Sigh, why do they insist on keeping Kim in eastenders?
Kenkennedykenne
Posts: 3,278 Forum Member
✭✭✭
They must have it in their head that she is funny but she really ain't, she's just cringeworthy and her spin-off was the worst thing I have ever seen.
0
Comments
You're joking, Kim had a spin-off:eek: No, I know you're not but seriously she is just awful, the only "saving grace" is that her comedy acting is better than her dramatic acting:eek:
They can't thats the problem. She is a 1 dimensional character. They tried a serious storyline with her but it failed.
That spin off was the final nail in the coffin for me.
Get rid & bring in a decent businesswoman/family to run the B&B
Oh come'on, that storyline ran over 2 episodes. That's hardly trying on the storyliners part.
The problem is: the writers should give further scope on developing more plotlines whether it's funny or tragic (or a mixture of both) for Kim as she doesn't seem to feature a lot in EE lately.
Exactly.
I like Kim. She can be a little bit OTT at times...but there really isn't any character in EE that isn't OTT in one way or another...except maybe Tamwar.
It's not like she is stalking George Michael and raiding the bins for yogurt lids that then became her lucky charm that she got shagged off an 18 year old boy and fell pregnant?
Heather was far fetched, they've not took Kim that far. If anything, that's the problem because they've been doing the same stuff with Kim for a long time. Tameka is more than capable as an actress she has shown in the few times they've let her play a different side to her character. In the wake of the B+B fire, her HIV scare, and even more recently supporting Billy against Tara. She just needs some decent writing to be a strong, unique character, but if they aren't going to bother then they should write her out.
I do agree with Chriss 2005, when she is not playing comedy she is brilliant and i am captivated by the acting, but the forced comedy is just dire
I agree I think she is very funny character and acting is great.