Dan was right but that argument had nothing to do with him so why did he get involved in the first place. And we have to see Jemimas side as well, maybe she is still traumatized because of this and couldn´t comprehend what Dan was trying to tell her. So i can´t vote for anyone.
But I will say that I completely understood why Jemima took exception to what Jackie said....at first.
Up until that point I agreed with Jemima and that Jackie was assuming too much about all the other housemates' lives.
But Jemima really shouldn't have used her daughter story to make her point. That was a mistake.
Exactly! It was only when Gina was so shocked and said really and asked her to explain that she told them that her daughter was 18 months at the time and she revived her! She tried to deceive them that she had actually lost her daughter! But like Dan said "She did not die":mad:
Agreed. Jemima deliberately misled the HMs into thinking her daughter actually died, to garner some sympathy from the HMs and make the situation all about her. And to get one up on, Jackie. I think it's quite disgusting how Jemima used her daughter in such a way. I really dislike her - she's attention seeking, tactless and plain nasty. Dan was right to challenge Jemima on her behaviour.
I don't like Dan .... fair to say he's top of my "want to stamp on his face" list but ..... he definitely gained a brownie point tonight.
Jemima turned the whole thing into a contest of who's the most hard done by. I HATE people like that. It was about Charlie, NOT her !!! Hearing Jemima then criticizing Jackie to her daughter ... I think Dan was justified in stepping in. Once again Jemima HAD to turn in back to all about her. I got wot Dan was trying to say but she was too bleeding thick to get it :rolleyes:
Oh right. A choice between a slightly pissed someone reliving one of the scariest moments of their lives and a slightly pissed someone pissed off with them who should have learned in their trade as a policeman to be sensitive, and being absolutely not.
Especially as he was supposedly involved in investigating the Saville affair.
Would you want someone with his sensitivity level dealing with your trauma?
Comments
But I will say that I completely understood why Jemima took exception to what Jackie said....at first.
Up until that point I agreed with Jemima and that Jackie was assuming too much about all the other housemates' lives.
But Jemima really shouldn't have used her daughter story to make her point. That was a mistake.
He got dragged down to her level and he will regret that today
Jemima's drunken "me, me, me" rant, using her daughter was vile.
Why was Jemima involved. Was it not between Charlie and Hazel?
Agreed. Jemima deliberately misled the HMs into thinking her daughter actually died, to garner some sympathy from the HMs and make the situation all about her. And to get one up on, Jackie. I think it's quite disgusting how Jemima used her daughter in such a way. I really dislike her - she's attention seeking, tactless and plain nasty. Dan was right to challenge Jemima on her behaviour.
Wheres the option . Both as bad ss each other .
Jemima turned the whole thing into a contest of who's the most hard done by. I HATE people like that. It was about Charlie, NOT her !!! Hearing Jemima then criticizing Jackie to her daughter ... I think Dan was justified in stepping in. Once again Jemima HAD to turn in back to all about her. I got wot Dan was trying to say but she was too bleeding thick to get it :rolleyes:
Especially as he was supposedly involved in investigating the Saville affair.
Would you want someone with his sensitivity level dealing with your trauma?