:rolleyes:I wasn't aware that on DS we had to LOVE everyone. Unless you are Phil Collins himself or have an extremely thin skin by-proxy for him - then I don't see how that could have offended anyone.
You really mustn't get so upset by comments on a forum. If you get upset so easily at stuff on a message board - you're not really prepared for the harsh lessons of real life.
:rolleyes:I wasn't aware that on DS we had to LOVE everyone. Unless you are Phil Collins himself or have an extremely thin skin by-proxy for him - then I don't see how that could have offended anyone.
You really mustn't get so upset by comments on a forum. If you get upset so easily at stuff on a message board - you're not really prepared for the harsh lessons of real life.
By for now Phil!:D
Who said I'm upset about Phil Collins, it's how you are speaking to other members which caused me to comment and FYI the word is "bye" not "by"
Who said I'm upset about Phil Collins, it's how you are speaking to other members which caused me to comment and FYI the word is "bye" not "by"
Point taken Scone - BUT! The guy who pointed out the Guardian article singled out MY post only - irrespective of the fact that lots of others had posted as though PC's 'alleged' words were gospel - when everyone knows that papers (even the broadsheets on occasion) can twist stuff. His post to me I felt was very patronising and he came off as some sort of old schoolmaster with a naughty child - so NO - I didn't mind my post in response being a bit 'arsey'.
I think you'll find that I very seldom insult people on other boards (unless they've really riled me personally). I certainly wouldn't get my knickers in a twist on behalf of someone else.
BTW and FYI - the 'by' was a typo as was typing rather too fast - I found your remark rather hurtful!!!!!!!
(It didn't really i just put that in for effect):D
Point taken Scone - BUT! The guy who pointed out the Guardian article singled out MY post only - irrespective of the fact that lots of others had posted as though PC's 'alleged' words were gospel - when everyone knows that papers (even the broadsheets on occasion) can twist stuff. His post to me I felt was very patronising and he came off as some sort of old schoolmaster with a naughty child - so NO - I didn't mind my post in response being a bit 'arsey'.
I think you'll find that I very seldom insult people on other boards (unless they've really riled me personally). I certainly wouldn't get my knickers in a twist on behalf of someone else.
BTW and FYI - the 'by' was a typo as was typing rather too fast - I found your remark rather hurtful!!!!!!!
(It didn't really i just put that in for effect):D
Hahahaha ok, your attitude doesn't stink, great reply
Comments
I'm not sure I'd notice if he had.
:rolleyes:I wasn't aware that on DS we had to LOVE everyone. Unless you are Phil Collins himself or have an extremely thin skin by-proxy for him - then I don't see how that could have offended anyone.
You really mustn't get so upset by comments on a forum. If you get upset so easily at stuff on a message board - you're not really prepared for the harsh lessons of real life.
By for now Phil!:D
Who said I'm upset about Phil Collins, it's how you are speaking to other members which caused me to comment and FYI the word is "bye" not "by"
I think you'll find that I very seldom insult people on other boards (unless they've really riled me personally). I certainly wouldn't get my knickers in a twist on behalf of someone else.
BTW and FYI - the 'by' was a typo as was typing rather too fast - I found your remark rather hurtful!!!!!!!
(It didn't really i just put that in for effect):D
Hahahaha ok, your attitude doesn't stink, great reply
No hard feelings whatsoever