Hollyoaks - Nancy's Revenge
![[Deleted User]](https://w7.vanillicon.com/v2/7acf7360ca3525e9bb495bb70d9d3ea4.svg)
[Deleted User]
Posts: 3,222 Forum Member
✭✭✭
Has she gone too far? or is she not going far enough?
0
[Deleted User]
Posts: 3,222 [Deleted User]
Posts: 3,222 [Deleted User]
Posts: 3,222 [Deleted User]
Posts: 3,222
Comments
Bit harsh to steal the legend that is Jacks money though!
Stealing Jacks money was very low of her
The Osbournes were quick to believe Sienna, the only one who sided with her was Tom. Her family left her on her own when she needed them the most. I'm team Nancy. She's been through a lot so I don't think it's unrealistic that Nancy would want some sort of revenge.
But she's lowering herself in order to do it. That's what I have a problem with.
They can easily say that her head injury has made her behave out of character.
But...I don't blame her for being majorly miffed. The whole family including Jack and Frankie let her down very badly - even before Sienna started stirring they were unsympathetic about her addiction which is an illness - they should have been supporting her, not taking her kids away. Then she'd ended up spending months in a psych unit and with brain damage. Yes sienna was the culprit but Darren, Jack etc could have stopped it if they'd just trusted her. Plus, let's not forget that Nancy was a little minx when she first came in - of course she's grown up but that aspect of her character is still there.
Yes I think she could have her revenge in a much more classier way and if this were a different soap or real life then she would. I would like to see Nancy get custody of Charlie and Oscar and adopt Tom, that would be revenge.
I don't see how she is lowering herself by wanting Darren to experience some of what she felt. To just sit there and suck it up wouldn't make her a better person, and I cannot see how being the strong fighter she has always been she could possibly just forgive and forget. She must be absolutely furious with all of them and no amount of grovelling by Darren would be enough
Exactly, why did they need to see it with their own eyes to believe Sienna was insane, she was family and Darren's wife but that wasn't enough. I was angry when she said yes, so happy it wasn't genuine.
Well none of the Osborne's believed Nancy and Tom and they both suffered because of it so now they're getting revenge.
Then again, what she went through with Sienna coupled with the brain injury could have made her a more changed woman than we've seen yet.
Paying someone to return Darren's wallet after he swore on his sons life was absolutely terrible. If she wanted revenge then should just have refused to get back together with him.
Tom has no idea what Nancy is doing
I hope this change isn't permanent and is out of her system soon
Tom isn't in on it, is he? I got why Nancy did what she did, I guess I just don't think it fits in with her character
Same here, couldnt think of a better way, Its exactly like what Darren did to her, I'm with Nancy on this one, Im glad shes doing this!
We all know they'll end up getting back together anyway so this is just destroying the relationship even further in the mean time.
Suspension of reality part a zillion.
WHY is Hollyoaks stuffed full of deceitful, self-serving, bizarrely vengeful characters that change like the wind (supposedly representing ordinary people) sleeping with one another's inlaws/round robin bedhopping, playing the Krays in plain sight and having what can only be described as schizoid episodes by turning on/using friends/loved ones rather than just being honest and telling them to get lost?
PS: On the plus side, none of these guys can hold a torch to the mighty flame of awesomeness that is Darren.
Is it just me or is he getting better looking with age?