Coronation Street - Suspension of Reality (Part 7)

12357216

Comments

  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 13,448
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    If you ever need to use a Pawn Shop and intend to retrieve your item DONT use the ones in Manchester. Seems they let anyone buy anything back without a ticket or proof of ownership......especially watches! :D
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 13,448
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Rossy22 wrote: »
    No. He isn't the parent. If he has reason to believe Faye is in danger he can flag it up to social services and hope they decide she's better off with him, but it's all unlikely. The whole storyline's a pure farce.

    Thanks, that's what I thought.
  • jsmith99jsmith99 Posts: 20,382
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Meldrewman wrote: »
    Thank you.

    Not at all.
  • RearViewMirrorRearViewMirror Posts: 76
    Forum Member
    amysmum wrote: »
    I don't know much about adoption but can a biological parent apply for custody of a child who has been legally adopted by another family?

    No and (as I mentioned earlier) Faye would no longer have an assigned social worker either, yet she apparently does.
  • kiviraatkiviraat Posts: 4,634
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    No and (as I mentioned earlier) Faye would no longer have an assigned social worker either, yet she apparently does.

    I thought the social worker was back on the scene because Anna contacted them to ask advice about this Tim bloke suddenly appearing? I could have dreamed that though...
  • Joy DeanJoy Dean Posts: 21,346
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    kiviraat wrote: »
    I thought the social worker was back on the scene because Anna contacted them to ask advice about this Tim bloke suddenly appearing? I could have dreamed that though...

    Yes; he was checked out and found to be okay.
  • RearViewMirrorRearViewMirror Posts: 76
    Forum Member
    kiviraat wrote: »
    I thought the social worker was back on the scene because Anna contacted them to ask advice about this Tim bloke suddenly appearing? I could have dreamed that though...
    k9fan wrote: »
    Yes; he was checked out and found to be okay.

    Yeah, but Anna referred to her as "Faye's social worker" and it was indicated that she had regular contact with the family. In real life, Faye wouldn't have a particular social worker as she was out of the "system" and Anna would have had to contact social services in general.

    A minor detail, but a SOR nonetheless.
  • WolfsheadishWolfsheadish Posts: 10,400
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I was recently at home, sick with the 'flu, and watched several old CS episodes on YouTube - mostly from the 1960s and 1970s. I was struck by how much BETTER they all were than the stuff we're being fobbed off with now! (And yes, I'm aware that I could stop watching.) The story lines were much more realistic and much more about the characters. Even though those characters led rather narrow little lives, they were realistic and INTERESTING. I wish the current writers would go back and watch a few of those.
  • LaineyTLaineyT Posts: 6,392
    Forum Member
    amysmum wrote: »
    If you ever need to use a Pawn Shop and intend to retrieve your item DONT use the ones in Manchester. Seems they let anyone buy anything back without a ticket or proof of ownership......especially watches! :D

    Thats very true Id forgot about Lewis and his recent trip to the pawn shop :D
  • kevthelutonbeekevthelutonbee Posts: 1,165
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    re the ever so tedious story line about Fay

    Has Anna actually been to court to sign the papers relating to the adoption yet? If not then the local authority still is responsible for the child.

    Instead of Owen permanently showing his paddy and generally trying to act hard, why don't they just speak to the social workers to see exactly what rights Tim has?
  • kiviraatkiviraat Posts: 4,634
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Yeah, but Anna referred to her as "Faye's social worker" and it was indicated that she had regular contact with the family. In real life, Faye wouldn't have a particular social worker as she was out of the "system" and Anna would have had to contact social services in general.

    A minor detail, but a SOR nonetheless.

    Thanks for the info guys x
  • MeldrewmanMeldrewman Posts: 3,683
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Made me smile when Roy showed the casino manager an itemised list of his Mum's losses - as if she would have kept a list or remembered her precise losses to relate to Roy. :rolleyes:
  • mrsdaisychainmrsdaisychain Posts: 3,433
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Meldrewman wrote: »
    Made me smile when Roy showed the casino manager an itemised list of his Mum's losses - as if she would have kept a list or remembered her precise losses to relate to Roy. :rolleyes:

    As you mentioned the casino manager, it racked my brains as to where I had seen him before, he was the mad man that pushed the blonde girl who's name i have forgotten over the cliff in Emmerdale years ago. His name is Kevin Pallister and I think his name was Graham or something in the programme. I'm sure he was on Corrie years ago too.
  • MeldrewmanMeldrewman Posts: 3,683
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    As you mentioned the casino manager, it racked my brains as to where I had seen him before, he was the mad man that pushed the blonde girl who's name i have forgotten over the cliff in Emmerdale years ago. His name is Kevin Pallister and I think his name was Graham or something in the programme. I'm sure he was on Corrie years ago too.

    Wow! Nice one! He was Graham Clark - I only knew that from here.
  • mrsdaisychainmrsdaisychain Posts: 3,433
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Meldrewman wrote: »
    Wow! Nice one! He was Graham Clark - I only knew that from here.

    Thank you for that. Tell you what, it so annoyed me I couldn't think who it was:D
  • Brummie Girl Brummie Girl Posts: 22,421
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    bgtension wrote: »
    Meldrewman wrote: »
    Sorry, did I say that you hadn't? You'll find that others replying to your post didn't - which is often the way,

    As Meldrewman said we never accused you bgtension of not using spoilers in your initial post it was all the 'replies' that were not in spoilers
  • Anika HansonAnika Hanson Posts: 15,629
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I can't believe Anna makes beans on toast for dinner, and to think she served that when she has company.
  • MeldrewmanMeldrewman Posts: 3,683
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I've now seen Roy's card counting exploits. Leaving aside the ridiculous idea as a story, why can't they take the time to let the scene develop properly and stage it better?

    Roy sees about half a dozen cards and that's enough for him to see a pattern, the dealer allows him to stop mid hand and turn to hold a conversation with the others (wouldn't that be seen as a little suspicious) and, finally, they couldn't have made it more obvious, with the whooping and hollering, that there was something going on.

    I'm also not at all sure that Roy's outlook on life would see him taking such action to retrieve money which he knows was lost legitimately.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 13,448
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    So how many Corrie characters have now returned from abroad after a short period of time with a boyfriend/fiance in tow. Smacks of rehashing old storylines AGAIN!.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 13,448
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    And just what legal claim does Gail have over Lewis' clothes? No more so than Beth, so why threaten her with the police?
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 13,572
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Meldrewman wrote: »
    Made me smile when Roy showed the casino manager an itemised list of his Mum's losses - as if she would have kept a list or remembered her precise losses to relate to Roy. :rolleyes:

    It was ridiculous
    Meldrewman wrote: »
    I've now seen Roy's card counting exploits. Leaving aside the ridiculous idea as a story, why can't they take the time to let the scene develop properly and stage it better?

    Roy sees about half a dozen cards and that's enough for him to see a pattern, the dealer allows him to stop mid hand and turn to hold a conversation with the others (wouldn't that be seen as a little suspicious) and, finally, they couldn't have made it more obvious, with the whooping and hollering, that there was something going on.

    I'm also not at all sure that Roy's outlook on life would see him taking such action to retrieve money which he knows was lost legitimately.


    Agreed, in fact that he went to ask for his Mother's losses back in the first instance was ridiculous, as if a casino would even consider it
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 13,448
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Labourer wanted? I wonder who..............:rolleyes::rolleyes:
  • mrsdaisychainmrsdaisychain Posts: 3,433
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    amysmum wrote: »
    Labourer wanted? I wonder who..............:rolleyes::rolleyes:

    pathetic isin't it?
  • trevon1trevon1 Posts: 6,530
    Forum Member
    amysmum wrote: »
    Labourer wanted? I wonder who..............:rolleyes::rolleyes:

    I know. How convenient.
  • LaineyTLaineyT Posts: 6,392
    Forum Member
    amysmum wrote: »
    And just what legal claim does Gail have over Lewis' clothes? No more so than Beth, so why threaten her with the police?

    Thats true she hasnt any claim on his clothes Id say Audrey had more of a claim lol...but its been done so Gail could rummage through Lewis's pants to find the envelope with her password on that Kylie wrote for him... Now Id have thougth he would have thrown the paper away :rolleyes:
This discussion has been closed.