Options

Should the government sell it's London property portfolio

Ethel_FredEthel_Fred Posts: 34,127
Forum Member
✭✭✭
Massively in debt, increasing costs of repair and maintenance, buildings not fit for the 20th, let alone 21st century needs, property values in London at an all time high.

So why not think the unthinkable and sell up and move on - it's what's recommended for other asset rich, cash poor groups.

Comments

  • Options
    MattNMattN Posts: 2,534
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    And Move Where exactly??

    The government has already soled off a lot of central London land.
  • Options
    jcafcwjcafcw Posts: 11,282
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    What we could do is build some more council housing - use that to house the ones in the rundown houses. Then demolish those and build some more council housing.

    The only way to get our housing benefits bill down is to build more council housing and provide cheap housing for the workers as well as the people on benefits.

    Provide some Government competition to over-valued private housing sector.

    Won't happen under a Tory Govt (or a Labour one) - votes in the short term are more important than a long term housing strategy. And that means protecting the over-valued house prices to the detriment of everyone.
  • Options
    worzilworzil Posts: 4,590
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Ethel_Fred wrote: »
    Massively in debt, increasing costs of repair and maintenance, buildings not fit for the 20th, let alone 21st century needs, property values in London at an all time high.

    So why not think the unthinkable and sell up and move on - it's what's recommended for other asset rich, cash poor groups.

    Might as well they have sold everything else.
    Maybe the China could buy it that would then mean it's not only our utilities and commerce that are owned by foreign investors they will then own the land as well.
    The things men fought and died for no longer exists .
  • Options
    angarrackangarrack Posts: 5,493
    Forum Member
    You can only do it once.

    Just the same as Gordon Brown's gold sale.
  • Options
    ecco66ecco66 Posts: 16,117
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Ethel_Fred wrote: »
    Massively in debt, increasing costs of repair and maintenance, buildings not fit for the 20th, let alone 21st century needs, property values in London at an all time high.

    So why not think the unthinkable and sell up and move on - it's what's recommended for other asset rich, cash poor groups.
    To where do you suggest they move?
  • Options
    rjb101rjb101 Posts: 2,689
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    ecco66 wrote: »
    To where do you suggest they move?

    They could move to Sutton Coalfield. London could then become an independent state
  • Options
    LostFoolLostFool Posts: 90,662
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I thought governments had been selling off property and moving backoffice staff outside of London for years?
  • Options
    GormagonGormagon Posts: 1,473
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    rjb101 wrote: »
    They could move to Sutton Coalfield. London could then become an independent state

    The BBC moved lots of their radio peoples to Manchester. That worked well.

    The talent left, and the travel costs quadroupled.
  • Options
    swb1964swb1964 Posts: 4,700
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    If you are truly thinking the unthinkable, I wonder what the total value of Hyde Park would be, if sold on the open market with open planning permission?
Sign In or Register to comment.