Options

So the 40% tax threshold falls once again...

HelicaseHelicase Posts: 4,791
Forum Member
✭✭✭
I notice this is a very seldom mentioned topic.

The 40% tax threshold is to fall to just over £32,000

How long before low paid people will fall into this tax bracket?

This along with the increase in the tax allowance is quite obviously a scheme to impose a single tiered tax system, the rate being a blanket 40%.

Thoughts anyone?
«134

Comments

  • Options
    flagpoleflagpole Posts: 44,641
    Forum Member
    Helicase wrote: »
    I notice this is a very seldom mentioned topic.

    The 40% tax threshold is to fall to just over £32,000

    How long before low paid people will fall into this tax bracket?

    This along with the increase in the tax allowance is quite obviously a scheme to impose a single tiered tax system, the rate being a blanket 40%.

    Thoughts anyone?

    What do you understand the word 'obvious' to mean?
  • Options
    Turnbull2000Turnbull2000 Posts: 7,588
    Forum Member
    Helicase wrote: »
    I notice this is a very seldom mentioned topic.

    The 40% tax threshold is to fall to just over £32,000

    How long before low paid people will fall into this tax bracket?

    This along with the increase in the tax allowance is quite obviously a scheme to impose a single tiered tax system, the rate being a blanket 40%.

    Thoughts anyone?

    I gather that's £32,000 + your allowance? So you have to earn around 40ish before being hit by 40%?
  • Options
    BrokenArrowBrokenArrow Posts: 21,665
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    The absolute worse possible income to be on is somewhere between 50-60K

    At this point possibly up to 70% of all your income goes in tax.

    This is when you add in all the other stealth taxes include council tax, fuel duty, VAT alcohol and tabbaco etc etc.
  • Options
    Turnbull2000Turnbull2000 Posts: 7,588
    Forum Member
    The absolute worse possible income to be on is somewhere between 50-60K

    At this point possibly up to 70% of all your income goes in tax.

    This is when you add in all the other stealth taxes include council tax, fuel duty, VAT alcohol and tabbaco etc etc.

    If you're a graduate on over 40k, chances are you'll be losing 49% at PAYE alone thanks to 9% student loan deductions!
  • Options
    HelicaseHelicase Posts: 4,791
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I gather that's £32,000 + your allowance? So you have to earn around 40ish before being hit by 40%?

    No - it applies as follows

    £0 - £9440 is not taxed

    £9441 - £32010 is taxed at 20%

    £32011 - £150000 is taxed at 40%

    £150000 and over is taxed at 45%
  • Options
    flagpoleflagpole Posts: 44,641
    Forum Member
    The absolute worse possible income to be on is somewhere between 50-60K

    At this point possibly up to 70% of all your income goes in tax.

    This is when you add in all the other stealth taxes include council tax, fuel duty, VAT alcohol and tabbaco etc etc.

    The marginal rate is 70% surely. It's not exactly the same, but it's still ****ed up.
  • Options
    flagpoleflagpole Posts: 44,641
    Forum Member
    Helicase wrote: »
    No - it applies as follows

    £0 - £9440 is not taxed

    £9441 - £32010 is taxed at 20%

    £32011 - £150000 is taxed at 40%

    £150000 and over is taxed at 45%

    That is not correct.

    The confusion is because over £100k for every £2 you lose £1 of allowance. Which is why the 150k is a round number.

    You get your allowance on top of the 32k
  • Options
    Turnbull2000Turnbull2000 Posts: 7,588
    Forum Member
    Helicase wrote: »
    No - it applies as follows

    £0 - £9440 is not taxed

    £9441 - £32010 is taxed at 20%

    £32011 - £150000 is taxed at 40%

    £150000 and over is taxed at 45%

    You sure? I'm pretty certain that £32010 is stacked on top of the allowance, meaning only earnings above £41450 (9440+32010) are taxed at 40%.

    £41450 is still too low mind. What used to be the higher rate now affects many middle earners.
  • Options
    DingbatDingbat Posts: 2,930
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Helicase wrote: »
    No - it applies as follows

    £0 - £9440 is not taxed

    £9441 - £32010 is taxed at 20%

    £32011 - £150000 is taxed at 40%

    £150000 and over is taxed at 45%

    Where do you get those figures from?

    According to the BBC...


    In the current tax year, which ends on 5 April, people aged under 65 can earn £8,105 a year before they pay income tax.

    Known as the personal allowance, this level will increase to £9,440 for the tax year 2013-14, starting on 6 April.

    This level was extended in the Autumn Statement, meaning that more lower-paid workers will not see their income taxed.

    The next £32,010 earned will be taxed at 20%, with the 40% tax band starting at £41,451.

    Another big change in April is that income of more than £150,000 will face a 45%, rather than 50% tax rate.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-21672294
  • Options
    HelicaseHelicase Posts: 4,791
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Dingbat wrote: »
    Where do you get those figures from?

    According to the BBC...


    In the current tax year, which ends on 5 April, people aged under 65 can earn £8,105 a year before they pay income tax.

    Known as the personal allowance, this level will increase to £9,440 for the tax year 2013-14, starting on 6 April.

    This level was extended in the Autumn Statement, meaning that more lower-paid workers will not see their income taxed.

    The next £32,010 earned will be taxed at 20%, with the 40% tax band starting at £41,451.

    Another big change in April is that income of more than £150,000 will face a 45%, rather than 50% tax rate.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-21672294

    I got my figures from the HMRC website.
  • Options
    MartinPMartinP Posts: 31,358
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    flagpole wrote: »
    The confusion is because over £100k for every £2 you lose £1 of allowance. Which is why the 150k is a round number.

    Can you explain the thinking? What's the 150k number got to do with the reduction of the personal allowance? :confused:
  • Options
    flagpoleflagpole Posts: 44,641
    Forum Member
    Helicase wrote: »
    I got my figures from the HMRC website.

    It's just the way they phrase it.

    This is a bit old but read http://www.taxfix.co.uk/forum/articles/how-much-can-you-earn-before-paying-40-tax.html
  • Options
    MartinPMartinP Posts: 31,358
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Helicase wrote: »
    I got my figures from the HMRC website.

    You have misunderstood the information. The tax bands are above the personal allowance up to £100k when you start to lose your personal allowance.

    http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/rates/it.htm
  • Options
    flagpoleflagpole Posts: 44,641
    Forum Member
    MartinP wrote: »
    Can you explain the thinking? What's the 150k number got to do with the reduction of the personal allowance? :confused:

    Well because we all know that the 45% kicks in at exactly 150k. I'm trying to explain why that figure is right, or doesn't require the personal allowance adding to it, but the 32k figure does.
  • Options
    DingbatDingbat Posts: 2,930
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Helicase wrote: »
    I got my figures from the HMRC website.

    But where you're going wrong is in not adding the basic personal allowance into the other figures.

    So £9440 is tax free
    Up to £41450 (£9440 + £32010) is taxed at 20% of anything earned over £9440.

    So the 40% band only starts when you earn more than £41451.
  • Options
    MartinPMartinP Posts: 31,358
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    flagpole wrote: »
    Well because we all know that the 45% kicks in at exactly 150k. I'm trying to explain why that figure is right, or doesn't require the personal allowance adding to it, but the 32k figure does.

    OK, gotcha.

    The only people who will be worse off are those earning £100k - £150k according to the BBC
  • Options
    LostFoolLostFool Posts: 90,662
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    You sure? I'm pretty certain that £32010 is stacked on top of the allowance, meaning only earnings above £41450 (9440+32010) are taxed at 40%.

    £41450 is still too low mind. What used to be the higher rate now affects many middle earners.

    Yes, you are right. The others are wrong. The £32010 is on top of your allowance so depending on what that is, you are a Higher Rate tax payer at around £42,000. if you have additional taxable work benefits then you could be paying 40% on less money than that.

    £42,000 is still a decent amount of money but adjusted for inflation it's a long way below where the upper band used to come in. I think the number of higher rate payers has doubled in the last 10 years or so.
  • Options
    HelicaseHelicase Posts: 4,791
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Dingbat wrote: »
    Where do you get those figures from?

    According to the BBC...


    In the current tax year, which ends on 5 April, people aged under 65 can earn £8,105 a year before they pay income tax.

    Known as the personal allowance, this level will increase to £9,440 for the tax year 2013-14, starting on 6 April.

    This level was extended in the Autumn Statement, meaning that more lower-paid workers will not see their income taxed.

    The next £32,010 earned will be taxed at 20%, with the 40% tax band starting at £41,451.

    Another big change in April is that income of more than £150,000 will face a 45%, rather than 50% tax rate.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-21672294

    Having read that article by the BBC, it contradicts the HMRC website somewhat.

    The BBC suggest the 40% band kicks in £32,011 above the £9440 allowance. The HMRC website suggests however this is at earnings of £32,011.
  • Options
    flagpoleflagpole Posts: 44,641
    Forum Member
    LostFool wrote: »
    Yes, you are right. The others are wrong.

    There is only one poster who got it wrong. Everyone else got it right.
  • Options
    flagpoleflagpole Posts: 44,641
    Forum Member
    Helicase wrote: »
    Having read that article by the BBC, it contradicts the HMRC website somewhat.

    The BBC suggest the 40% band kicks in £32,011 above the £9440 allowance. The HMRC website suggests however this is at earnings of £32,011.

    There is no debate here.
  • Options
    LostFoolLostFool Posts: 90,662
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Helicase wrote: »
    Having read that article by the BBC, it contradicts the HMRC website somewhat.

    The BBC suggest the 40% band kicks in £32,011 above the £9440 allowance. The HMRC website suggests however this is at earnings of £32,011.

    The HMRC tables are always without the personal allowance as different people can have different allowances.

    See: http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/rates/it.htm
  • Options
    Jol44Jol44 Posts: 21,048
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I shouldn't worry too much, there are people out there who can't afford to eat.
  • Options
    alanwarwicalanwarwic Posts: 28,396
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    HMRC certainly miswords that.

    It is 40% on £32,011+ above the starting threshold.
    Its discussion as much as debate.
  • Options
    flagpoleflagpole Posts: 44,641
    Forum Member
    Jol44 wrote: »
    I shouldn't worry too much, there are people out there who can't afford to eat.

    Do you post that in every thread?
  • Options
    EmmersonneEmmersonne Posts: 4,532
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Each band is taxed separately, OP, so if you earn over the 42k, only your earnings in excess of the basic rate band would be taxed at that rate.

    The higher rate limit is coming down to pay for the nil rate band going up. I believe it works out to the same amount, so there would be very little difference to you if you were a higher rate tax payer, but not an additional rate taxpayer.
Sign In or Register to comment.