrific springs to mind.
Don't ruin the bile spitting by bringing facts into play
There were several threads with posts that explained the situation regarding a child with an SEN statement and the legal obligation for the LEA to provide transport but those posts were continually ignored by the 'rich chav taking wads of cash from the government meaning other kids go without' brigade who want to bash KP for the sake of it, despite getting it completely wrong
The OP proves there are none as blind as those who don't want to see
You lot should be thoroughly ashamed of yourselves
Seems that way, and I don't know why we are so down on the disabled or the poor these days it is quite distressing really.
Her house was closer to his school, it was closed down. Her other children are all settled in their schools. Why should she have to uproot her whole life? I believe she tried with other parents to open a free school for Harvey and other disabled kids but they were unable to get funding. The council have decided for whatever reason that it's easier/cheaper to drive the disabled kids in the area rather than open a suitable school for them.
KH does not live in KPs area so she wont be contributing anything, this is a local issue , paid for by local Council.
Because she likes where she lives.
London is very busy for five children, including a disabled son who has sensitivities too, why should she flood him with noise and pollution when he is home from school?
He is entitled to this service as he is disabled.
I love what this government has done and made people who were maybe once rational into those who bash and berate the disabled as they are entitled to some things, call them scroungers. They have really done a good job, especially from detracting from the tax avoiders who if they paid everything they owed, nobody would have to see a cut in anything!
It shocks me to the core.
sorry have to disagree on this one, why funding/ a free school? maybe a few less boob jobs would pay for one, she can afford it, im sure her other kids would settle in well anywhere, theyre happy sociable kids, many parents have to move to do whats right for their kids, why should she be any different? and if she doesnt want to move im quite sure she could afford to employ a driver and a nurse, i dont dislike katie price but i feel this one is a no brainer