Lets show people a Sony tablet and an ipad to see which they like based on name only. Come on Gadget Show you have proven you can do better than that.
Also Jon made an interesting comment.... You can get better tablets at a cheaper price, so why were they not in the test? The lack of the Nexus tablet in the test just stinks of Gadget Show I devices fix again. The Nexus 10 beats the Ipad in most areas certainly the big 3, price, design, and specs.
Very disappointing Gadget Show.
Have to admit i am also over those Tech thrills with Polly
I'm sorry signal strength is no way to test a router. These are renowned for being inaccurate! They should have at least transferred a few Gb of data and tested transfer speed.
Lets show people a Sony tablet and an ipad to see which they like based on name only. Come on Gadget Show you have proven you can do better than that.
Also Jon made an interesting comment.... You can get better tablets at a cheaper price, so why were they not in the test? The lack of the Nexus tablet in the test just stinks of Gadget Show I devices fix again. The Nexus 10 beats the Ipad in most areas certainly the big 3, price, design, and specs.
Very disappointing Gadget Show.
Have to admit i am also over those Tech thrills with Polly
In what areas does the Nexus 10 beat the iPad? It has more CPU cores, clocked faster but when it comes to anything other than CPU benchmarks (I.e. real world OpenGL benchmarks) it's not even close. The Nexus 10 promised a lot and failed to deliver. I also have a Nexus 7 which really is poor in comparison to an iPad (very sluggish, especially when memory gets more than half full).
Lets show people a Sony tablet and an ipad to see which they like based on name only. Come on Gadget Show you have proven you can do better than that.
Also Jon made an interesting comment.... You can get better tablets at a cheaper price, so why were they not in the test? The lack of the Nexus tablet in the test just stinks of Gadget Show I devices fix again. The Nexus 10 beats the Ipad in most areas certainly the big 3, price, design, and specs.
Very disappointing Gadget Show.
Have to admit i am also over those Tech thrills with Polly
Haven't watched The Gadget Show in over a year and remember it being all about how great Apple were. Was flicking through the channels and it was on and what would you know and Apple is great story, turned off within minutes!
What do you mean? It duplicates a certain part many times so it can be analysed. Whats that got to do with evidence going?
Well OK if it does that fine, but thats not photocopying.
Photocopying could have been an oversimplification?
The implication, for me, was that somehow someone's DNA could be copied and say placed at scene of a local robbery.
Haven't watched The Gadget Show in over a year and remember it being all about how great Apple were. Was flicking through the channels and it was on and what would you know and Apple is great story, turned off within minutes!
Should have watched the last few weeks no mentions atall.
Of course if it is the most popular product it will get mentioned.
Note I said popular, not best.
The implication, for me, was that somehow someone's DNA could be copied and say placed at scene of a local robbery.
No more than taking the sample of your spit or blood could be. You still need the initial sample. I could take your discarded cigarette butt and put it in a crime scene too. DNA isn't the only thing used when finding criminals though. Mind you if you were stood over her body with an axe in your hand saying the PCR did it won't really wash
It's not copying and reproducing the whole sample though. You are taking something from the sample and reproducing it so you can analyse it properly.
Lets show people a Sony tablet and an ipad to see which they like based on name only. Come on Gadget Show you have proven you can do better than that.
Also Jon made an interesting comment.... You can get better tablets at a cheaper price, so why were they not in the test? The lack of the Nexus tablet in the test just stinks of Gadget Show I devices fix again. The Nexus 10 beats the Ipad in most areas certainly the big 3, price, design, and specs.
Very disappointing Gadget Show.
Have to admit i am also over those Tech thrills with Polly
Comments
Or get her and Rachel to do a bikini test ..
Rachel and Polly should be testing out this sort of kit
http://www.ecouterre.com/solar-powered-bikini-soaks-up-the-rays-powers-your-ipod/
Seriously! The hypocrisy in this thread is ridiculous.
(Note: That comment not aimed at anyone in particular.)
Why should age be an issue? Should anyone over a certain age stop having an interest in gadgets and technology and "grow up" ?
Lets show people a Sony tablet and an ipad to see which they like based on name only. Come on Gadget Show you have proven you can do better than that.
Also Jon made an interesting comment.... You can get better tablets at a cheaper price, so why were they not in the test? The lack of the Nexus tablet in the test just stinks of Gadget Show I devices fix again. The Nexus 10 beats the Ipad in most areas certainly the big 3, price, design, and specs.
Very disappointing Gadget Show.
Have to admit i am also over those Tech thrills with Polly
In what areas does the Nexus 10 beat the iPad? It has more CPU cores, clocked faster but when it comes to anything other than CPU benchmarks (I.e. real world OpenGL benchmarks) it's not even close. The Nexus 10 promised a lot and failed to deliver. I also have a Nexus 7 which really is poor in comparison to an iPad (very sluggish, especially when memory gets more than half full).
Because they didn't let people try them or anything.
Polly's section should be called 'Polly travels the world and breaks stuff'. Great value for money.
What do you mean? It duplicates a certain part many times so it can be analysed. Whats that got to do with evidence going?
Haven't watched The Gadget Show in over a year and remember it being all about how great Apple were. Was flicking through the channels and it was on and what would you know and Apple is great story, turned off within minutes!
Well OK if it does that fine, but thats not photocopying.
Photocopying could have been an oversimplification?
The implication, for me, was that somehow someone's DNA could be copied and say placed at scene of a local robbery.
Should have watched the last few weeks no mentions atall.
Of course if it is the most popular product it will get mentioned.
Note I said popular, not best.
No photocopying is a good term.
No more than taking the sample of your spit or blood could be. You still need the initial sample. I could take your discarded cigarette butt and put it in a crime scene too. DNA isn't the only thing used when finding criminals though. Mind you if you were stood over her body with an axe in your hand saying the PCR did it won't really wash
It's not copying and reproducing the whole sample though. You are taking something from the sample and reproducing it so you can analyse it properly.