Jeremy should have gotten another chance. On conditions of no alcohol during his stay in the house and close observation etc. He is intimidating though.
Chloe IMO milked the moment. Yes, I am sure it was distressing but she over reacted.
Ken was outrageous tonight. IMO. However, the housemates need to stop paying him so much attention. Why do they allow themselves to get wound up by him.
Ive just watched the Chloe incident. She certainly milked the moment and was looking at the camera. In the diary room she is not crying as there are no tears. However, what he did was not right. It is probably for the best that hes gone and hopefully he can get the treatment he needs.
I agree by some reason he managed to bypass the psch evaluation....... Maybe the dollar sign was more prevulant but whatever ther chap needs help nada good 3months. In rehab lets hope he gets it
What 'act'? He didn't touch her, let alone rape her.
This business of seeing offence in so many little ways is getting beyond healthy now.
And what double standards. Think about that Irish git who won £500 k after threatening Deana with an epilator or Helen last summer who WON despite her nastiness and bullying.
If Chloe hadn't become hysterical but slapped his face or something, none of this nonsense would have happened. IMO!
And no, I don't think Jeremy should have got away scot free with doing that but neither is it a hanging offence.
Maybe BB should remind Ken that he is contracted to stay until voted out. If he is removed the contract is broken and he dont get paid
If he goes it is up to him.
Look at it from C5 point of view.
Ken being an arsse
Chloe...from the looks of things on this forum alone , is hated for crying over something so small that got poor ickle jeremy kicked out. :rolleyes:
This eviction is between Chloe and Ken when it comes to the producers.
Think about it.
If my memory serves me right, following Daley and Hazel's situation, this forum was full of posts asking why Hazel hadn't been removed for pulling Daley's shorts down but tonight it's an overreaction for them to do exactly that?
They got criticism for not removing Hazel and are now getting criticism for removing Jeremy?
Ive just watched the Chloe incident. She certainly milked the moment and was looking at the camera. In the diary room she is not crying as there are no tears. However, what he did was not right. It is probably for the best that hes gone and hopefully he can get the treatment he needs.
Agreed with all of that. I got the impression she was milking it, but incident was enough in itself.
Upsetting that the majority of people in this thread think that they have a right to consider what's an "over reaction" when someone has their body violated in such a disgusting way. Is that the sort of thing we want people to get away with? Re-evaluate your views.
Comments
I thought the 'p' word and 'n' word were covered by the warning about language when in conversation with Alexander but I might be wrong.
I think Michelle was upset or angered but handled it well. She took the same approach as Alexander.
Not going to lose the voting money by cancelling the eviction is my guess. He will probably leave on Tuesday.
Maybe BB should remind Ken that he is contracted to stay until voted out. If he is removed the contract is broken and he dont get paid
In saying that I feel sorry for Jeremy. He's all sorts of messed up but he was 100% wrong here and he had to go.
Ignore the red face a slip of the finger
Ive just watched the Chloe incident. She certainly milked the moment and was looking at the camera. In the diary room she is not crying as there are no tears. However, what he did was not right. It is probably for the best that hes gone and hopefully he can get the treatment he needs.
Chloe knew how to play it very tactical.
Poor Jeremy
Probably not
Agreed.
Katie / Michelle / Keith
Bottom 3
Perez / Nadia / Ken
Eviction
Want Chloe to go, think long term she offers nothing to the show. This is based on the conditions that Ken tones it down till Tuesday.
So where is the line? Since Chloe is 'overreacting' about a strange man pulling down her clothes and grabbing her breast. When he grabs her crotch?
Poor Jeremy? You've got to be ****ing kidding.
Agree
If he goes it is up to him.
Look at it from C5 point of view.
Ken being an arsse
Chloe...from the looks of things on this forum alone , is hated for crying over something so small that got poor ickle jeremy kicked out. :rolleyes:
This eviction is between Chloe and Ken when it comes to the producers.
Think about it.
And the money keeps rolling in........
He never grabbed her. He moved her robe.
Never said otherwise, not sure why I'm quoted!
Also, as above. He never grabbed her. He never actually touched her.
They got criticism for not removing Hazel and are now getting criticism for removing Jeremy?
I thought he pulled open her robe , he did not pull it down or touch her skin. He has gone and rightly so, but she has over reacted for the camera.
He didn't grab her breast.