EE - If Ronnie loses the baby...

fawltytowers93 · 23/06/14 - 21:01

Then I am DONE with the show, and I mean it. I cannot bear to see her grieve for the 4th time

Please DTC, let it live! It will be a gazillion times more interesting

0...0 · 23/06/14 - 21:08

If she does I want her to scream and crack the earth to its very core!

eaststreetlover · 23/06/14 - 21:10

Fourth time?

O-J · 23/06/14 - 21:10

I really really hope they let her keep the baby!

walford-e20 · 23/06/14 - 21:11

I don't think the baby will die- but Ronnie might...

adamski94 · 23/06/14 - 21:12

eaststreetlover wrote: »

Fourth time?

Danielle, the miscarridge and james

Keyser_Soze1 · 23/06/14 - 21:14

0...0 wrote: »

If she does I want her to scream and crack the earth to its very core!

Empty your box 0...0 - I want to put something in it! ;-)

Dr K Noisewater · 23/06/14 - 21:17

You could count it as more than four. First time she lost a baby was when Archie told her her baby 'Amy' had died and she mourned for her then. Then she discovered Danielle alive and well but then lost her again when she was killed but not before unknowingly convincing Danielle to abort her own grandchild, so that's three. Then miscarried Owen's baby before giving birth to James who died at 1 day old. You could say she has lost five babies and if this one dies its six

[Deleted User] · 23/06/14 - 21:23

Omg! Ronnie' pregnant?!
I haven't been keeping up with eastenders lately

Amazee-Dayzee · 23/06/14 - 21:39

If Ronnie loses baby number 4 then EastEnders will probably have a mass exodus of viewers. NOBODY wants to see Ronnie lose another baby and have to grieve again.

This child is too valuable to lose anyway: the grandchild of Nick Cotton and Archie Mitchell, both psychopaths in their own right and if it is another son watch out since it is the great-grandchild of Philip Mitchell I and Charlie Cotton I, both who were abusive.

Heathyheath_ · 23/06/14 - 21:52

I wasn't aware about Ronnie's pregnancy and hadn't watched the episode yet but I had it spoiled for me on Facebook and there was no way I wouldn't go onto here to see everybody's reaction. I'd hate to see Ronnie heartbroken again, I've always wanted her to have another baby and finally to get some happiness so her pregnancy really makes me happy. I'm not going to lie that I'll be annoyed if anything happens to the baby because she deserves to have a child after her previous heartbreak and I can't wait to hear it

Hit Em Up Style · 23/06/14 - 21:56

I actually doubt Sam would have agreed to the story without knowing what was due to happen. She quit EE remember because Ronnie went too depressing. DTC said he asked Linda Henry if she was ok with the story of Shirley being Mick's mum so I would assume he consulted Sam over this story too.

I think Ronnie will return more happier and normal once she comes back. I always had a feeling the villain thing wouldn't happen because losing Sam from the show would have been a big mistake. Villains do have a shelf life. The fact they seem to have changed tact would suggest they realised it was a mistake.

The_abbott · 23/06/14 - 22:03

Hit Em Up Style wrote: »

I actually doubt Sam would have agreed to the story without knowing what was due to happen. She quit EE remember because Ronnie went too depressing. DTC said he asked Linda Henry if she was ok with the story of Shirley being Mick's mum so I would assume he consulted Sam over this story too.

I think Ronnie will return more happier and normal once she comes back. I always had a feeling the villain thing wouldn't happen because losing Sam from the show would have been a big mistake. Villains do have a shelf life. The fact they seem to have changed tact would suggest they realised it was a mistake.

well either they have retooled her character or baby 4 is due a death which makes her even more crazy but that just boring now.

Chris Mark · 23/06/14 - 22:38

Listen to people on here DTC, we want her child to live and for her misery to end.

thejoyof_pat · 23/06/14 - 22:42

Was it not a producer, not sure if it was DTC, who once said that Ronnie is a character who works best when she gets close to wants she wants but never really gets it?

Hit Em Up Style · 23/06/14 - 22:46

thejoyof_pat wrote: »

Was it not a producer, not sure if it was DTC, who once said that Ronnie is a character who works best when she gets close to wants she wants but never really gets it?

Santer said it when justifying Danielle's death and the ott outrage.

Sorcha_27 · 23/06/14 - 22:46

thejoyof_pat wrote: »

Was it not a producer, not sure if it was DTC, who once said that Ronnie is a character who works best when she gets close to wants she wants but never really gets it?

Yep. I remember reading that. Sounds like dtc too but I don't think that she will lose the baby. Unlike berkwood dtc is a bit more restrained. If berkwood was still there she'd probably have stolen multiple babies. ** rolls eyes at thought of berkwood**

0...0 · 23/06/14 - 22:47

Collins don't preach, we've made up our minds,
She's gonna keep the baby!
Aahhh, keep the baby....

fawltytowers93 · 23/06/14 - 22:47

thejoyof_pat wrote: »

Was it not a producer, not sure if it was DTC, who once said that Ronnie is a character who works best when she gets close to wants she wants but never really gets it?

It was, but that was her old 'tragic heroine' character arc. She's been revitalised since her 2013 return, things are different now. I think she will have a living baby this time - I doubt they'd have bothered making her pregnant in the first place if they just intended to kill it yet again, I think DTC knows it would just piss the viewers off if yet another of her babies died

Sorcha_27 · 23/06/14 - 22:49

0...0 wrote: »

Collins don't preach, we've made up our minds,
She's gonna keep the baby!
Aahhh, keep the baby....

Phil is telling me to give the gun up
Saying I'm too nutty to load it up
But I'm gonna keep my baby and gun!

[Deleted User] · 23/06/14 - 22:51

There's another angle they might take here that no one seems to have mentioned yet.

The baby could be taken away from her by social services, if they feel she is too unstable to keep a child. Remember she did snatch someone elses child and did time for it.

So she might lose the baby, but not through death.

thejoyof_pat · 23/06/14 - 22:53

pjw1985 wrote: »

There's another angle they might take here that no one seems to have mentioned yet.

The baby could be taken away from her by social services, if they feel she is too unstable to keep a child. Remember she did snatch someone elses child and did time for it.

So she might lose the baby, but not through death.

That's exactly how I think it will go.

0...0 · 23/06/14 - 22:55

sorcha_healy27 wrote: »

Phil is telling me to give the gun up
Saying I'm too nutty to load it up
But I'm gonna keep my baby and gun!

You always taught me right from wrong
I need your help Dot, please be strong,
I shagged Charlie 3 ways
And I'm batshit crazeee!

fawltytowers93 · 23/06/14 - 22:55

pjw1985 wrote: »

There's another angle they might take here that no one seems to have mentioned yet.

The baby could be taken away from her by social services, if they feel she is too unstable to keep a child. Remember she did snatch someone elses child and did time for it.

So she might lose the baby, but not through death.

Interesting idea, but it's a bit too similar to Lola/Lexi, which wasn't that long ago

0...0 · 23/06/14 - 22:56

pjw1985 wrote: »

There's another angle they might take here that no one seems to have mentioned yet.

The baby could be taken away from her by social services, if they feel she is too unstable to keep a child. Remember she did snatch someone elses child and did time for it.

So she might lose the baby, but not through death.

Nooooo, even Kat snatching it would be better than that.

fawltytowers93 · 23/06/14 - 22:57

On another note, I do find it interesting that they've made Ronnie and Kat pregnant at the same time again.

Obviously Kat will give birth a long time before Ronnie does though

Hey there!

Quick Links

EE - If Ronnie loses the baby...

Comments