I completely agree with him 100%.
I've said the same thing on here myself in the past!
I don't see any benefit of bringing a mentally or severely physically disabled child into the world.
I completely agree with him 100%.
I've said the same thing on here myself in the past!
I don't see any benefit of bringing a mentally or severely physically disabled child into the world.
I completely agree with him 100%.
I've said the same thing on here myself in the past!
I don't see any benefit of bringing a mentally or severely physically disabled child into the world.
Can we extend this so that it applies to those on the Right Wing and the Far Right? clearly there's no benefit to society of having children growing up with Right Wing views. Infact many would see such conservative views as being mentally debilitating.
It isn't UKIP policy and he hasn't been elected a councillor or to UKIP's national executive committee. He is perfectly at liberty to voice his own opinions and on this one I believe he will find very little if any support for it. The decision on abortion is one for the parents, the medical profession and the law which will never include such forced abortions.
It isn't UKIP policy and he hasn't been elected a councillor or to UKIP's national executive committee. He is perfectly at liberty to voice his own opinions and on this one I believe he will find very little if any support for it. The decision on abortion is one for the parents, the medical profession and the law which will never include such forced abortions.
I agree with this. Its a pretty abhorant opinion IMO but he is allowed to have it and unless its UKIP policy then he is not likely to get his views very far.
All this outrage from the left, aren't they the ones who are anti pro-life, and in favour abortions.?
There is a difference from the liberal/left stance of pro-choice, which includes the obvious choice of continuing with the pregnancy, to the state forcing its citizens to terminate pregnancies.
If you don't understand the difference then you should have tried harder at school.
They are the most libertarian of all the mainstream Parties.
They appear to have joined the USA free market propagandasts in claiming to be libertarian, but are not libertarian in the traditional European sense.
Noam Chomsky.
'Libertarian' throughout European history meant 'socialist-anarchist.' The worker's movement--the socialist movement--sort of broke into 2 branches, one statist, one anti-statist. The statist branch led to Bolshevism and Lenin and Trotsky and so on; the anti-statist branch, which included left-Marxists like Rosa Luxumberg, kind of merged with a big strain of anarchism into what was called 'libertarian socialism.' So 'libertarian' in Europe always meant 'socialist.'
One thing no one has even said, is within an hour of this coming out UKIP suspended him and issued a statement that he would never stand as a UKIP representative again due to his comments.
Libertarianism is about getting rid of all laws except laws regarding security and property as well as laws that facilitate peoples ability to make choices. Since no-one is forced to get married, then it would be upto the choice.
libertarianism taken to its extreme would also allow marriage between humans and property, Humans and animals and adults and children
All this outrage from the left, aren't they the ones who are anti pro-life, and in favour abortions.?
:eek:You're confused! That's worrying that you can't see the difference between being forced to have an abortion and choosing to have one. Does the difference between having sex with someone and being raped confuse you also? They're both sexual intercourse, right?
At the end of the day he's entitled to his opinion but remember this is just ONE person. This is not the whole party's view on it. So before all the lefties start getting hysterical over this just remember there are MPs from ALL parties that have got certain views on things which they know 99% of the public disagree with.
I cannot see any situation apart from perhaps where the mother is in a coma and continuing the pregnancy will endanger her life where a forced abortion is justifiable.
Comments
I completely agree with him 100%.
I've said the same thing on here myself in the past!
I don't see any benefit of bringing a mentally or severely physically disabled child into the world.
Love.
An alien concept to the extreme right of course.
Can we extend this so that it applies to those on the Right Wing and the Far Right? clearly there's no benefit to society of having children growing up with Right Wing views. Infact many would see such conservative views as being mentally debilitating.
Well they love money, and racial purity.
UKIP aren't libertarian, they just think it sounds good to claim that they are.
and shiny boots ?
I agree with this. Its a pretty abhorant opinion IMO but he is allowed to have it and unless its UKIP policy then he is not likely to get his views very far.
Erm...difference dont you think between choosing to have an abortion and being forced to have one.
There is a difference from the liberal/left stance of pro-choice, which includes the obvious choice of continuing with the pregnancy, to the state forcing its citizens to terminate pregnancies.
If you don't understand the difference then you should have tried harder at school.
They are the most libertarian of all the mainstream Parties. People power by rererenda is liberty.
They appear to have joined the USA free market propagandasts in claiming to be libertarian, but are not libertarian in the traditional European sense.
Noam Chomsky.
'Libertarian' throughout European history meant 'socialist-anarchist.' The worker's movement--the socialist movement--sort of broke into 2 branches, one statist, one anti-statist. The statist branch led to Bolshevism and Lenin and Trotsky and so on; the anti-statist branch, which included left-Marxists like Rosa Luxumberg, kind of merged with a big strain of anarchism into what was called 'libertarian socialism.' So 'libertarian' in Europe always meant 'socialist.'
If UKIP were truly libertarian, they would not object to gay marriage.
They are not libertarian.
Farage is delighted that they could benefit from the fall-out over the legalisation of gay marriage. Some libertarian.
Strange logic.
It's actually perfectly correct logic.
To you it would be.
Do you understand the meaning of libertarian?
See post #39.
Libertarianism is about getting rid of all laws except laws regarding security and property as well as laws that facilitate peoples ability to make choices. Since no-one is forced to get married, then it would be upto the choice.
libertarianism taken to its extreme would also allow marriage between humans and property, Humans and animals and adults and children
:eek:You're confused! That's worrying that you can't see the difference between being forced to have an abortion and choosing to have one. Does the difference between having sex with someone and being raped confuse you also? They're both sexual intercourse, right?