Cameron had his blame gun set to scatter as usual.
Milliband clearly more of a leader and calmer than Cameron. Good work Ed.
You either don't have the capacity to interpret events, or you are a Labour loyalist to the core. I will err on the generous and suggest the latter. :D:D
In some ways I admire your loyalty to the cause, but the public won't buy it.
"The Prime Minister:
The party opposite want to talk about absolutely everything apart from their record of 13 years in government. I have to say that we may have found the Higgs boson particle, but Labour has not found a sense of shame."
I was wondering though- Cameron could have really gone for it, with Labour being the party in power at the time, and the front bench being so heavily involved, he could have really laid into them. But he didn't. It was just a boring repetitive exchange about procedure. Why might he have held back so much?
I was wondering though- Cameron could have really gone for it, with Labour being the party in power at the time, and the front bench being so heavily involved, he could have really laid into them. But he didn't. It was just a boring repetitive exchange about procedure. Why might he have held back so much?
I wondered that. I was thinking a few things. Timing, maybe he knows something, and it will have a huge impact when it's revealed, that shows Labour in a terrible light.
Or that they themselves have something massive to hide, so don't want to appear cocky kind of thing. I've not been following it too much at all, but I watched PMQs yesterday as I was off, and thought it was all a bit lame.
I wondered that. I was thinking a few things. Timing, maybe he knows something, and it will have a huge impact when it's revealed, that shows Labour in a terrible light.
Or that they themselves have something massive to hide, so don't want to appear cocky kind of thing. I've not been following it too much at all, but I watched PMQs yesterday as I was off, and thought it was all a bit lame.
Same
I was expecting a lot more than that (only just watched it).
Either cameron isn't sure about the info he has and is waiting for it to be confirmed, or his own party have something to hide)
Comments
Yes, and if he doesn't get his e(i)quiry, he will scweem and scweem and scweem.
You either don't have the capacity to interpret events, or you are a Labour loyalist to the core. I will err on the generous and suggest the latter.
In some ways I admire your loyalty to the cause, but the public won't buy it.
It is a terrific line
I thought it was terrible!
I was wondering though- Cameron could have really gone for it, with Labour being the party in power at the time, and the front bench being so heavily involved, he could have really laid into them. But he didn't. It was just a boring repetitive exchange about procedure. Why might he have held back so much?
Timing!!!;)
The right time will come...wait and see
I wondered that. I was thinking a few things. Timing, maybe he knows something, and it will have a huge impact when it's revealed, that shows Labour in a terrible light.
Or that they themselves have something massive to hide, so don't want to appear cocky kind of thing. I've not been following it too much at all, but I watched PMQs yesterday as I was off, and thought it was all a bit lame.
Same
I was expecting a lot more than that (only just watched it).
Either cameron isn't sure about the info he has and is waiting for it to be confirmed, or his own party have something to hide)