Emma Scott to step down

Night WatchmanNight Watchman Posts: 1,820
Forum Member
✭✭✭
From Techradar :
Freesat's widely respected MD Emma Scott is leaving the company after seven years.
Scott has been a fundamental part in building Freesat to its current place in the UK TV market but will leaving at the end of 2014.
"Creating a successful new TV platform has been an exhilarating journey but it is now time for me to seek new challenges in the digital media industries," said Scott.
She will be replaced by current FD Alistair Thom, formerly of BSkyB and KPMG.
Freesat is closing in on being in 2 million UK homes offering subs free satellite television, but is facing an increasingly competitive television market.

See also: http://www.joinfreesat.co.uk/emma-scott-to-leave-freesat/

Comments

  • Hooded ClawHooded Claw Posts: 504
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    All things considered, she has done a remarkably good job.


    [Tin Hat]Has she been poached by BSkyB?![/Tin Hat]
  • Nigel GoodwinNigel Goodwin Posts: 58,453
    Forum Member
    All things considered, she has done a remarkably good job.

    You think so?, the trade certainly don't :p

    Freesat managed to launch, and perform fairly well DESPITE Emma Scott, not BECAUSE of her :D

    They even had to bring someone else in to make the launch happen, an ex-Panasonic guy if I remember correctly?.
  • peter05peter05 Posts: 3,569
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I think Emma scott has done a good job and I wish her well for the future, Freesat is still here and growing all the time, even with a certain pay tv sat company all ways trying to get the goverment to get rid of Freesat
  • popeye13popeye13 Posts: 8,573
    Forum Member
    Adding to her C.V what she has done at Freesat in terms of where it is now and what was actually expected is something any future employer should have an instant woody over as she's done a job nothing short of sensational.
    She's got the tenacity and drive to make something a success. Freesat was 'destined' to fail and look at it now, in well over 2m homes as the primary TV and many many more a secondary.
    She leaves it in great shape and on solid footing.
    Good luck to her!
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 158
    Forum Member
    popeye13 wrote: »
    ... in well over 2m homes as the primary TV and many many more a secondary...
    Not even Freesat claim that...

    http://www.joinfreesat.co.uk/strong-quarterly-growth-freesat-pay-viewers-switch-freetime/

    ...looks like it's you with the woody, which is kind of creepy.
  • popeye13popeye13 Posts: 8,573
    Forum Member
    Not even Freesat claim that...

    http://www.joinfreesat.co.uk/strong-quarterly-growth-freesat-pay-viewers-switch-freetime/

    ...looks like it's you with the woody, which is kind of creepy.

    Well, when you consider that the OFCOM surveys are not an entire blanket of the UK (That not the entire population replies or even enters them) 2m would not be off the mark at all.
    Its in 3.84m homes currently, so how is that creepy?
  • davemurgatroyddavemurgatroyd Posts: 13,328
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    popeye13 wrote: »
    Well, when you consider that the OFCOM surveys are not an entire blanket of the UK (That not the entire population replies or even enters them) 2m would not be off the mark at all.
    Its in 3.84m homes currently, so how is that creepy?

    Wrong - they reckon they have 3.84m viewers NOT homes.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 158
    Forum Member
    Wrong - they reckon they have 3.84m viewers NOT homes.
    Thanks.
    It seems popeye13's reading ability is about on a par with his polite use of the English language.
  • popeye13popeye13 Posts: 8,573
    Forum Member
    Thanks.
    It seems popeye13's reading ability is about on a par with his polite use of the English language.

    How mature.......!
    Wrong - they reckon they have 3.84m viewers NOT homes.

    My bad...
  • ds_readerds_reader Posts: 10,353
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    BARB stats:-

    http://www.barb.co.uk/file/download/news/SVODServices14Q1.pdf

    Total Households 27,320,000

    Sky 9,154,000

    Sky (no sub) 644,000

    Freesat 1,079,000

    Other Sat 339,000

    DCAB 4,190,000

    DTT 10,671,000

    Amazon 1,217,000

    Netflix 2,791,000

    NowTV 239,000


    Ofcom Stats:-

    http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/statistics/2014sep/Consumer_issues_survey_experience_of_nuisance_calls_and_unexpectedly_high_bills.pdf

    Virgin Media 16%

    Sky 37%

    Freesat 4% >>> 1,092,800

    Other Sat 1%

    Freeview 44%

    Freeview with pay 5%

    BT TV 4%

    TalkTalk TV 2%

    No TV in houshold 3%
  • Nigel GoodwinNigel Goodwin Posts: 58,453
    Forum Member
    ds_reader wrote: »
    BARB stats:-

    Sky 9,154,000

    Sky (no sub) 644,000

    That survey rather proves how absolutely useless surveys are :D

    Sky have in excess of 10 million subscribers, so that figures is too low - but the ex-Sky (no sub) figures is completely ludicrous, in practice it's probably not far short of the number of subscribers, but certainly well in the millions.

    On those figures presumably the Freesat (and all other) numbers is badly under estimated as well?.

    Here are official Sky figures from 2013, probably a 'little' higher than that now?

    http://corporate.sky.com/media/key_facts_and_figures
  • IanPIanP Posts: 3,661
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    The BARB and Ofcom figures wont include Sky's Irish, Spanish (or other ex-pat) subscribers. The non-subscriber Sky box figures were always unreliable in the old Ofcom surveys, I don't know if BARB are any better at getting to the truth (either through ignorance or deliberate deception) I suspect those surveyed massively under report non-subscription Sky boxes. I also suspect many Freesat homes end up reporting as Freeview, Sky or ex-Sky through ignorance. With Freeview and Sky being much higher profile it would be easy for people in a hurry that didn't have a large input on the selection of TV provider to mistakenly claim the wrong one. Finally it very easy to just lie on consumer surveys to get through them quicker and get rid of the surveyor. I made the mistake of answering part of a "quick" telephone consumer survey once, after about 10 minutes I was just making everything up after another 5 minutes I got bored and hung up. Soon after that I started to get a bunch of calls and junk mail that seemed connected to products and services in the survey so now I never take part in them. I have very little faith in consumer survey results now. I wonder who is answering the questions, is it a representative sample of the public or the survey company filling it in themselves sometimes to get the job "done" and how truthful are the genuine answers.
  • ds_readerds_reader Posts: 10,353
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Here's a nice comparison of regional uptake...

    http://www.barb.co.uk/trendspotting/analysis/platform-uptake?_s=4
  • TelevisionUserTelevisionUser Posts: 41,414
    Forum Member
    In short, watch this space: it's a fair bet that our categories here will become increasingly blurred in years to come. The future is almost certainly hybrid.
    http://www.barb.co.uk/trendspotting/analysis/platform-uptake?_s=4

    That's good news for Freesat's Freetime, isn't it?

    The task for the new management team at Freesat for 2015-2016 ought to be to increase the number of Freesat linear channels and to recruit more online offerings, such as Netflix, Amazon Instant, HBO, etc. to Freetime.

    Emma Scott said that Freesat had no intention of showing premium sports and that's probably a good idea to stick with that strategy otherwise Sky really would try and go all out to kill off Freesat. That said, I wouldn't be opposed to Eurosport Player joining Freetime.
Sign In or Register to comment.