Options
Lauren Silverman chooses Simon over her son
maidinscotland
Posts: 5,648 Forum Member
✭
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2508410/MoS-DIARY-Cowells-girlfriend-Lauren-Silverman-awful-holiday-choice--son-Simon.html
Simon has not to have any contact with her son until at least January 2014 so she has to make a choice who she spends Christmas with, Simon or her son. She chose Simon! I think Simon should insist she spends Christmas with her son, selfish bint! :mad:
Simon has not to have any contact with her son until at least January 2014 so she has to make a choice who she spends Christmas with, Simon or her son. She chose Simon! I think Simon should insist she spends Christmas with her son, selfish bint! :mad:
0
Comments
Mind you, why couldn't HE change his plans for one year? Stay somewhere close to her so that she could spend Christmas and the holiday season with her son but still fit in visits to him? If he cared that much he would.
These two really leave a bad taste in my mouth :mad:
Click on the link & it's all about Harry Potter giving up the **** but all the comments are about Simon & Cruella abandoning her child at christmas.
I just can't warm to this woman at all.
Reading about those figures above, Mr Silverman seems to have done well out of this divorce financially.
BUT isn't the ex being a bit childish in using his child as a bartering tool! Makes my blood boil when exes behave like this yet not one person in this thread has mentioned it.
Agree. Two grubby, sleazy, shallow, vapid people. A good match. Shame there are kids involved.
Yeah, very strange. Even the link has his name in it. It does look like they asked for it to be removed quickly.
Maybe.... betrayal does that to people
I did wonder this myself. However, It says the child is never to refer to Simon as Dad but further down it does mention that Lauren has the exact same clause about women her ex husband dates not being referred to as 'mum' too, so maybe he's not allowed to introduce his girlfriends either? It sounds like it goes both ways to me.
Indeed.
Simon is a horrible person and I'm surprised how many people are still taken in by him.
Agreed.
My husband has an especial loathing for him, and after Ms Bowlegs Price, he's one of my own biggest showbiz bugbears.
Still, after what's come out about the ex Mrs Silverman, I think they're made for one another.
Don't you mean semen lol
well i'm mentioning it
Also , Silverman AND her husband were never slow to dump the kid on a nanny or family members while they went for a jolly on Simons love boat
the clause might have come from a standpoint of bitterness but actually from a child's point of view is actually very sensible, I am more concerned about how children feel and interpret their parents introducing 'simon - mummys friend' soon after their parents split up with all the implied dynamics
I think divorced or separated parents have a responsiblity not to introduce new 'friends' to their children until a substantial period after the split, their child is grieving and needs time to process the loss of their parents relationship
The poor lad will probably be asking where his mum is at a time when families should be together and feeling rejected though, so which is worse?
With parents and a stepdaddy like his goodness knows how he'll turn out.
I dont think I said anywhere that she should choose to be away from her son at Christmas, that is a choice she chose to make to meet her own needs.
I merely said that clauses like this about new partners not being introduced to children after divorce are actually in the child's best interest.
I assume most mothers would choose to act in accordance with this and prioritise the child. That hasnt happened in this case.
It's understandable that the child has been told not to refer to Simon as dad and the girlfriends of their dad as mum. It's not really fair on the biological parents.
Actually the clauses themselves show just how bad their relationship is. Any civilised divorcing people will not need this to be put in writing . All children hate their parents divorcing and this kid will be no exception but clauses in divorce papers is not the answer. The parents need to be united that they both love the child and the child's needs comes first.
But as someone further up mentioned there is going to be a baby who will be a half sibling to this child. So not only are his parents divorcing but all of a sudden there will be a new baby usurping him. Yes that is how this child will see it. Just all wrong no matter how you look at it. Lucky there is plenty of dosh to pay for a future therapist!!
I didn't say you did.
He will have to meet Cowell at sometime, but this just looks like both of the Silvermans are choosing to be downright awkward.
One point. Why does she keep up her married name when there appears to be so much bad blood between them?
Normally I would agree with you but not when there is a new baby on the way.
Agreed, the adults in this case have acted thoughtlessly, so now we have a child who HAS to accept a new family member and the new adult father of that family member before he is ready to. Well done mum.