Scottish Fitba Thread (Part 19)

14748505253163

Comments

  • timboytimboy Posts: 30,094
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    bhoy07 wrote: »
    Rangers know fine well who the panel was so what is McCoist's game?

    Bullets and bombs????

    All 3 now named on FF and one FFer claims he phoned the SFA today and was told that someone who was named as being on the panel has already been threatened.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 1,040
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Any sympathy I had for Rangers is slowly fading away. They must not be as naive they are making out.
  • misawa97misawa97 Posts: 11,579
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Mark. wrote: »
    Has anyone seen Jim Traynor's latest?

    Verge of tears doesn't sum it up.

    heard him on the bbc podcast yesterday and it was embarrasing.
  • roland ratroland rat Posts: 13,829
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    timboy wrote: »
    Calum Murray to referee the Glasgow derby on Sunday.

    Will this game go ahead, and will it be rangers last game
  • timboytimboy Posts: 30,094
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    roland rat wrote: »
    Will this game go ahead, and will it be rangers last game

    Yes, the game will go ahead. No, it won't be Rangers last match.

    At the very least they''ll see out the end of the season.
  • bhoy07bhoy07 Posts: 25,036
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Sportsound to have statement from judicial panel member.
  • misawa97misawa97 Posts: 11,579
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    bhoy07 wrote: »
    Sportsound to have statement from judicial panel member.

    McCoists interview yesterday was disgraceful. He went below the belt and only caused hysteria and some attempted witch hunt by rangers fans against the so called 3 who are a secret to him. The SFA should do him for that.
  • bhoy07bhoy07 Posts: 25,036
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Judicial Panel member tells BBC Scotland he is reconsidering their position as a JP member, however they hope that once the reasons are published within the next few days 'reasonable people' will understand why they reached their decision.
  • CELT1987CELT1987 Posts: 12,355
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    bhoy07 wrote: »
    Judicial Panel member tells BBC Scotland he is reconsidering their position as a JP member, however they hope that once the reasons are published within the next few days 'reasonable people' will understand why they reached their decision.
    That will rule out most of the ones on FF then.
  • bhoy07bhoy07 Posts: 25,036
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    One other thing that is puzzling, On the one hand Duff and Phelps along with McCoist etc... want the SFA to completely blame Craig Whyte and let them off the hook.

    On the other Duff and Phelps are involved in a lawsuit on behalf of Rangers FC against Collyer Bristow for the actions of Gary Withey - they seem to think CB are responsible.

    Funny that.
  • bhoy07bhoy07 Posts: 25,036
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Celtic release details of season ticket renewals.

    Nothing out of the ordinary until you get to the first footnote:

    *Applies to Under-13 Opt-out and Under-13 Special Season Tickets which exclude games against Rangers FC (or a successor to it).
  • bhoy07bhoy07 Posts: 25,036
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    SFA Statement just released:

    “We are deeply concerned that the safety and security of Judicial Panel members appointed to a recent Tribunal has been compromised by a wholly irresponsible betrayal of confidential information.

    “The Judicial Panel consists of volunteers from across the spectrum of sport and business in Scotland. They are appointed on the basis of anonymity yet all three panel members have reported intrusion into their personal and work lives, including abusive and threatening communication.

    “This has been extended to directors of the Scottish FA, whose private details have been published on internet sites and who have, themselves, been victims of abusive communication.

    “This culminated tonight in a visit by Strathclyde Police, who are taking seriously the threats made towards the individuals involved. We are thankful for their advice and support in these matters.”
  • timboytimboy Posts: 30,094
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    bhoy07 wrote: »
    SFA Statement just released:

    “We are deeply concerned that the safety and security of Judicial Panel members appointed to a recent Tribunal has been compromised by a wholly irresponsible betrayal of confidential information.

    “The Judicial Panel consists of volunteers from across the spectrum of sport and business in Scotland. They are appointed on the basis of anonymity yet all three panel members have reported intrusion into their personal and work lives, including abusive and threatening communication.

    “This has been extended to directors of the Scottish FA, whose private details have been published on internet sites and who have, themselves, been victims of abusive communication.

    “This culminated tonight in a visit by Strathclyde Police, who are taking seriously the threats made towards the individuals involved. We are thankful for their advice and support in these matters.”

    McCoist has messed this one up very badly for Rangers, especially since Jim Spence has tweeted this.
    One member of independent panel in Rangers case says he has received advice from Special branch regarding suspect packages.
  • bhoy07bhoy07 Posts: 25,036
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    The SFA would be best served just passing it all over to UEFA and ask them to deal with it as clearly there are concerns about safety.
  • timboytimboy Posts: 30,094
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    bhoy07 wrote: »
    The SFA would be best served just passing it all over to UEFA and ask them to deal with it as clearly there are concerns about safety.

    I'll be honest enough to say that we can't really take a moral high ground here as our support have smashed a few windows in their time but last season was just off the scale.
  • croftercrofter Posts: 2,976
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    bhoy07 wrote: »
    This season has proved that Celtic will not win the treble every season. It's a chance for SPL sides to step up and challenge.

    Wasn't that just bad refereeing or are you now admitting that you guys were not good enough ... what's it to be.:p
  • bhoy07bhoy07 Posts: 25,036
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    timboy wrote: »
    I'll be honest enough to say that we can't really take a moral high ground here as our support have smashed a few windows in their time but last season was just off the scale.

    Last season should have been the watershed with regard to this sort of thing.

    Fortunately I think McCoist is losing sympathy within the press fast - albeit the usual suspects are still backing him.
  • timboytimboy Posts: 30,094
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    bhoy07 wrote: »
    Last season should have been the watershed with regard to this sort of thing.

    Fortunately I think McCoist is losing sympathy within the press fast - albeit the usual suspects are still backing him.

    You'd have thought so but alas no.

    No doubt the same paper who ran a back page demanding to know who made the decision will be telling us in the morning how terrible it is that people have allegedly been threatened.
  • bhoy07bhoy07 Posts: 25,036
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    What makes a leading QC qualified enough to sit on a judicial panel?

    This is the kind of questions Mark Hately wants answered regarding the 'three stooges' as he calls them.

    The man is beyond parody.
  • TommyNookaTommyNooka Posts: 2,396
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    bhoy07 wrote: »
    What makes a leading QC qualified enough to sit on a judicial panel?

    This is the kind of questions Mark Hately wants answered regarding the 'three stooges' as he calls them.

    The man is beyond parody.


    The thickest man in 'journalism'(ahem) and that takes some doing.
  • TommyNookaTommyNooka Posts: 2,396
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Just read that Lee Miller has lost his wife, very sad, she wasn't even 30 years old! :(
  • misawa97misawa97 Posts: 11,579
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    bhoy07 wrote: »
    What makes a leading QC qualified enough to sit on a judicial panel?

    This is the kind of questions Mark Hately wants answered regarding the 'three stooges' as he calls them.

    The man is beyond parody.

    Yet if there was no transfer embargo these questions wouldnt be asked.

    What idiots like Hateley and Ally dont seem to understand is the clubs wanted the independent panel.
  • TommyNookaTommyNooka Posts: 2,396
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    misawa97 wrote: »
    Yet if there was no transfer embargo these questions wouldnt be asked.

    What idiots like Hateley and Ally dont seem to understand is the clubs wanted the independent panel.

    You only have to look at the headlines today to know why it was decided that these panels should remain anonymous.
    I don't believe for one minute that McCoist isn't smart enough to know this which makes his comments even more of a disgrace.
  • bhoy07bhoy07 Posts: 25,036
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    When in doubt, wheel Walter out.

    The cardigan backs McCoist's view about the panel, yet no one can explain why McCoist was making things up.

    1. Rangers did know who these people were on the panel.
    2. The FA have not being helping Portsmouth in the manner McCoist suggested.
    3. The football league have not been going out of their way to help Portsmouth.
    4. The money Portsmouth received was just what was already due to be paid, championship clubs all get £200k a month and the FL just said this would continue.

    For McCoist to say otherwise is disingenuous at best.
This discussion has been closed.