As most of the acts fall into these categories it is amazing that I still enjoy the show!
Having said that though, many of my favourite acts fall into these categories (Diversity, Signature, Edward Reid, Stavros Flatley, etc). But I think that might be that they provided something different.
Vast majority of singing and dancing acts now bore me. I guarantee that at least 5 of the acts in the final will be singing or dancing acts. I prefer more unique talents. The Regurgitator from a few years ago was awesome!
We need more people like the Dancing Leprechaun or Chopping Wood (Sean Sheehan)
I think bgt basically has the same acts every year except a different few.
Only spellbound, the cycling guy and Damien from series 1 have been unique IMO, seems every year we have an opera singer, a kid singer (overrated), dance troupe or two, a stripper, a pain act etc
I agree with all of this i could name on one hand the only unique acts in all the years of BGT,you have named them also i would add Signature to that list as i have never saw that before it made me smile plus they were great dancers!
I do see it like that, I could watch a whole show on just dog act. Infact I was thinking only last night wouldn't it be great to have a dog only version of the show called Britain's Got Tailent
Me too. I loved Flawless and Diversity and the duo called Twist and Pulse, but large groups from dance schools bore me.
They are good at what they do but they spoil it by bringing on far too many dancers and wearing over the top make-up.
I don't like singers and dancers. If there unique there ok but there is the X-factor so no point having them on BGT. I also dislike poets boring. I agree time wasting acts sholdn't be on.
The half decent but desperate singers that audition for every TV show going. "Oh look, it's such and so from that show..." :rolleyes: Ridiculous getting people who go out at the X Factor boot camp stage turning up on the Voice or BGT and being told they're superstars. No they're not actually...:rolleyes:
I don't like dogs so I'm not going to like dog acts am I?
TBH there's not much I like, I was getting a bit bored throughout this weekend's edition but that guy who wrote the love song - I had a little chuckle - but then he had already been seen in a producer audition so it was all set-up so I was bored again.
Any child act involving an under 12 who gets put through for being cute, despite being crap.
Worst ever was that child dancing duo with 8 inches of slap each and the stage school brat who forgot her words and started crying.
Don't get me wrong, I like kids, but this isn't the place
Oh I'll have to change mine - single dancers are my second least fave as my least fave is child acts.
Though it's mainly because I personally can't stand kids.
People don't really want to see a tiny little kid, who should technically finish school first, go through the pressures of fame at that age. Hence why even when a child act is supposed to win (series 1 and series 5) they don't.
Along with the fact they just don't have that much appeal. I mean what the hell has a kid got to sing about? They haven't even lived yet.
Most child stars don't continue the success into adulthood anyway, they're more likely to end up in rehab instead. If I had the choice, I'd take success/fame when I'm older thanks. :cool:
Street dance troupes. They won't get another one as good as Diversity, who truly broke the mould - none of the ones they've put through have even come close to them - they all do the identical same thing only not as well, so what's the point?
Street dance troupes. They won't get another one as good as Diversity, who truly broke the mould - none of the ones they've put through have even come close to them - they all do the identical same thing only not as well, so what's the point?
You wouldn't like Got to Dance then! Endless sub Diversity street crews.
Comments
Singers
Child acts
As most of the acts fall into these categories it is amazing that I still enjoy the show!
Having said that though, many of my favourite acts fall into these categories (Diversity, Signature, Edward Reid, Stavros Flatley, etc). But I think that might be that they provided something different.
We need more people like the Dancing Leprechaun or Chopping Wood (Sean Sheehan)
I agree with all of this i could name on one hand the only unique acts in all the years of BGT,you have named them also i would add Signature to that list as i have never saw that before it made me smile plus they were great dancers!
I do see it like that, I could watch a whole show on just dog act. Infact I was thinking only last night wouldn't it be great to have a dog only version of the show called Britain's Got Tailent
Chopping wood, chopping wood
I'm sure on one performance of that he almost sang "Robin Hood, Robin Hood" and had to correct himself
They are good at what they do but they spoil it by bringing on far too many dancers and wearing over the top make-up.
TBH there's not much I like, I was getting a bit bored throughout this weekend's edition but that guy who wrote the love song - I had a little chuckle - but then he had already been seen in a producer audition so it was all set-up so I was bored again.
Worst ever was that child dancing duo with 8 inches of slap each and the stage school brat who forgot her words and started crying.
Don't get me wrong, I like kids, but this isn't the place
Though it's mainly because I personally can't stand kids.
People don't really want to see a tiny little kid, who should technically finish school first, go through the pressures of fame at that age. Hence why even when a child act is supposed to win (series 1 and series 5) they don't.
Along with the fact they just don't have that much appeal. I mean what the hell has a kid got to sing about? They haven't even lived yet.
Most child stars don't continue the success into adulthood anyway, they're more likely to end up in rehab instead. If I had the choice, I'd take success/fame when I'm older thanks. :cool: