Options
Michael Jackson secret code for sex with a young boy revealed....
As part of his lawsuit James Safechuck has spilled the beans about his sexual relationship when aged 10 with Michael Jackson....
James Safechuck -- now 36 -- claims in his lawsuit against the MJ Estate ... the singer started abusing him when he was 10 ... when he traveled with Michael to Paris for the "Bad" tour in 1988.
In new court docs -- obtained by TMZ -- Safechuck says Michael taught him to use code words ... referring to his erection as "bright light, brick city" ... and calling semen, "duck butter."
Safechuck claims Jackson also used secret signals -- when they would hold hands, Michael would scratch the inside of James' hand with a finger ... to show he wanted to have sex.
0
Comments
Duck butter, f*** nutter, what's the diff?
One thing that has become clear though over the last few years is that a lot of victims don't come forward to authorities until they are middle-aged adults (or they do and don't get believed). That doesn't surprise me because young people do bury these kind of things and try to bear them only to have them remain a problem psychologically so it does take time for people to come forward sometimes.
Again, I'm not judging Jacko because I don't know the details but, if there is anything in it, then there's never been a more likely time for more allegations to come out. He's dead, it's post-Savile (and the American football case in the US), and the climate is probably more understanding of those coming forward with allegations than ever before given the recent convictions.
It is difficult to see what fresh evidence anyone can bring to it all though given the time elapsed, unless several came forward with corroborating stories with details only someone close to Jacko would know. You'd think if anything like that was out there that it would have been uncovered by now but maybe not.
I guess we'll see if anyone else comes forward and where it goes.
I've not forgotten the most well known case when allegedly the mother or father of the boy walked in to the bedroom to find the singer knelt in front of the boy performing oral sex on him SAID
NOTHING and just walked out of the room
Superstar or not wouldn't a responcible person have decked him ???
I can only think they just thought of the money and as for this latest case I understood that the states have different laws to the uk re historical cases only allowing so many years for something to be deemed admissible in court
This would I guess mean all the stuff over here would be thrown out
What about Savile? The same could be said for him.
Nobody can be as bad as he was. Hopefully.
So everyone dead is innocent ?
Not sure these new claims add up to much but I think one day most will have to accept he was up to something very wrong with those children.
When accusers stop changing their stories years later and stop asking for multi million $ settlements from his estate I'll start to move closer to believing them. And I'm not a "psychotic fan" as you put it. I'm not even a fan.
i4u: Unlike you to be a month behind with MJ news.
Well someone else had already come forward....Wade Robson who aged 7 spent the night alone in the same bed as Jackson. Wade says he was subsequently abused by Jackson over many years.
The attorney who is looking after Jackson's estate is the same one who brought in criminal private detective Anthony Pellicano to take care of the 1993 allegations which ended up costing Jackson his image and $20m.
Interestingly also in 1993 Pellicano (a private detective) was negotiating on behalf of Jackson a record deal with Wade's mother for her son.
Has Wade Robson made a multi million $ claim against the estate?
And at least MJ faced court when he was alive, unlike Saville.
He wants $1.62bn according to the articles last month. The figure may not be accurate but his claim against the estate is widely reported.
I think Ian Watkins proves that theory wrong unfortunately.
No, what I meant was I have trouble believing it of MJ in particular. Not because I know otherwise, and I'm not a fan of his, he just never seemed to have it in him, but I thought the same for Rolf.
Of course not but nor are they guilty
http://www.answers.com/Q/Did_Jordan_Chandler_admit_he_lied
Thanks for that Lily
Yes it was much as I recalled
It was the father who supposedly walked in on them and as I said earlier on to me no normal father would have walked quietly out and left him to carry on
The sad thing is Michael settled out of court I would suppose just to have it over with
I am a firm believer of what goes around comes around
What I find most disturbing is it would have been bad enough if Jordy had been abused by Mr Jackson BUT how sick for the lads own father to allegedly coach him and tell him in graphic detail about things that many ADULTS wouldn't have knowledge of
Maybe He should be made to answer for all this by the Jackson family but doubtless it will be to late for them to do so as the laws which allow "historical" evidence here are not on statute in the states
http://www.snopes.com/politics/sexuality/chandler.asp
That was indeed the point I was making and exactly why his defence bought up his father apparently watching Jackson and his son in court