Harry Styles Paparazzi Harassment Order
Pop star Harry Styles has won a court order stopping the paparazzi from harassing him.
The 19-year-old One Direction singer applied to the High Court as a last resort after trying to persuade a number of photographers to stop their behaviour voluntarily, according to his counsel David Sherborne.
He told Mrs Justice Nicola Davies, who first granted the order against the unidentified individuals last Monday: "This is not a privacy injunction.
http://news.sky.com/story/1183025/harry-styles-1d-singer-wins-paparazzi-order
_________________
Some of these stars bring it on themselves for the paps to follow them. I understand it can be ignoring.
0
Comments
They should just be at events, or if they are certain some celeb is doing something wrong. But not following them on their every move.
I don't download or view any pictures of celebs just going about their business, such as photos of Celeb X coming out of a fitness center.
That would likely remove a massive chunk of their income if they did that. Cowell wouldn't be too happy with the restraining order against their fans either.
A documentary I watched 7 years ago showed just how little the photographers cared about the celebrities they wanted photos of. It wouldn't surprised me if a tabloid photographer carried on snapping away if the celebrity in question fell and had a heart attack.
I don't care how much any celebrity wants to be famous. How can you have a life if paps are camped outside your door, following you around 24/7 waiting to take a picture of every single thing you do. Nobody asks for that and nobody deserves it. They can also be dangerous as hell when they're pursuing celebrities in cars. It's really not justifiable.
Also if anyone makes an effort to suck it up and deal with it, it's Harry, so I'm guessing they were very full on for him to resort to this.
If nobody paid him attention he wouldnt be famous would he
Don't be obtuse, there are different levels of attention. I'm actually amazed that asking not to have paps waiting outside your home, not to have surveillance put on you and not to be pursued by cars from your homes/hotels etc is seen as some sort of diva request! Obviously he's not asking for all attention to cease, just some basic human respect for his privacy. There's no reason at all to follow any celeb around 24/7.
Stupid thing to say. Wanting to be famous doesn't mean giving people the right to invade your privacy and harrass you just for a picture.
Totally agree. Makes me think of Britney Spears when she was having her troubles and the videos on youtube of the relentless papz absolutely hounding her. I can see how it could drive you totally potty after a while.
But as soon as they sense weakness paps just relentlessly go in for the kill and they document every minute of it. That's got nothing to do with being famous it's just feeding the sick desire people have to build people up and then revel in their downfall.
They really are relentless and there should be more legailites in place to protect those theyre chasing and the innocent bystanders caught up in the chaos too.
So it's ok for little 11 year old girls to stalk, harass and wait outside his house for a photo opportunity?
You have evidence of this I assume?
I doubt paps are sat outside Styles' house 24/7 either. What about the thousands of fans who block streets outside hotels causing road closures,disrupting other guests etc. That's ok with Harry is it? The countless abuse the fans give out on twitter,is worse than any "harassment" he endures I'm sure.
I know that was Paris but if you ignore the conspiracy stories wasn't Princess Diana (or stripped of title lady!!) literally hounded to her death
No she wasnt. Diana informed the media enough times of her movements,you cant play with fire and complain when you get burned.
I have to agree. Diana played with fire and got burned, as tragic as her death was.