Ched Evans

walterwhitewalterwhite Posts: 56,818
Forum Member
http://news.sky.com/story/1317716/petition-to-stop-ched-evans-sheffield-return

I'm kind of torn with this one. While I fully believe that anyone should be allowed to carry on with their life, I also probably wouldn't want him playing for my club.
«13456767

Comments

  • Watcher #1Watcher #1 Posts: 9,040
    Forum Member
    http://news.sky.com/story/1317716/petition-to-stop-ched-evans-sheffield-return

    I'm kind of torn with this one. While I fully believe that anyone should be allowed to carry on with their life, I also probably wouldn't want him playing for my club.

    As a Blade, I'm completely torn (although this is not new news - must have been a slow day at sky).

    On the one hand, he will have served the custodial part of his sentence, and be deemed fit to be released. On that basis, he should be allowed to work. Lots of professional footballers have returned to playing after going to jail.

    On the other hand, do I really want my team to be best know for having a convicted rapist as a player? Would it adversely affect the team? Indeed, would the other players want to play with him?

    Of course, the only reason why this is even newsworthy is because for that season, Evans was playing brilliantly. If he had been crap, no-one would care what happens on his release
  • celesticelesti Posts: 25,967
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    We were Marlon King's return to the game after his sentence for assault. While it was nice to have a player of ability who wouldn't have been on our radar without all the unpleasantness and it was right that he resume his career, it was very hard to enjoy any of it no matter how much you could justify it as fine.
  • homer2012homer2012 Posts: 5,216
    Forum Member
    Personally i wouldnt allow him to play for any club but thats just me.
  • GeneralissimoGeneralissimo Posts: 6,289
    Forum Member
    He should never have been convicted in the first place, so he should be allowed to resume his career and live his life.
  • walterwhitewalterwhite Posts: 56,818
    Forum Member
    homer2012 wrote: »
    Personally i wouldnt allow him to play for any club but thats just me.

    Why though? He's served his time, are you saying he shouldn't be allowed to work again?
  • walterwhitewalterwhite Posts: 56,818
    Forum Member
    He should never have been convicted in the first place, so he should be allowed to resume his career and live his life.

    I wondered how long that would take.

    Which bit of him being convicted in a court of law and not finding any grounds to appeal since do you think is wrong?
  • Grim FandangoGrim Fandango Posts: 4,038
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    http://news.sky.com/story/1317716/petition-to-stop-ched-evans-sheffield-return

    I'm kind of torn with this one. While I fully believe that anyone should be allowed to carry on with their life, I also probably wouldn't want him playing for my club.

    Yeah, I think that's a perfectly reasonable position to take. He's served his sentence and therefore I believe he should be allowed to continue with his life, and of course that involves being able to return to his profession of choosing. However, football is a high profile profession with an almost unique social and cultural element. I think fans have every right to still be appalled by his crime, and express a desire not to have him at their club.

    You could maybe draw a parallel with the way people may turn their backs on particular entertainers who have committed crimes. Football is even more intense because you're being asked to actively cheer someone on, rather than say in the case of a film director where the art can, to a certain extent, be separated from the maker more easily.
  • GeneralissimoGeneralissimo Posts: 6,289
    Forum Member
    I wondered how long that would take.

    Which bit of him being convicted in a court of law and not finding any grounds to appeal since do you think is wrong?

    1. There was absolutely no evidence presented that the victim either did not consent, or was too intoxicated to give informed consent.

    2. Evans co-accused, the one who met and took her to the hotel, was acquitted. If she was capable of consenting to him, then why wasn't she capable of consenting to Evans?

    3. The victim boasted to her friends about getting a 'big win' after the trial.

    Juries sometimes make big mistakes - and this was one such case.
  • homer2012homer2012 Posts: 5,216
    Forum Member
    Convicted rapist shouldnt be allowed to work with women again, yes the clubs do have female staff there.

    As for the he wasnt guilty, well he was found guilty and no matter what we think the jury made the verdict on the evidence presented. FACT!
  • The_don1The_don1 Posts: 17,418
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    homer2012 wrote: »
    Convicted rapist shouldnt be allowed to work with women again, yes the clubs do have female staff there.

    As for the he wasnt guilty, well he was found guilty and no matter what we think the jury made the verdict on the evidence presented. FACT!

    Since working in any field means you be working with women with that view point no convicted rapist should ever be allowed to work again? So the taxpayer will be funding them for life?
  • Grim FandangoGrim Fandango Posts: 4,038
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    homer2012 wrote: »
    Convicted rapist shouldnt be allowed to work with women again, yes the clubs do have female staff there.

    Odd idea. Would you also prevent him socialising with women?
  • Grim FandangoGrim Fandango Posts: 4,038
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    The_don1 wrote: »
    Since working in any field means you be working with women with that view point no convicted rapist should ever be allowed to work again? So the taxpayer will be funding them for life?

    Heh, yeah, I was struggling to think of a male only profession with no female particpation whatsoever.
  • GeneralissimoGeneralissimo Posts: 6,289
    Forum Member
    homer2012 wrote: »
    Convicted rapist shouldnt be allowed to work with women again, yes the clubs do have female staff there.

    As for the he wasnt guilty, well he was found guilty and no matter what we think the jury made the verdict on the evidence presented. FACT!

    Well, yeah. But he was wrongfully convicted - juries aren't infallible.
  • The_don1The_don1 Posts: 17,418
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Well, yeah. But he was wrongfully convicted - juries aren't infallible.

    it's totally unimportant if he did or not. That has nothing to do with this topic
  • Evo102Evo102 Posts: 13,630
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Heh, yeah, I was struggling to think of a male only profession with no female particpation whatsoever.

    A monk in a closed order?
  • HarrisonMarksHarrisonMarks Posts: 4,360
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Evo102 wrote: »
    A monk in a closed order?

    I doubt that Mr Evans has the Latin.
  • GeneralissimoGeneralissimo Posts: 6,289
    Forum Member
    The_don1 wrote: »
    it's totally unimportant if he did or not. That has nothing to do with this topic

    Of course it does - he still maintains his absolute innocence.
  • RoweyRowey Posts: 2,154
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    1. There was absolutely no evidence presented that the victim either did not consent, or was too intoxicated to give informed consent.

    2. Evans co-accused, the one who met and took her to the hotel, was acquitted. If she was capable of consenting to him, then why wasn't she capable of consenting to Evans?

    3. The victim boasted to her friends about getting a 'big win' after the trial.

    Juries sometimes make big mistakes - and this was one such case.
    Total lies, if that was true he would have been allowed an appeal. But he got turned down as the evidence was overwhelming.

    [highlight]Important: Everyone needs to sign this petition...[/highlight]

    http://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/kevin-mccabe-chairman-of-sheffield-utd-football-club-refuse-to-reinstate-ched-evans-as-a-player-at-sheffield-united

    He's shown NO remorse and hasn't even apologised to the victim who now has her whole life ruined, where as he gets to rake in a fortune every-week with a big smile on his face.
  • Skyclaw726Skyclaw726 Posts: 2,931
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    He has done his time he is entitled to return to his life and if that means having him in my team *actually a Arsenal fan but you get the drift* then so be it. I honestly don't care.
  • GeneralissimoGeneralissimo Posts: 6,289
    Forum Member
    Rowey wrote: »
    Total lies, if that was true he would have been allowed an appeal. But he got turned down as the evidence was overwhelming.

    [highlight]Important: Everyone needs to sign this petition...[/highlight]

    http://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/kevin-mccabe-chairman-of-sheffield-utd-football-club-refuse-to-reinstate-ched-evans-as-a-player-at-sheffield-united

    Actually I think you will find that all three points are quite factual. The wording of the petition, however, is incredibly misleading as there was never ANY suggestion of violence towards the woman. She had no injuries at all.
  • The_don1The_don1 Posts: 17,418
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Of course it does - he still maintains his absolute innocence.

    It don't matter what he says or anyone else says.

    You could maintain Elvis served you in a shop last week
  • Skyclaw726Skyclaw726 Posts: 2,931
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I would also like to add that a Petition to prevent someone from returning to work after he has served his time for whatever crime is quite frankly ludicrous.
  • GeneralissimoGeneralissimo Posts: 6,289
    Forum Member
    The_don1 wrote: »
    It don't matter what he says or anyone else says.

    You could maintain Elvis served you in a shop last week

    It would be an entirely different matter if he had admitted guilt and was looking for forgiveness. But as far as he is concerned he is the one whose life has been ruined and I think he will continue the fight to clear his name even after release.
  • Evo102Evo102 Posts: 13,630
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Rowey wrote: »
    [highlight]Important: Everyone needs to sign this petition...[/highlight]

    No we don't, have you read the petition? Full of misandristic nonsense.
  • The_don1The_don1 Posts: 17,418
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Rowey wrote: »
    Total lies, if that was true he would have been allowed an appeal. But he got turned down as the evidence was overwhelming.

    [highlight]Important: Everyone needs to sign this petition...[/highlight]

    http://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/kevin-mccabe-chairman-of-sheffield-utd-football-club-refuse-to-reinstate-ched-evans-as-a-player-at-sheffield-united

    He's shown NO remorse and hasn't even apologised to the victim who now has her whole life ruined, where as he gets to rake in a fortune every-week with a big smile on his face.

    Ah so it's not him working that's the issue it's the level of money? Let's put him on minimum wage for life? Who judges what a hugh amount of money is?

    Like a poster saying he is innocent is not the issue neither is him admitting or not admitting he is guilty. He was found guilty that's the only relevant fact along with he has served his sentence set down by law
Sign In or Register to comment.