You are the one who commented on it, so it must matter to
you!.
I see you have sent a link as to the state of the British railway system. why is beyond me, but while we are on the subject,Is it not the government of the day,s responsibility to sort it out?.London to Edinburgh?, he,s in IBIZA!.
It mattered enough to you that you started making claims about RAF planes and flight times...from what appears to be a rather limited knowledge of the hardware available to the relevant unit based at Brize Norton.
I would put the spade away if I were you...either that or find a ladder to take down the hole with you
No what you said was that he could do the trip in an hour in an RAF plane...and knowing someone who works with the aircraft the RAF makes available for govt/royal family I could have told you that was BS...that the only RAF planes capable of doing the trip in an hour would be something like a Typhoon fighter.
It would probably have to be based on the island as well, ready - I'm not sure the RAF has a base on Ibiza...
That David Cameron should only wear new clothes while on holiday?
I think you'll find the same posters would then be accusing him of extravagance ind being out of touch with the country, when normal working families can't afford new clothes.
I think you'll find the same posters would then be accusing him of extravagance ind being out of touch with the country, when normal working families can't afford new clothes.
The best thing about this thread is that it shows the extent to which the papers can pump out crap at will and still manage to get sections of the public foaming away in outrage.
It is because of the issue with Europe. Murdoch, the Telegraph, the Mail and the Express want the UK to get out. Because they see Cameron as dragging his feet, they are going for him in the hope that the Tories will dump him before the general election and elect a new leader/PM who is far more eurosceptic. They see Cameron as a loser at the 2015 general election amid competition for votes from UKIP.
Could you give us a rundown on the things he is doing " relatively well", because from where im standing he hasn't done anything at all well!.
It would take a while - relatively well was the important phrase - considering the mess that was inherited from Labour - immigration, for example - but also creating the FSA prior to the bank crisis.
It would take a while - relatively well was the important phrase - considering the mess that was inherited from Labour - immigration, for example - but also creating the FSA prior to the bank crisis.
So you are saying it was all labours fault?. Nothing what so ever to do with the failure of the bankers or a global recession?. & "relatively well" is not what i have seen in the last 3 years. I have seen total stagnation from an incompetent chancellor praised by a egotistical prime minister. The country is NOT getting better it is in limbo. Cameron made promise after promise & has reneged on every one. If you can find any promises he has kept, i would be grateful if you could share them with me. The fact is, he is ineffective, out of touch & useless!.
I think you'll find the same posters would then be accusing him of extravagance ind being out of touch with the country, when normal working families can't afford new clothes.
The best thing about this thread is that it shows the extent to which the papers can pump out crap at will and still manage to get sections of the public foaming away in outrage.
Or even convincing sections that cameron really gives an iota about the public.
Wasn't it? I agree it was banking that failed - but that was the responsibility of the financial watchdogs which were formed by government.
The question is would the Bank of England have made a better watchdog than the FSA?
Nothing what so ever to do with the failure of the bankers or a global recession?.
I don't see why 'entanglement' couldn't have been minimized.
& "relatively well" is not what i have seen in the last 3 years. I have seen total stagnation from an incompetent chancellor praised by a egotistical prime minister. The country is NOT getting better it is in limbo. Cameron made promise after promise & has reneged on every one. If you can find any promises he has kept, i would be grateful if you could share them with me. The fact is, he is ineffective, out of touch & useless!.
I would say your statement was a "partisan cheap shot" at defending the useless idiot!.
You would fail at logic and reason if you did say such a thing, since there was nothing whatsoever in my reply that could possibly have been construed as partisan.
Comments
You are the one who commented on it, so it must matter to
you!.
I see you have sent a link as to the state of the British railway system. why is beyond me, but while we are on the subject,Is it not the government of the day,s responsibility to sort it out?.London to Edinburgh?, he,s in IBIZA!.
It mattered enough to you that you started making claims about RAF planes and flight times...from what appears to be a rather limited knowledge of the hardware available to the relevant unit based at Brize Norton.
I would put the spade away if I were you...either that or find a ladder to take down the hole with you
It would probably have to be based on the island as well, ready - I'm not sure the RAF has a base on Ibiza...
*walks away whistling*
Quite...so an hour for the Typhoon to get there and an hour back...whoops...it might actually be quicker to fly commercial after all
Assuming this isn't some partisan cheap shot, we have Wikipedia and other Internet resources for answering these kinds of questions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Minister_of_the_United_Kingdom
I think you'll find the same posters would then be accusing him of extravagance ind being out of touch with the country, when normal working families can't afford new clothes.
Can't understand why the Mail are in a strop for.
Exactly. And no doubt being bought with the "undeserved massive pay rise he's just had".
The best thing about this thread is that it shows the extent to which the papers can pump out crap at will and still manage to get sections of the public foaming away in outrage.
Wern't you complaining about certain MP's choosing to remain on holiday rather than attend the thatcher tributes in the commons?
It is because of the issue with Europe. Murdoch, the Telegraph, the Mail and the Express want the UK to get out. Because they see Cameron as dragging his feet, they are going for him in the hope that the Tories will dump him before the general election and elect a new leader/PM who is far more eurosceptic. They see Cameron as a loser at the 2015 general election amid competition for votes from UKIP.
It would take a while - relatively well was the important phrase - considering the mess that was inherited from Labour - immigration, for example - but also creating the FSA prior to the bank crisis.
So you are saying it was all labours fault?. Nothing what so ever to do with the failure of the bankers or a global recession?. & "relatively well" is not what i have seen in the last 3 years. I have seen total stagnation from an incompetent chancellor praised by a egotistical prime minister. The country is NOT getting better it is in limbo. Cameron made promise after promise & has reneged on every one. If you can find any promises he has kept, i would be grateful if you could share them with me. The fact is, he is ineffective, out of touch & useless!.
I would say your statement was a "partisan cheap shot" at defending the useless idiot!.
Let alone holidays!.
Or even convincing sections that cameron really gives an iota about the public.
Wasn't it? I agree it was banking that failed - but that was the responsibility of the financial watchdogs which were formed by government.
The question is would the Bank of England have made a better watchdog than the FSA?
I don't see why 'entanglement' couldn't have been minimized.
I don't think it matters if he changes his mind.
Between that, their well above average basic salaries, plus extremely generous expenses & cast iron pensions, they're onto a right cushy number there.
I'd love a first class ticket to ride on that gravy train (paid for by taxpayers of course)!
Anyone want to vote for me at the next election?;)
Remind me again what Conservative position on banking regulation was?
They weren't in power at the time.
You would fail at logic and reason if you did say such a thing, since there was nothing whatsoever in my reply that could possibly have been construed as partisan.
Ah, so that completely negates the fact that Cameron would have happily gone with LESS regulation.
It's handy, this "not in power" lark. Remind me to use it whenever someone next complains about what Labour's position is on something.
Changes his mind?, what mind!.
CORRECT!. At last, someone who sees through their fiddling, lies & self serving greed!.