Options

Cameron, Miliband and Clegg: The BBC Question Time Debates

145791048

Comments

  • Options
    Sky_GuySky_Guy Posts: 6,859
    Forum Member
    bluefb wrote: »
    Getting it for free (and having to request it) = Begging

    Is that not how the NHS works?:confused:
  • Options
    AdsAds Posts: 37,057
    Forum Member
    ITs good to see Cameron tackle the more stupid questioners. Too often politicians on these shows patronise and fawn over even the most stupid questioners.
  • Options
    BelfastGuy125BelfastGuy125 Posts: 7,515
    Forum Member
    davor wrote: »
    "When my disabled son" using the late son again, very low, though I support Torries over the dirty socialists.

    You're deluded if you think we have any form of socialism in this country.
  • Options
    TanequilTanequil Posts: 367,160
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    The area over Cameron's top lip is getting very damp.
  • Options
    gulliverfoylegulliverfoyle Posts: 6,318
    Forum Member
    Are there any Tories actually in the audience tonight? So far it sounds like every audience member is Labour.

    its the BBC no surprise

    its 3 to 1 lefty to right wing
  • Options
    duncannduncann Posts: 11,969
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    The audience is the usual QT left wing audience. Although it is 'representative'the BBC admitted only 25% are Tories when their share in polls is 34% and at the last election was 37%. UKIP is polling at 14% and in this audience it is around 4%. The LibDems have 25%!!!!
  • Options
    Penny CrayonPenny Crayon Posts: 36,158
    Forum Member
    Tanequil wrote: »
    Why do they have to be open seven days a week have people got sicker over the last five years.

    Because people can't get appointments for two weeks - seven day a week openings means more available appointments.

    I'm no Tory but I think this is a good idea.
  • Options
    2shy20072shy2007 Posts: 52,579
    Forum Member
    Face is getting more dish like as the minutes go on.

    Shiny shiny bad times behind me ;)
  • Options
    LostFoolLostFool Posts: 90,659
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    davor wrote: »
    "When my disabled son" using the late son again, very low, though I support Torries over the dirty socialists.

    What is "low" is people having a go at him every time he mentions is son. It was a defining event in his life so why shouldn't he mention him?
  • Options
    bluefbbluefb Posts: 15,461
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Sky_Guy wrote: »
    Rubbish.

    Yes, more rubbish too.
  • Options
    RecordPlayerRecordPlayer Posts: 22,648
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Are there any Tories actually in the audience tonight? So far it sounds like every audience member is Labour.
    There must be - some have applauded him.
  • Options
    itsashruberyitsashrubery Posts: 8,144
    Forum Member
    Rafer wrote: »
    Not so sure.
    He routinely makes a fool out of Ed at pmqs. I suspect the real reason to be that: while he's better than Ed, He's worse that Nicola, Leanne, Nigel, and Nick.
    Ed would make a mug out of him in a live TV debate head to head and he knew it, that is why Tory HQ said go nowhere near that debate.
    Best decision they have made this campaign
  • Options
    Ethel_FredEthel_Fred Posts: 34,127
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Soppyfan wrote: »
    Well this edition of QT is in Leeds which the seats are mostly held by Labour, so that may be why.
    Why do you think the audience are from Leeds?
  • Options
    Jason CJason C Posts: 31,336
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    LostFool wrote: »
    What is "low" is people having a go at him every time he mentions is son. It was a defining event in his life so why shouldn't he mention him?

    Because it's being used to elicit cheap sympathy to score political points.
  • Options
    Rich Tea.Rich Tea. Posts: 22,048
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Soppyfan wrote: »
    That's another 1% support loss for Cameron after mentoring his disabled son...
    Always brings his disabled son up doesn't he and it really screams as desperate that he needs to keep falling back on that one. Leave your child out of it!

    Using your son for politcal gain is low.
  • Options
    carnoch04carnoch04 Posts: 10,275
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Are there any Tories actually in the audience tonight? So far it sounds like every audience member is Labour.

    This is not PMQ's with planted soft questions from your buddies. The Tories will be out in force once Miliband gets on stage.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 12,830
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    He oozes insincerity.
  • Options
    Sez_babeSez_babe Posts: 133,998
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭
    I like that they keep picking up that he doesn't answer the questions!
  • Options
    Lisa.BLisa.B Posts: 57,275
    Forum Member
    That moustache he's trying to grow in is getting very damp.
  • Options
    RaferRafer Posts: 14,231
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    He's not doing too badly so far. He's getting his points across. He's kept the soundbites to a minimum. Room for improvement though. A few more details would be nice.
  • Options
    2shy20072shy2007 Posts: 52,579
    Forum Member
    LostFool wrote: »
    What is "low" is people having a go at him every time he mentions is son. It was a defining event in his life so why shouldn't he mention him?

    He uses him, he may as well bring out a fluffy kitten, he shamefully cuts services to other disabled children while he claimed DLA and 24 hour respite from an already stretched local authority.
  • Options
    TanequilTanequil Posts: 367,160
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Because people can't get appointments for two weeks - seven day a week openings means more available appointments.

    I'm no Tory but I think this is a good idea.

    I don't go to the Docs often but you are correct it is difficult to get an appointment.
  • Options
    InspirationInspiration Posts: 62,706
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    "The NHS is my life's work" sorry Dave but that sounded like bullshit.
  • Options
    BelfastGuy125BelfastGuy125 Posts: 7,515
    Forum Member
    LostFool wrote: »
    What is "low" is people having a go at him every time he mentions is son. It was a defining event in his life so why shouldn't he mention him?

    There is nothing wrong with mentioning his dead son in a personal piece about his life.

    But I find it very distasteful he always uses his dead son to attempt to prove his love for the NHS when we all know his policies don't support it. It is like he is saying he has to scoop the bottom of the barrel because no one will believe him on his record.
  • Options
    itsashruberyitsashrubery Posts: 8,144
    Forum Member
    its the BBC no surprise

    its 3 to 1 lefty to right wing
    Tory supporters have said this about every debate. The fact is Cameron is hopeless, he cannot answer a single question
Sign In or Register to comment.