In the realms of 'low'. I only vaguely knew she was even preggers again. I'm glad they're both well (are they? I've heard someone say they are), because everyone deserves to have a healthy baby and not die in childbirth. I've yet to read any news about it though, so all my knowledge of the event is through Facebook.
I saw there was a 'News Special' program on TV yesterday and couldn't believe it when I turned over to see what this big news was which warranted a special unscheduled program, and discovered it was just the routine birth of a baby. Totally baffling to me.
It's probably because is a modern, independent woman who has kept her name as she, understandably, doesn't want to be defined by who her husband might happen to be.
I think that she very much wants to be defined by who her husband is !! She did very well for herself & good luck to her.
She was never an independent woman Her parents bankrolled her, before her marriage. The press refer to her by her maiden name - to be nasty, reminding us of her previous, ' Commoner' status. She hasn't elected to keep the name....
I think that she very much wants to be defined by who her husband is !! She did very well for herself & good luck to her.
She was never an independent woman Her parents bankrolled her, before her marriage. The press refer to her by her maiden name - to be nasty, reminding us of her previous, ' Commoner' status. She hasn't elected to keep the name....
But surely she ceased to be common like the rest of us the moment she got married. They would have whisked her off at some point during the celebrations to get a transfusion of that magic royal blood, which, I believe, is administered by unicorns. Maybe the press know something we don't... like maybe the magic royal blood didn't 'take'. OMG, imagine if that happened!!! She'd be just a normal woman giving birth to a normal baby.
I put 'slightly interested' because I'll admit to being curious about whether it was a boy or girl and the name but beyond that I don't care.
I certainly won't be reading the endless articles about it in The Fail and other rags. I think that's more for the US readers anyway, they always seem more keen than those in the UK.
Comments
If that makes me pathetic, I'm glad.
Those people might think that those who have an interest in royal babies, are pathetic.
But then again, they are probably more reasonable than that.
I work at St Marys and had a chat with the union jack people
they weren't normal
http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showthread.php?t=2068845
It prompted me to remind myself how the line of succession stands currently.
http://s2.postimg.org/v08dvqeh5/babyname.jpg
HAHA
I saw there was a 'News Special' program on TV yesterday and couldn't believe it when I turned over to see what this big news was which warranted a special unscheduled program, and discovered it was just the routine birth of a baby. Totally baffling to me.
I think that she very much wants to be defined by who her husband is !! She did very well for herself & good luck to her.
She was never an independent woman
That made me laugh
Each to their own, I guess...... but...................;-)
Why single out the royal baby for a poll?
And the way they dressed George in his knee length socks WTF LOL.
William needs to shave his head aswell
But surely she ceased to be common like the rest of us the moment she got married. They would have whisked her off at some point during the celebrations to get a transfusion of that magic royal blood, which, I believe, is administered by unicorns. Maybe the press know something we don't... like maybe the magic royal blood didn't 'take'. OMG, imagine if that happened!!! She'd be just a normal woman giving birth to a normal baby.
Thousands of babies are born every day.
Why is this one more special?
That's the problem.
You never see Republicans given airtime on the BBC. Can't upset her majesty.
Wake up Britain, smell the coffee and show these freeloading, parasites the door.
I certainly won't be reading the endless articles about it in The Fail and other rags. I think that's more for the US readers anyway, they always seem more keen than those in the UK.