Those Mps who are leaving the Labour Front bench?

bingomanbingoman Posts: 23,934
Forum Member
✭✭✭
What will be there next step(s) and part of the Party are they from, could some of them quit the party and form there own party, go to a different party, stay where they are cause mischief :confused:

Could they one who left the Shadow Cabinet & the new Labour wing of the Party leave a form there own party or stay and try put pressure on Corbyn's Cabinet,:confused:

Could we see some one like Liz Kendall or Yvette Cooper leave the labour party and go to another party or form there own one themselves:confused:
«1

Comments

  • MariesamMariesam Posts: 3,797
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    They might not mind quitting for a few months but I find it hard to imagine many of those who were shadow cabinet members (now ex members) will enjoy being out of the limelight for long......I am guessing they are hoping his leadership will collapse early on, I have a feeling they will be disappointed and might decide to jump ship.....

    If there were ever going to be a split it would have been from left wingers (not now corbyn has been elected) because they tend to be more politically active and motivated to join a cause.....and might have put the effort in more to form their own party.....
  • Biffo the BearBiffo the Bear Posts: 25,859
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    It's disappointing, given that a majority of Labour members voted for Corbyn. Are those resigning saying that all those people got it wrong somehow? I suppose this was always expected in a way though - someone wins on a platform of moving away from the neo-liberal New Labour politics, and so all the subscribers to that ethos have their noses put out of joint.

    Obviously the proof will be in the pudding if the public take to Corbyn's polices, but I think it's shortsighted by these MPs to be throwing the towel in.
  • plateletplatelet Posts: 26,383
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    quietly toe the party line for a year, then assemble the names for a leadership challenge at next years party conference. The resignation is a necessary step
    Hugh Abbot wrote:
    I've missed my ideal resigning point. With every day I delay, it's another year before I can get back again. If I had resigned the day I was appointed, I'd actually be prime minister by now
  • Steve9214Steve9214 Posts: 8,404
    Forum Member
    According to Chukka Amunna's statement - ha cannot serve in a Corbyn shadow Cabinet, as he would not be allowed to campaign for the UK to remain within the EU

    http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1snes8j


    Does Corbyn not understand that Labour is as divided as the Tories on the EU ??

    Wilson allowed a free vote back in the'70's to ensure Labour did not split over Europe.
  • Jol44Jol44 Posts: 21,048
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Steve9214 wrote: »
    According to Chukka Amunna's statement - ha cannot serve in a Corbyn shadow Cabinet, as he would not be allowed to campaign for the UK to remain within the EU

    http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1snes8j


    Does Corbyn not understand that Labour is as divided as the Tories on the EU ??

    Wilson allowed a free vote back in the'70's to ensure Labour did not split over Europe.

    I very much doubt that's the only reason he's choosing to no take part.

    Tired of Chukka Amunna. Now he's a backbencher I hope we see far less of him on TV etc.
  • FMKKFMKK Posts: 32,074
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    It's disappointing, given that a majority of Labour members voted for Corbyn. Are those resigning saying that all those people got it wrong somehow? I suppose this was always expected in a way though - someone wins on a platform of moving away from the neo-liberal New Labour politics, and so all the subscribers to that ethos have their noses put out of joint.

    Obviously the proof will be in the pudding if the public take to Corbyn's polices, but I think it's shortsighted by these MPs to be throwing the towel in.

    These are all the careerist New Labour types who jumped in during the later Blair years. There are a lot of them but they're no good and have achieved little so clearing a few of them out is far from a bad thing, as long as Corbyn can keep his own position secured.

    It does go to show how out of touch they are from the actual membership of the party though.
  • gemma-the-huskygemma-the-husky Posts: 18,116
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    It's disappointing, given that a majority of Labour members voted for Corbyn. Are those resigning saying that all those people got it wrong somehow? I suppose this was always expected in a way though - someone wins on a platform of moving away from the neo-liberal New Labour politics, and so all the subscribers to that ethos have their noses put out of joint.

    Obviously the proof will be in the pudding if the public take to Corbyn's polices, but I think it's shortsighted by these MPs to be throwing the towel in.

    bit in bold. of course. that's exactly what they are saying

    I think it will be very hard to form a new party, for finance reasons mainly. The gang of 4 who formed the social democrats joined with the libs ultimately.

    They either stay and fight, or they join the lib-dems (or tories even). As I said in another thread, it demonstrates that they weren't "true" socialists at heart - so they may as well be lib-dems or centrist tories,

    as we shall see, there aren't many "true" socialists left. certainly not enough to win a GE
  • i4ui4u Posts: 54,948
    Forum Member
    Tom Watson and his mate Len McCluskey arrange for a number of MPs to be deselected prior to the 2020 election by an influx of new members to local areas?

    In the 1980's it was claimed in a documentary a union was swamping certain local Labour party offices with members to oust the sitting Labour MP and get one to their liking. Falkirk, Tom Watson and Len Mcluskey come to mind now they have free reign?
  • alfamalealfamale Posts: 10,309
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    FMKK wrote: »
    These are all the careerist New Labour types who jumped in during the later Blair years. There are a lot of them but they're no good and have achieved little so clearing a few of them out is far from a bad thing, as long as Corbyn can keep his own position secured.

    It does go to show how out of touch they are from the actual membership of the party though.

    Thats the bit that surprised me about all this as its been almost 20 years since Blair began his New Labour project. Yet 20 years on the actual party membership seems as true to their old ideals now as back then. What a huge disconnect, shows how useless and 'Westminster bubble' obsessed the political journalists are that they never realised or informed us this was still the case. Time and again though this was the exact explanation for Labour's collapse in Scotland, "I didnt leave Labour, they left me" i'd heard many a SNP supporter say on tv.

    You can spot the real self obsessed careerist politicians by how loud they scream as they resign. So far Jamie Reed and Chuka have made the biggest huff and puff and self absorbed "look at me" spoutings as they went out the exit door.
  • jenziejenzie Posts: 20,821
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    boohoo for them i guess
    take your ball and play on the back benches
  • HypnodiscHypnodisc Posts: 22,728
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    jenzie wrote: »
    boohoo for them i guess
    take your ball and play on the back benches

    100% this.

    I think the whole situation is rather hilarious really.

    I'm not sure what sort of response idiots like Cooper expect?

    For Labour supporters/the general public to beg them to stay?

    They were crap and put up zero opposition when they were shadow ministers. If it was up to me they'd have been asked to leave a long time ago.
  • Amaretto2Amaretto2 Posts: 2,949
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Corbyn has never towed the line and got behind the party leader he didn't believe in, so why should anyone else?
  • Welsh-ladWelsh-lad Posts: 51,924
    Forum Member
    Very childish and petulant I call it. These people have no grit. Why not stay, at least for a while, and see whether Corbyn can build a consensus with them?
  • MajlisMajlis Posts: 31,362
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Interesting stat of the day - in the last 40 years the Labour Party has had 9 different Leaders, only one of which has won an election but who is now a complete pariah to the Party faithful......:o
  • paulschapmanpaulschapman Posts: 35,536
    Forum Member
    It's disappointing, given that a majority of Labour members voted for Corbyn. Are those resigning saying that all those people got it wrong somehow? I suppose this was always expected in a way though - someone wins on a platform of moving away from the neo-liberal New Labour politics, and so all the subscribers to that ethos have their noses put out of joint.

    Obviously the proof will be in the pudding if the public take to Corbyn's polices, but I think it's shortsighted by these MPs to be throwing the towel in.

    The Labour Party much like the Conservatives is a fairly broach Church. Those who have stood down have kept to their principles - which is more than I would have credited them with.

    Backing a leader they have fundamental disagreements with would have looked self serving. This way they show a principled stand and are able to fight for their own kind of Labour Party.

    There is also a thing known as Cabinet Responsibility - where once a decision is made by Cabinet then members are expected to defend it. Standing down means they will not have to defend a position they fundamentally disagree with.
  • ICON111ICON111 Posts: 3,441
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    They made the right decision for their future career. The Corbyn cabinet will be known to be one of the most toxic regimes that have ever existed. Everyone associated with it will suffer in the future.
  • Barney06Barney06 Posts: 123,853
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭
    The Labour Party much like the Conservatives is a fairly broach Church. Those who have stood down have kept to their principles - which is more than I would have credited them with.

    Backing a leader they have fundamental disagreements with would have looked self serving. This way they show a principled stand and are able to fight for their own kind of Labour Party.

    There is also a thing known as Cabinet Responsibility - where once a decision is made by Cabinet then members are expected to defend it. Standing down means they will not have to defend a position they fundamentally disagree with.

    Step forward Andy Burnham
  • MargMckMargMck Posts: 24,115
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    ICON111 wrote: »
    They made the right decision for their future career. The Corbyn cabinet will be known to be one of the most toxic regimes that have ever existed. Everyone associated with it will suffer in the future.

    Good, I hope you are right, particularly in Andy Burnham's case.
  • clinchclinch Posts: 11,574
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Steve9214 wrote: »
    According to Chukka Amunna's statement - ha cannot serve in a Corbyn shadow Cabinet, as he would not be allowed to campaign for the UK to remain within the EU

    http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1snes8j


    Does Corbyn not understand that Labour is as divided as the Tories on the EU ??

    Wilson allowed a free vote back in the'70's to ensure Labour did not split over Europe.

    You've got it the wrong way round. Chukka was wanting Corbyn to guarantee that Labour would campaign to stay in the EU. It's Chukka that doesn't want a free vote.
    He claimed on Sunday night that the decision was made because he had not received unambiguous assurances a Corbyn leadership would support Britain’s continued membership of the European Union in the coming referendum.

    http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/sep/13/chuka-umunna-quits-over-jeremy-corbyns-eu-stance
  • Steve9214Steve9214 Posts: 8,404
    Forum Member
    clinch wrote: »
    You've got it the wrong way round. Chukka was wanting Corbyn to guarantee that Labour would campaign to stay in the EU. It's Chukka that doesn't want a free vote.



    http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/sep/13/chuka-umunna-quits-over-jeremy-corbyns-eu-stance

    Wishful thinking on my part maybe - I just want to see Corbyn and Farage sharing the same platform !!!!
  • AnnsyreAnnsyre Posts: 109,504
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭
    bingoman wrote: »
    What will be there next step(s) and part of the Party are they from, could some of them quit the party and form there own party, go to a different party, stay where they are cause mischief :confused:

    Could they one who left the Shadow Cabinet & the new Labour wing of the Party leave a form there own party or stay and try put pressure on Corbyn's Cabinet,:confused:

    Could we see some one like Liz Kendall or Yvette Cooper leave the labour party and go to another party or form there own one themselves:confused:

    They will wait patiently until Corbyn is replaced and one of them will be the next leader.

    They haven't left the Labour Party they are just going to be sitting on different benches.
  • AliceyAlicey Posts: 5,294
    Forum Member
    Corbyn never served in the upper levels of the party despite being an MP for over 30 years. He also rebelled against the party constantly. I don't see why Cooper, Reed, Kendall etc should be condemned for doing what Corbyn himself did for decades and not compromising their principles.
  • AnnsyreAnnsyre Posts: 109,504
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭
    Welsh-lad wrote: »
    Very childish and petulant I call it. These people have no grit. Why not stay, at least for a while, and see whether Corbyn can build a consensus with them?

    They are staying they just wont be sitting on the front benches.
  • mossy2103mossy2103 Posts: 84,308
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    It's disappointing, given that a majority of Labour members voted for Corbyn. Are those resigning saying that all those people got it wrong somehow?
    they are saying that their beliefs & principles are at odd with those of the leader. Just like Corbyn as done over many years and 500 rebellions against his own party line. People on here were praising Corbyn for sticking to his principles.

    What's sauce for the goose .....
  • RecordPlayerRecordPlayer Posts: 22,648
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Barney06 wrote: »
    Step forward Andy Burnham

    Andy Burham is coming across as a bit of a 'yes man.'
Sign In or Register to comment.